Hughes, Caren

Introduction: Pharmacogenomics is about selecting the “right drug in the right amount for the right patient.” In metastatic colorectal cancer, germline pharmacogenomics testing presents a unique opportunity to improve outcomes, since the genes dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase metabolizing the chemotherapy drugs, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan are already well known. In a retrospective analysis of the landmark TRIBE clinical trial [(TRIBE - TRIplet plus BEvacizumab multicenter, phase III trial by the Italian Cooperative GONO (Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest) group (NCT00719797)], the proportion of patients with serious adverse events was higher in those with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase/UDP-glucuronosyltransferase aberrations and was dose dependent. We aimed to report on the feasibility and the results of incorporating pharmacogenomics testing into clinical practice. Methods: As a quality improvement initiative and a center of individualized medicine grant, we integrated the use of OneOme RightMed comprehensive test, which reports on 27 genes related to pharmacogenomics and over 300 medications of interest. We limited initial testing to patients with colorectal cancer. Pharmacists provided dosage recommendations based on test results in real-time. Results: At our cancer center, 155 patients underwent pharmacogenomics testing from November 2017 to January 2019. Results were available within 3 to 5 days of testing for most patients and were integrated into treatment decision-making. Of 155 sampled participants, a total of 89 (57.4%) participants had an UGT1A1 variant genotype, NM_000463.2: c.-53_-52[8] *1/*28, n = 74 (47.7%); *28/*28, n = 15 (9.7%). Additionally, 4 (2.6%) participants were heterozygous for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. Two (1.3%) individuals were heterozygous for both UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genes. All (100%) the patients had at least 1 actionable aberration related to supportive care medications ( CYP-family) of all the possible medications listed on their pharmacogenomics report. Conclusion: Preemptive comprehensive pharmacogenomics testing can be integrated into clinical practice in real-time for patients with cancer given faster turnaround and low cost. Pharmacist-driven, patient-specific medication management consults add further value given the number of genes/drugs. This sets the stage for a prospective randomized clinical trial to demonstrate the amount of benefit this can result in these patients.

703 Background: In metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), pharmacogenomics (PGx) testing presents a unique opportunity to improve outcomes since the genes DPYD & UGT1A1 encoding the enzymes metabolizing the chemotherapy drugs, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan, are already well known. In the TRIBE clinical trial, proportion of patients with serious adverse events (SAEs) was higher in those with DPYD/UGT1A1 aberrations and were dose dependent. Critical barrier has been integration into clinical practice. We aimed to report on the feasibility and results of incorporating PGx testing into clinical practice. Methods: As a quality improvement initiative, we integrated the use of OneOme RightMed comprehensive test through funding from our center of individualized medicine, which reports on 28 genes and over 350 medications of interest. Pharmacists provided dosage recommendations based on test results real-time. Results: 126 patients have had the PGx testing since November 2017. Results have been available within 3-5 days. The table outlines the analyzed results thus far of variants in UGT1A1 and the DPYD-genes alongside the CYP450 genes. Of these, 59% had a DPYD/UGT1A1 aberration and 100% had at least one actionable aberration related to supportive care medications from all possible medications listed on their PGx report. Conclusions: Preemptive comprehensive PGx testing can be integrated into clinical practice in real-time for cancer patients. This sets the stage for a prospective randomized clinical trial to demonstrate the amount of benefit this can result in these patients. [Table: see text]

