Parasramka, Mansi

4567 Background: Trials combining anti-PDL1 and anti-VEGF therapies for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are underway; however the relationship between the expression of PDL1 and genes in the VEGF pathway is poorly understood. Using the Affymetrix platform, we observed an inverse association between the expression of PDL1 and key genes in the VEGF pathway. Herein, we validate this inverse association using an independent set of 100 primary ccRCC tumors. Methods: From our registry database we sampled 100 ccRCC tumors with varying PDL1 protein expression (0%-100%) determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We extracted RNA from FFPE slides and performed RT-PCR to quantify gene expression of PDL1, VEGF, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2. All genes were normalized to the POLR2a gene. We evaluated the association of PDL1 protein expression and VEGF gene expression using Spearman rank correlation. In addition, we employed a linear mixed effects model to compare the fold-change in expression of VEGF genes between PDL1 low (0-5%, n=68) and PDL1 high (>5%, n=32) tumors. Results: As expected, PDL1 protein expression positively correlates with PDL1 geneexpression (corr=0.42, p<0.001). Validating our array data, PDL1 protein expression inversely correlates with expression of key VEGF genes: VEGF (corr=-0.23, p=0.01), VEGFR1 (corr=-0.34, p<0.001), and VEGFR2 (corr=-0.23, p=0.01). In our dichotomized analysis, we noted significantly higher expression of VEGF genes in the PDL1 low compared to the PDL1 high group: VEGF (fold change=1.82, p<0.001), VEGFR1 (FC=2.63, p<0.001), and VEGFR2 (FC=2.13, p=0.001). Conclusions: We independently validate an inverse association between the expression of PDL1 and key genes in the VEGF pathway in primary ccRCC. If validated further in larger studies, the existence of an immune evasive and an angiogenic phenotype within ccRCC could inform current clinical trials targeting these two pathways. Ultimately, whether VEGF signaling affects PDL1 expression, or whether angiogenic or immune evasive phenotypes predict response to anti-PDL1, anti-VEGF, or a combination of the two therapies remains unclear.

e15539 Background: Despite the development of prognostic algorithms based on clinico-pathologic features, the ability to identify aggressive forms of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains suboptimal. Topoisomerase IIA (TOP2a) is a biomarker of DNA replication and a target for antineoplastic agents. Herein, we evaluate the association of TOP2a expression in ccRCC tumors with pathologic features of aggressiveness and risk of cancer-specific death. Methods: We identified 1,380 patients who underwent nephrectomy to treat clinically localized ccRCC between 1/16/1990 and 4/14/2009. TOP2a expression was assessed using IHC and scored as number of positive cells per mm2. We evaluated TOP2a expression using a continuous variable and tertile categories. For associations with pathologic features we employed Kruskal-Wallis tests and for associations with cancer-specific survival we generated Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: HigherTOP2a expression is associated with later stage, higher grade and higher MayoSSIGN score (all p < 0.001). The risk of death from RCC increases with increasing TOP2a expression (p trend < 0.0001), and this association remained strong after after multivariate adjustment for well-known predictors of RCC aggressiveness. Compared to patients in the lowest tertile, those patients with tumors in the highest tertile of TOP2a expression were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=2.62 95% CI 1.95-3.54; p<0.0001). Interestingly, among those patients with low risk disease (SSIGN score 0-3; ~95% 10 year survival), those with high TOP2a were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=3.48 95% CI 1.56-7.76; p =0.002). Conclusions: Higher TOP2a expression is associated with more aggressive pathologic features and increased risk of cancer-specific death among patients undergoing surgery for localized ccRCC. If confirmed, these data support further inquiry for TOP2a as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for ccRCC patients.

Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) and associated inflammation contributes to liver dysfunction and complications after liver surgery and transplantation. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been reported to reduce hepatic IRI because of their reparative immunomodulatory effects in injured tissues. Recent studies have highlighted beneficial effects of extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stem cells (MSC‐EV) on tissue injury. The effects of systemically administered mouse bone marrow–derived MSC‐EV were evaluated in an experimental murine model of hepatic IRI induced by cross‐clamping the hepatic artery and portal vein for 90 minutes followed by reperfusion for periods of up to 6 hours. Compared with controls, intravenous administration of MSC‐EV 30 minutes prior to IRI dramatically reduced the extent of tissue necrosis, decreased caspase 3–positive and apoptotic cells, and reduced serum aminotransferase levels. MSC‐EV increased hepatic messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of NACHT, LRR, and PYD domains‐containing protein 12, and the chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 1, and reduced mRNA expression of several inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 during IRI. MSC‐EV increased cell viability and suppressed both oxidative injury and nuclear factor kappa B activity in murine hepatocytes in vitro. In conclusion, the administration of extracellular vesicles derived from bone marrow–derived MSCs may ameliorate hepatic IRI by reducing hepatic injury through modulation of the inflammatory response.Liver Transplantation 23 791–803 2017 AASLD.

