Al‐Shaer, Mohammad H.

Background: Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (BL TDM; drug level testing) can facilitate improved outcomes in critically ill patients. However, only 10%–20% of hospitals have implemented BL TDM. This study aimed to characterize provider perceptions and key considerations for successfully implementing BL TDM. Methods: This was a sequential mixed-methods study from 2020 to 2021 of diverse stakeholders at 3 academic medical centers with varying degrees of BL TDM implementation (not implemented, partially implemented, and fully implemented). Stakeholders were surveyed, and a proportion of participants completed semistructured interviews. Themes were identified, and findings were contextualized with implementation science frameworks. Results: Most of the 138 survey respondents perceived that BL TDM was relevant to their practice and improved medication effectiveness and safety. Integrated with interview data from 30 individuals, 2 implementation themes were identified: individual internalization and organizational features. Individuals needed to internalize, make sense of, and agree to BL TDM implementation, which was positively influenced by repeated exposure to evidence and expertise. The process of internalization appeared more complex with BL TDM than with other antibiotics (ie, vancomycin). Organizational considerations relevant to BL TDM implementation (eg, infrastructure, personnel) were similar to those identified in other TDM settings. Conclusions: Broad enthusiasm for BL TDM among participants was found. Prior literature suggested that assay availability was the primary barrier to implementation; however, the data revealed many more individual and organizational attributes, which impacted the BL TDM implementation. Internalization should particularly be focused on to improve the adoption of this evidence-based practice.

Abstract Background Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected people worldwide. Patients with HIV who have latent TB are 20-30 times more likely to develop active TB. Integrated antiretroviral therapy (ART) early in the treatment for tuberculosis is recommended due to improved morbidity and mortality, however, there can be serious drug interactions. Rifamycins are potent inducers of the CYP3A4 isoform, which can cause sub-therapeutic concentrations of anti-retroviral drugs, among these, rifabutin (RBN) is a less potent inducer of CYP3A4. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies done on healthy adults showed that rifampin decreased dolutegravir (DTG) concentrations by more than 50 % whereas RBN decreased it by 30%. RBN has been preferred given that its favorable pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile. Currently there are no studies examining the use of RBN and DTG in co-infected persons. This is a case series of 4 co-infected patients receiving both agents who underwent PK analysis. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients in the respiratory care unit (RCU) at Jackson Memorial Hospital in Miami. We included adult patients, admitted to the RCU, with a concomitant diagnosis of HIV and active TB disease who received DTG and RBN, and for which DTG and RBN plasma concentrations were measured for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). A non-compartmental analysis was performed and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated for DTG and RBN. Results We report 4 patients (Figure 1) that met criteria and underwent PK analysis. All patients with TB who were treated with RBN had low concentrations of DTG, requiring higher doses of DTG (Table 1 & 2). After adjustments based on PK analysis, there was evidence of a favorable response to treatment in 2 patients, with a less than robust in the 2 others. Adequate suppression of viral load could not be determined for 3 of the patients because of the short observation time. Figure 1:Timelines of patients describing admission and HIV and tuberculosis treatment providedDTG, dolutegravir. RFB, rifabutin. VL, viral load. AFB, Acid fast bacilli. LAD, lymphadenopathy. TAF, Tenofovir alafenamide. FTC, Emtricitabine. TDF, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate. INH, Isoniazid. PYZ, Pyrazinamide. BID, twice a day. QD, daily. IRIS, Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. GU, genitourinary. TB, tuberculosis.Table 1:Patients’ pharmacokinetics of DTGAUCX-Y, area under the concentration-time curve from time X to Y hours; AUC0-tau, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval; DTG, dolutegravir; TDM, therapeutic drug monitoring. a) AUC0-6 was calculated.Table 2:Patients’ pharmacokinetics of RBNAUCX-Y, area under the concentration-time curve from time X to Y hours; AUC0-tau, area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the end of the dosing interval; RBN, Rifabutin; TDM, therapeutic drug monitoring. a) All RBN doses given every 24 hours, b) RBN value was trace and AUC was not calculated. Conclusion All patients with HIV and TB who were treated with RBN had low concentrations of DTG. This case series demonstrates that for optimal concomitant use of rifabutin and dolutegravir it is highly recommended to use TDM. Prospective clinical studies are needed to further determine the PK interactions between RBN and DTG and virologic response to treatment. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Abstract Background Beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (BL TDM; drug level testing) can facilitate improved outcomes in critically ill patients. Yet less than 20% of hospitals have implemented BL TDM. The purpose of this study was to characterize provider perceptions and key considerations for successful implementation of BL TDM. Methods This was a sequential mixed methods study from 2020 to 2021 of stakeholders at three academic medical centers with varying degrees of BL TDM implementation - Mayo Clinic (BL TDM not implemented), University of Florida Health Shands (partially implemented), and Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital (fully implemented). Stakeholders completed a survey to characterize their knowledge, perceptions, and experience with BL TDM. A diverse group of 30 respondents were then purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews. Results from the two strands were integrated, themes were identified, and findings were situated within implementation science frameworks. Results Among the 138 survey respondents (22% response rate), the majority were physicians (38%) and pharmacists (33%). 71% practiced in critical care and 21% in infectious diseases. The majority of respondents felt BL TDM was relevant to their practice and improved medication effectiveness and safety (Figure 1). Two implementation themes were identified: individual internalization and organizational features. Individuals needed to internalize, make sense of, and agree to BL TDM implementation which was positively influenced by repeated exposure to evidence and expertise. The process of internalization seemed more complex with BL TDM than with other antibiotics (i.e., vancomycin). Organizational considerations relevant to BL TDM implementation included adequate physical and informational infrastructure, access to trained personnel, supportive governance/leadership, and robust process and workflow development. Conclusion We found broad enthusiasm about the relevance and potential benefits of BL TDM among stakeholders. Prior literature suggested the primary barrier to implementation was assay availability, but we identified many more individual and organizational attributes which impacted the scale and spread of BL TDM. Disclosures Sara Ausman, PharmD, Gilead: Honoraria Christina G. Rivera, PharmD, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Gilead: Honoraria|Insmed: Honoraria Jason Roberts, BPharm(Hons), PhD, FSHP, FISAC, British Society of Chemotherapy: Grant/Research Support|Cipla: Honoraria|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Advisor/Consultant|MSD: Honoraria|Pfizer: Board Member|Pfizer: Honoraria|Qpex: Grant/Research Support|Sandoz: Board Member|Summit: Advisor/Consultant|Wolters Kluwer: Advisor/Consultant Marc H. Scheetz, PharmD, MSc, Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Allecra: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Nevakar: Advisor/Consultant|Nevakar: Grant/Research Support|Premier Healthcare Solutions: Honoraria|Spero: Advisor/Consultant|SuperTrans Medical: Advisor/Consultant|SuperTrans Medical: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Third Pole Therapeutics: Advisor/Consultant.

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected people worldwide. Currently there are no studies examining the use of Rifabutin (RBN) and Dolutegravir (DTG) in co-infected persons. This is a case series of 4 co-infected patients receiving both agents who underwent Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. Methods and Results: This is a retrospective chart review study of four patients diagnosed with both HIV and TB, receiving RBN and DTG and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring. All 4 cases had lower than expected DTG concentrations at least once, including those on the current recommended dose of DTG with RBN, and even those receiving higher doses. Conclusions: Given the frequency of low DTG and RBN concentrations, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for these drugs is advisable. Prospective clinical studies are needed to further determine the PK interactions between RBN and DTG, and virologic response to treatment.