660 Background: Adverse toxicities to chemotherapy remain a limiting factor for patients receiving treatment for malignancies. In gastrointestinal cancers, particularly metastatic colorectal cancer, the majority of front line treatment remains chemotherapy containing 5-fluorouracil and/or irinotecan. One particular cause that can predispose a patient to increased toxicity from 5-fluorouracil is genetic variation in the DPYD gene, as well as TYMS gene. Similarly, genetic variation in the UGT1A1 gene can increase the risk of irinotecan toxicity. These gene variations may have major implications when deciding on treatment regimens for these types of patients; however, they are not routinely checked. Methods: In Mayo Clinic Florida, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving 5-fluorouracil and/or irinotecan chemotherapy during the period of July 2017-July 2018 were tested for genetic variants in DPYD/TYMS and UGT1A1. This testing was done during routine clinic visit either by buccal swab or blood test. The DPYD/TYMS and UGT1A1 variant results were evaluated together with a pharmacist for recommendations regarding dose reductions on 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan respectively. Results: A total of 292 patients were tested. Total number of patients who had a variation in the DPYD/ TYMS and/or UGT1A1 gene was 169 (57.9%). The UGT1A1 variation was the most prevalent with 154 (52.7%) patients having a variant (115 heterozygous variant, 34 homozygous variant and 5 double heterozygous variant). Specifically there were 3 patients with both UGT1A1 and DPYD variants and 3 patients with both UGT1A1 and TYMS variants. One patient had both DPYD and TYMS variations. Conclusions: Routine pharmacogenomic testing for UGT1A1 and DPYD/TYMS genetic variants should be done in all patients receiving irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy respectively. Avoiding or preemptively dose reducing these agents in patients with gene variations may help prevent toxic adverse events and make treatment more tolerable.

814 Background: The importance of pharmacogenomics in optimizing drug doses and avoiding adverse events is increasingly being recognized. The FDA has listed pharmacogenomic biomarkers as part of drug labeling in many medications including chemotherapies such as 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan. Pharmacogenomics may enable selection of the most tolerable treatment without compromising treatment success. Variation in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase ( DPYD) and UGT1A1 gene mutations can increase the risk of 5-FU and irinotecan based chemotherapy respectively. Also, the feasibility of testing in real-time and incorporating results into management has not been demonstrated. The focus of our study was to demonstrate this in the real world scenario as a quality improvement project. Methods: In July-August 2017, 89 patients who were on irinotecan and/or 5-FU chemotherapy were tested for DPYD and UGT1A1 genetic variations at Mayo Clinic Florida. Testing was done through blood sample which was collected at routine clinic visit prior to starting therapy or in patients already receiving chemotherapy. Pharmacy electronic consultation was obtained for recommendations regarding current and/or future chemotherapy regimens, based on pharmacogenomics results. A medication therapy management (MTM) consultation from the pharmacist was incorporated and included into the patient’s chart. Results: Total number of patients who has some variation in the UGT1A1 and/or DPYD gene was 60 (67%). Specifically, there were 12 patients who were homozygous for the UGT1A1 gene and 3 homozygous for DPYD gene. Both genes were affected in 3 patients. One patient was triple heterozygous for DPYD and homozygous for UGT1A1. Pharmacogenomic results were obtained for these patients within 5 business days. Conclusions: A higher prevalence of UGT1A1 and DPYD variants were reported in our patient cohort tested than what is reported in the literature. Additionally, we were able to obtain results for these patients in a timely fashion. This was then further incorporated into medication therapy management consultation from the pharmacist, which added further value.

Objective: To summarize the pharmacology, development, and clinical application of sorafenib, a specific tyrosine kinase and vascular growth factor inhibitor, for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Data Sources: Clinical literature, including both primary studies and review articles, was obtained by searching MEDLINE (1966–May 2006), using the search terms BAY 43-9006, sorafenib, renal cell carcinoma, and tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Additional information was supplied by the manufacturer, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Review articles, abstracts, and clinical studies related to sorafenib were analyzed. An evaluation of the research exploring sorafenib as a potential therapy for RCC was conducted. Relevant information was then selected and is reviewed in this article. Data Synthesis: Knowledge of the cellular abnormalities that can cause solid tumors has led to the development of medications that block these pathways. Sorafenib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that both blocks the Raf kinase pathway and inhibits vascular growth factors. Phase I and II trials have demonstrated that sorafenib has activity against RCC. Dermatologic reactions (rash, desquamation), fatigue, and hypertension have been the most commonly seen treatment-related adverse events. Sorafenib received FDA approval in December 2005 for treatment of advanced RCC. Conclusions: Sorafenib is a novel oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor effective in the treatment of RCC.