478 Background: Resistance invariably develops in all patients with metastatic ccRCC treated with mTOR inhibitors. Previously we demonstrated that dual inhibition of Hsp90 and the mTOR pathway in lung cancer models leads to synergistic reductions in tumor growth. Herein, we tested the efficacy of ganetespib as a single agent and in combination with mTOR inhibition using in vitro and in vivoccRCC models. Methods: For the in vitro work we utilized the following seven ccRCC cell lines: Caki-1, Caki-2, A-498, A-704, 769-P, 786-O, ACHN. For the in vivo work we used A498 xenografts. In vitro, we determined the single agent EC50 of everolimus and ganetespib at 72 hours by assessing percent viability of A498 cells compared to vehicle using the MTS assay. We then performed combinations of ganetespib and everolimus at EC20, EC30, and EC50 in A498 cells. Translating these studies in vivo, we compared the combinatorial activity of ganetespib and temsirolimus to monotherapy in mice bearing A498 tumor xenografts. Results: As a single agent, all ccRCC cell lines tested were sensitive to ganetespib at nanomolar concentration (EC50 15 – 75 nm) and to everolimus at micromolar concentrations (EC50 4 – 54 mm). In vitro, the combination of ganetespib and everolimus also decreased cell viability in an additive fashion. In vivo, ganetespib and temsirolimus demonstrated comparable single agent activity at sub-MTD doses (T/C = 63 and 60, respectively). Combining ganetespib with temsirolimus improved tumor growth suppression by ~30% (T/C = 43). Conclusions: Given the broad in vitro sensitivity of ccRCC cell lines to single agent ganetespib as well as the in vivo activity of the combination of ganetespib and temsirolimus, we believe ganetespib warrants further study in ccRCC. Updated results will be presented at the conference including the in vivo activity of the combination of ganetespib and antivascular endothelial growth factor agents.

446 Background: Despite the development of prognostic algorithms based on clinico-pathologic features, the ability to identify aggressive forms of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains suboptimal. Topoisomerase IIA (TOP2a) is a biomarker of DNA replication and a target for antineoplastic agents. Herein, we evaluate the association of TOP2a expression in ccRCC tumors with pathologic features of aggressiveness and risk of cancer-specific death. Methods: We identified 947 patients who underwent nephrectomy to treat clinically localized ccRCC between January 16, 1990, and September 27, 2006. TOP2a expression was assessed using IHC and scored as number of positive cells per mm2. We evaluated TOP2a expression using a continuous variable and tertile categories. For associations with pathologic features, we employed Kruskal-Wallis tests and for associations with cancer-specific survival, we generated Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: HigherTOP2a expression is associated with later stage, higher grade and higher Mayo SSIGN score (all p < 0.001). The risk of death from RCC increases with increasing TOP2a expression (p trend < 0.0001). Compared to patients in the lowest tertile, those patients with tumors in the highest tertile of TOP2a expression were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=2.31 95% CI 1.64-3.25; p < 0.0001). Interestingly, among those patients with low risk disease (SSIGN score 0-3; ~95% 10 year survival), those with high TOP2a were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=3.09 95% CI 1.29-7.40; p = 0.01). Conclusions: Higher TOP2a expression is associated with more aggressive pathologic features and increased risk of cancer-specific death among patients undergoing surgery for localized ccRCC. If confirmed, these data support further inquiry for TOP2a as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for ccRCC patients.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound vesicles that are released by cells into their extracellular environment, have selective enrichment of specific proteins and RNA, and can mediate intercellular communication. In this review we highlight recent observations of the role of EVs in liver injury, viral hepatitis, alcoholic or nonalcoholic liver disease, biliary tract disease, and liver cancers. Potential applications as markers of diseases or for therapeutic applications are outlined to emphasize the new opportunities that are arising from the study of EVs.

AbstractExtracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane‐bound vesicles released from cells into the extracellular environment. There is emerging interest in the use of EVs as potential therapeutic interventions. We sought to evaluate the safety of EVs that may be therapeutically used by performing in vitro toxicological assessments. EVs were obtained from mesenchymal stem cells (MSC‐EV) or from bovine milk (BM‐EV) by differential ultracentrifugation, and quantitated using nanoparticle tracking analysis. Genotoxic effects, hematological effects, immunological effects and endotoxin production were evaluated at two dose levels. Neither MSC‐EVs nor BM‐EVs elicited detectable genotoxic effects using either the alkaline comet assay or micronucleus assay. Hemolysis was observed with BM‐EVs but not with MSC‐EVs. MSC‐EVs did not have any significant effect on either spontaneous or collagen‐induced platelet aggregation. In contrast, BM‐EVs were noted to increase collagen‐induced platelet aggregation, even though no spontaneous increase in platelet aggregation was noted. Both types of EVs induced leukocyte proliferation, which was greater with BM‐EV. Neither MSC‐EVs nor BM‐EVs induced HL‐60 phagocytosis, although BM‐EVs decreased zymosan‐induced phagocytosis. Furthermore, neither MSC‐EVs nor BM‐EVs induced nitric oxide production. Unlike MSC‐EVs, BM‐EVs tested positive for endotoxin and induced complement activation. There are significant differences in toxicological profiles between MSC‐EVs and BM‐EVs that may reflect variations in techniques for EV isolation, EV content or cross‐species differences. The safety of MSC‐EV supports their use for disease therapeutics, whereas detailed safety and toxicological assessment will be necessary before the use of BM‐EVs. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.