ObjectiveWe aimed to elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms underlying autosomal dominant adult‐onset demyelinating leukodystrophy (ADLD), and to understand the genotype/phenotype correlation of structural variants (SVs) in the LMNB1 locus.BackgroundSince the discovery of 3D genome architectures and topologically associating domains (TADs), new pathomechanisms have been postulated for SVs, regardless of gene dosage changes. ADLD is a rare genetic disease associated with duplications (classical ADLD) or noncoding deletions (atypical ADLD) in the LMNB1 locus.MethodsHigh‐throughput chromosome conformation capture, RNA sequencing, histopathological analyses of postmortem brain tissues, and clinical and neuroradiological investigations were performed.ResultsWe collected data from >20 families worldwide carrying SVs in the LMNB1 locus and reported strong clinical variability, even among patients carrying duplications of the entire LMNB1 gene, ranging from classical and atypical ADLD to asymptomatic carriers. We showed that patients with classic ADLD always carried intra‐TAD duplications, resulting in a simple gene dose gain. Atypical ADLD was caused by LMNB1 forebrain‐specific misexpression due to inter‐TAD deletions or duplications. The inter‐TAD duplication, which extends centromerically and crosses the 2 TAD boundaries, did not cause ADLD. Our results provide evidence that astrocytes are key players in ADLD pathology.InterpretationOur study sheds light on the 3D genome and TAD structural changes associated with SVs in the LMNB1 locus, and shows that a duplication encompassing LMNB1 is not sufficient per se to diagnose ADLD, thereby strongly affecting genetic counseling. Our study supports breaking TADs as an emerging pathogenic mechanism that should be considered when studying brain diseases. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:855–870
Epigenomic and somatic mutations of pituitary tumors with clinical and pathological correlations in 111 patients
AbstractObjectiveTo profile clinically non‐aggressive and aggressive pituitary adenomas (PAs)/pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) and pituitary carcinomas for somatic mutations and epigenetic alterations of genes involved in cell proliferation/differentiation, microRNAs (miRNA)/long noncoding RNA (LncRNA)‐post‐transcriptional regulators and therapy targets.DesignRetrospective observational study.Patients and MeasurementsA total of 64 non‐aggressive and 41 aggressive PAs/PitNETs and 6 pituitary carcinomas treated by endoscopic surgery with ≥1‐year follow‐up were included. Somatic mutations of 17 genes and DNA methylation of 22 genes were assessed. Ten normal pituitaries were used as control.ResultsWe found at least one mutation in 17 tumours, including 6/64 non‐aggressive, 10/41 aggressive PAs/PitNETs, and 1/6 pituitary carcinoma. AIP (N = 6) was the most frequently mutated gene, followed by NOTCH (4), and TP53 (3). Hypermethylation of PARP15, LINC00599, ZAP70 was more common in aggressive than non‐aggressive PAs/PITNETs (p < .05). Lower levels of methylation of AIP, GNAS and PDCD1 were detected in aggressive PAs/PITNETs than non‐aggressive ones (p < .05). For X‐linked genes, males presented higher level of methylation of FLNA, UXT and MAGE family (MAGEA11, MAGEA1, MAGEC2) genes in aggressive vs. non‐aggressive PAs/PITNETs (p < .05).In pituitary carcinomas, methylation of autosomal genes PARP15, LINC00599, MIR193 and ZAP70 was higher than in PAs/PITNETs, while X‐linked genes methylation level was lower.ConclusionsSomatic mutations and methylation levels of genes involved in cell proliferation/differentiation, miRNA/LncRNA‐post‐transcriptional regulators and targets of antineoplastic therapies are different in non‐aggressive and in aggressive PAs/PitNETs. Methylation profile also varies according to gender. Combined genetic‐epigenetic analysis, in association with clinico‐radiological‐pathological data, may be of help in predicting PA/PitNET behaviour.