Back to Authors

Frezzato, Maurizio

Mayo Clinic

Azienda ULSS 8 Berica

Citations 1

RE-MIND: Comparing Tafasitamab + Lenalidomide (L-MIND) with a Real-world Lenalidomide Monotherapy Cohort in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Zinzani, Pier Luigi , Rodgers, Thomas, Marino, Dario , Frezzato, Maurizio, Barbui, Anna Maria, Castellino, Claudia, Meli, Erika, Fowler, Nathan H., Salles, Gilles , Feinberg, Bruce A. , Kurukulasuriya, Nuwan C., Tillmanns, Sascha, Parche, Stephan, Dey, Debarshi, Fingerle-Rowson, Günter, Ambarkhane, Sumeet, Winderlich, Mark, Nowakowski, Grzegorz S., Rodgers, Thomas D. , Feinberg, Bruce , Zinzani, Pier Luigi , Salles, Gilles A , Marino, Dario , Frezzato, Maurizio, Barbui, Anna Maria, Castellino, Claudia, Meli, Erika, Fowler, Nathan H., Kurukulasuriya, Nuwan C., Tillmanns, Sascha, Parche, Stephan, Dey, Debarshi, Fingerle-Rowson, Günter, Ambarkhane, Sumeet, Winderlich, Mark, Nowakowski, Grzegorz S.

Clinical Cancer Research | August 25, 2021 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 22 | Pages: 6124-6134

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1471 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Tafasitamab, an Fc-modified, humanized, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, in combination with lenalidomide, demonstrated efficacy in transplant-ineligible patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), in the single-arm, phase II L-MIND study (NCT02399085). RE-MIND, a retrospective observational study, generated a historic control for L-MIND to delineate the contribution of tafasitamab to the efficacy of the combination. Patients and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from patients with R/R DLBCL treated with lenalidomide monotherapy for comparison with tafasitamab + lenalidomide–treated patients (L-MIND). Key eligibility criteria were aligned with L-MIND. Estimated propensity score–based Nearest Neighbor 1:1 Matching methodology balanced the cohorts for nine prespecified prognostic baseline covariates. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed best overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Data from 490 patients going through lenalidomide monotherapy were collected; 140 qualified for matching with the L-MIND cohort. The primary analysis included 76 patients from each cohort who received a lenalidomide starting dose of 25 mg/day. Cohort baseline covariates were comparable. A significantly better ORR of 67.1% (95% confidence interval, 55.4–77.5) was observed for the combination therapy versus 34.2% (23.7–46.0) for lenalidomide monotherapy [odds ratio, 3.89 (1.90–8.14); P < 0.0001]. Higher CR rates were achieved with combination therapy compared with lenalidomide monotherapy [39.5% (28.4–51.4) vs. 13.2% (6.5–22.9)]. Survival endpoints favored combination therapy. Lenalidomide monotherapy outcomes were similar to previously published data. Conclusions: RE-MIND enabled the estimation of the additional treatment effect achieved by combining tafasitamab with lenalidomide in patients with R/R DLBCL.