Zysek, Victoria

Objectives: To assess compliance with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) secondary prevention guidelines in the USA, to determine time trends, and to identify potential sociodemographic predictors of low compliance. Design, Setting and Participants: We analyzed the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 1999 to 2010, representative of non-institutionalized civilian population in the USA. We included people with self-reported previous diagnosis of CAD, angina or myocardial infarction (MI). Primary Outcome: Adherence to secondary prevention guidelines including blood pressure control, lipid control, not smoking, normal body mass index, physical activity at goal, and meeting all 5 outcomes (“all-or-none”). Use of antiplatelet therapy was reported and analyzed from 1999-2004. Secondary Outcome: Use of beta-blocker therapy in people with history of MI; in diabetes (DM), use of ACE-inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker, and HgbA1C <7%. Age, gender, race, income, education and insurance status were evaluated as covariates. Analyses were weighed according to Center for Disease Control guidelines. Results: There were 62,160 individuals in the cycle data of which 2,615 comprised the study group, representative of 73,574,548 individuals in the USA. Mean age was 65 yr, 58% men, 79% white. Only 2.8% of people with CAD met all 5 main outcomes. Only blood pressure and LDL control showed significant improvement over time, see Figure. Antiplatelet therapy was reported in 58.2%. Of those with history of MI, only 50.5% were on a beta-blocker and of those with history of DM, 59.4% were using either an ACE-I or an ARB; and 54% had a HgbA1C less than 7%. When adjusting for demographics, no significant differences were found regarding compliance with all 5 main outcomes. Conclusions: Adherence to guidelines for secondary prevention of CAD is suboptimal. There is an immense opportunity for improvement in secondary prevention for CAD in the USA.

Background: Participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been shown to decrease mortality following acute myocardial infarction (MI), but its impact on rehospitalizations requires examination. Methods: We included patients who were hospitalized with first-ever MI in Olmsted County Minnesota from 1987-2010 and survived to hospital discharge. Participation in CR within the first 30 days following MI was determined using billing data and was analyzed as a time-dependent covariate. The association between CR participation and all-cause rehospitalization was analyzed using Andersen-Gill models to account for repeated events. As CR participation is a non-randomized intervention, we adjusted for propensity to participate after fitting a logistic regression model using 13 factors significantly associated with participation on univariate analysis. Patients were censored at the time of death or last follow-up. Results: Among 2991 patients (mean age 67 years, 59% male, 31% ST elevation MI), 1480 (49%) participated in CR following acute MI hospital discharge (first session occurred at a mean of 9 days post-discharge). Most patients (75%) were rehospitalized at least once during a mean follow-up of 7.6 years, and CR participation was associated with reduced risk of rehospitalization. The rehospitalization rates were 39% and 59% at one year for participants and non-participants, respectively. In unadjusted analysis, CR participation was associated with a markedly decreased risk of rehospitalization (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.49-0.53, p<0.001). After adjusting for propensity to participate, the association between CR participation and all-cause rehospitalization persisted (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.67-0.73, p<0.001). Conclusions: CR participation is associated with a markedly reduced risk of rehospitalization after incident MI. In addition to reducing mortality, improving CR participation rates may have a large impact post-MI healthcare resource use.

Introduction: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an effective but highly underutilized therapy for heart disease. Efforts are underway to increase CR referral and enrollment, but little is known about the potential capacity for growth in CR utilization in the United States. To address this concern, we estimated the current national capacity of CR programs across the United States and assessed obstacles to potential growth. Methods: We surveyed all CR Program Directors listed in the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR) database in November of 2012. Respondents reported current enrollment levels, current program capacity, program capacity given reasonable expansion, and obstacles to growth. Results: Of 812 Program Directors in the AACVPR database, 290 (36%) completed the full survey. Respondents represented somewhat larger programs compared to non-respondents (4.0 vs. 4.6 full time employees, p = 0.01), but were otherwise similar. Current enrollment levels demonstrated a median [IQ range] of 140 [75,232] patients per year and a current estimated capacity of 192 [100,300] patient per year. Respondents estimated that programs could expand services by 25% to 240 [141,380] patients annually, assuming a significant increase in patient demand and a feasible increase in resources. We estimate that if programs filled to their current capacity, national CR utilization rates would increase from 34.7% to 46.4% (95% CI, 43.9 to 48.9) of eligible US patients each year. Given feasible program expansion, utilization could increase to a maximum of 58.4% (95% CI, 55.2 to 61.6) of qualifying patients. Capacity projections based upon absolute patient numbers and national statistics revealed concordant results. The most commonly cited obstacles to increasing patient participation are shown in the figure. As seen, the majority (88%) are controllable system-related factors unrelated to patient behavior. Conclusions: Even with substantial expansion of all existing CR programs, there is currently insufficient capacity in current CR programs to meet national service needs. Solutions to this problem will likely include the creation of new CR programs, and new policies that improve reimbursement for CR and also embrace new models of CR delivery.