Back to Authors

Cosmo, Salvatore De

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8787-8286

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 4

A Reliable and Reproducible Test for Adequate Glucose Counterregulation in Type I Diabetes Mellitus
Bolli, G B, Feo, Pierpaolo De , Cosmo, Salvatore De , Perriello, G. , Ventura, M. M., Benedetti, M. Massi, Santeusanio, Fausto, Gerich, John E., Brunetti, P.

Diabetes | September 19, 2013 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 732-737

10.2337/diab.33.8.732 Get It

The safety, reproducibility, and reliability of an insulin infusion test for assessment of adequate glucose counterregulation were evaluated in 18 patients with type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. When the test (a 60-min, 30-mU/m2/min insulin infusion) was administered on three separate occasions at 3–4-wk intervals, coefficients of variation for plasma glucose and counterregulatory hormone (glucagon, epinephrine, cortisol, and growth hormone) responses averaged less than 8%. No patient experienced symptoms requiring discontinuation of the test and plasma glucose concentrations increased spontaneously after stopping the insulin infusion. Using objective criteria based on plasma glucose nadirs or postnadir rates of plasma glucose recovery, no patient judged to have adequate glucose counterregulation by the test (post-nadir rates of plasma glucose recovery or plasma glucose nadir above 0.4 mg/dl/min and 45 mg/dl) developed severe hypoglycemia (plasma glucose < 40 mg/dl) during up to 7 mo of intensive insulin therapy, whereas nearly all patients with inadequate counter-regulation did. We conclude that this test, when performed in standardized conditions, is safe and reproducible and can reliably predict those patients with type I diabetes who are at risk of developing severe hypoglycemia during intensive insulin therapy.
Effects of Long-Term Optimization and Short-Term Deterioration of Glycemic Control on Glucose Counterregulation in Type I Diabetes Mellitus
Bolli, Geremia B. , Feo, Pierpaolo De , Cosmo, Salvatore De , Perriello, G. , Angeletti, G, Ventura, Maria Rosa, Santeusanio, Fausto, Brunetti, Paolo, Gerich, John E.

Diabetes | September 19, 2013 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 394-400

10.2337/diab.33.4.394 Get It

To assess the effects of glycemie control on glucose counterregulation, rates of plasma glucose recovery from hypoglycemia and counterregulatory hormonal responses were studied in 18 C-peptide-negative patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) before and after either improvement, no change, or deterioration in glycemic control. Hypoglycemia was induced by an i.v. insulin infusion (30 mU/m2 · min for 1 h) after maintenance of euglycemia overnight with i.v. insulin. In 13 patients with long duration of IDDM (9 ± 0.5 yr, mean ± SEM) and initially poor glycemic control (mean diurnal blood glucose, MBG 199 ± 8 mg/dl, ketoamine-HbA1 12.4 ± 0.2%; nondiabetic subjects 104 ± 4 mg/dl and 6.8 ± 0.09%, respectively), rates of plasma glucose recovery from hypoglycemia (0.30 ± 0.01 versus 0.60 ± 0.01 mg/dl · min in nondiabetic subjects, P < 0.001) and plasma glucagon (AUC 0.56 ± 0.09 versus 6.3 ± 0.50 ng/ml ·150 min in non-diabetic subjects, P < 0.01) and epinephrine (AUC 16.9 ± 0.2 versus 25.7 ± 0.2 ng/ml 150 min in nondiabetic subjects, P < 0.001) responses to hypoglycemia were impaired. Intensive therapy (three daily injections of insulin) instituted in 7 out of 13 IDDM patients for up to 9 mo improved MBG (124 ± 6 mg/dl, P < 0.01) and ketoamine-HbA1 (7.9 ± 0.02%, P < 0.01) but not rates of plasma glucose recovery (0.31 ± 0.01 mg/dl · min) and plasma glucagon (AUC 0.69 ± 0.07 ng/ml · 150 min) and epinephrine (AUC 14.9 ± 0.17 ng/ml ·150 min) responses. Similarly, no changes in glucose counterregulation were observed in the six IDDM patients in whom glycemic control was poorly maintained for 6–8 mo (MBG 201 ± 7 mg/dl, ketoamine-HbA112.3 ± 0.2%). In five patients with short duration of IDDM (11 ± 0.5 mo) and optimized glycemic control (MBG 131 ± 8 mg/dl, ketoamine-HbA1 7.9 ± 0.2%), rates of plasma glucose recovery, as well as counterregulatory responses of plasma glucagon and epinephrine, were normal. Neither deterioration of glycemic control for 2 wk (MBG 229 ± 12 mg/dl, ketoamine-HbA1 9.1 ± 0.2%) nor its improvement over the 2 subsequent wk (MBG 120 ± 8 mg/dl, ketoamine-HbA1 8.5 ± 0.2%) resulted in any significant change in glucose counterregulation. It is concluded that near-normalization of glycemic control for up to 9 mo is insufficient to reverse the impairment in glucose counterregulation found in long-term IDDM. Short-term deterioration in glycemic control, when not accompanied by alterations in counterregulatory hormone secretion, does not impair glucose counterregulation.
Demonstration of a Dawn Phenomenon in Normal Human Volunteers
Bolli, Geremia B, Feo, Pierpaolo De , Cosmo, Salvatore De , Perriello, G. , Ventura, M. M., Calcinaro, Filippo, Lolli, Claudio, Campbell, Peter J. , Brunetti, Paolo, Gerich, John E, Bolli, Geremia B, Lolli, Claudio, Brunetti, Paolo, Gerich, John E

Diabetes | September 19, 2013 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1150-1153

10.2337/diab.33.12.1150 Get It

To ascertain whether the dawn phenomenon occurs in nondiabetic individuals and, if so, whether it is due to an increase in glucose production or a decrease in glucose utilization, we determined plasma concentrations of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and counter regulatory hormones, as well as rates of glucose production, glucose utilization, and insulin secretion at one-halfhourly intervals between 1:00 and 9:00 a.m. in eight normal volunteers. After 5:30 a.m., plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide concentrations all increased significantly; rates of glucose production, glucose utilization, and insulin secretion also increased (all P < 0.05). Plasma cortisol, epinephrine, and norepinephrine increased significantly from nocturnal nadirs between 4:00 and 6:30 a.m. Plasma growth hormone, which had increased episodically between 1:00 and 4:30 a.m., decreased thereafter nearly 50% (P < 0.05). Plasma glucagon did not change significantly throughout the period of observation. These results indicate that a dawn-like phenomenon, initiated by an increase in glucose production, occurs in nondiabetic individuals. Thus, early morning increases in plasma glucose concentrations and insulin requirements observed in IDDM and NIDDM may be an exaggeration of a physiologic circadian variation in hepatic insulin sensitivity induced by antecedent changes in catecholamine and/or growth hormone secretion.
The Adrenergic Contribution to Glucose Counterregulation in Type I Diabetes Mellitus: Dependency on A-Cell Function and Mediation Through Beta2-Adrenergic Receptors
Feo, Pierpaolo De , Bolli, Geremia B. , Perriello, G. , Compagnucci, P., Angeletti, G, Santeusanio, Fausto, Gerich, John E., Motulese, Mario, Brunetti, Paolo, Cosmo, Salvatore De

Diabetes | September 19, 2013 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 887-893

10.2337/diab.32.10.887 Get It

In order to assess the adrenergic contribution to hypoglycemie glucose counterregulation in type | diabetes mellitus and to determine whether the adrenergic contribution is mediated through beta1- or beta2-adrenergic receptors, hypoglycemia was induced by an i.v. insulin infusion (30 mU/m2 · min) for 60 min in 11 insulin-dependent diabetic patients (IDDM), 5 with normal plasma glucagon responses and 6 with blunted responses, and also in 7 age-weight-matched nondiabetic subjects. Rates of plasma glucose decrease and postnadir increase, as well as plasma concentrations of free insulin and of counterregulatory hormones, were measured when insulin was infused alone, and when insulin was infused along with propranolol (a beta1- and beta2-adrenergic receptor antagonist) or metoprolol (a selective beta1-antagonist). Postnadir plasma glucose recovery was decreased in IDDM with blunted plasma glucagon responses (21 ± 0.8 µmol. L−1 min−1, P < 0.001), but was normal in patients with normal plasma glucagon responses (30 ± 0.4 versus 33 ± 0.5 μmol · L−1 · min−1 in nondiabetic subjects, P = NS). Postnadir plasma glucose recovery was not affected by either propranolol or metoprolol in normal subjects and in IDDM with normal glucagon responses. However, in IDDM with blunted plasma glucagon responses, postnadir plasma glucose recovery was further decreased by propranolol (14 ± 0.6 µmol. L−1 min1, P < 0.01), but was unaffected by metoprolol (22 ± 0.9 μmol. L 1 min1, P = NS). These results demonstrate that, as in normal man, adrenergic mechanisms are not essential for normal plasma glucose recovery from hypoglycemia in IDDM with normal plasma glucagon responses. However, in IDDM with blunted plasma glucagon responses, adrenergic mechanisms become important for glucose counterregulation although they do not fully compensate for the blunted plasma glucagon responses. Since propranolol delayed plasma glucose recovery from hypoglycemia in IDDM with blunted glucagon responses but metoprolol had no effect, the adrenergic contribution to glucose counterregulation appears to be mediated through beta2-adrenergic receptors.