Poh, Kian Keong

Abstract Frailty is highly prevalent in cardiovascular disease and associates with poor clinical outcomes. Several cardiovascular conditions benefit from invasive interventions, but the impact of these procedures in frail patients remains unclear. We thus performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize evidence and quantify the pooled effect of clinical outcomes of invasive cardiovascular interventions among frail vs. non-frail patients. Systematic search of two electronic databases from January 2015 to April 2025 was performed including all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies examining outcomes of invasive cardiovascular interventions stratified by frailty. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, and other adverse outcomes. Risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were assessed using random-effects models. Thirty-one studies (10 RCTs, 21 prospective, 3 retrospective studies) with a total of 27 534 participants were included. Compared with non-frail patients, frail patients after cardiovascular procedures were at higher risks of all-cause mortality (RR 3.14, 95% CI: 2.29-4.30), and hospitalizations (RR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.29-2.73). Frail patients undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation and percutaneous mitral-valve interventions did not have significant increased mortality risks compared with non-frail patients (P > 0.05). Pre-frailty predicted lower mortality risks amongst patients undergoing transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (HR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.92). Frail patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction derived similar mortality benefits from an invasive vs. conservative approach (HR 1.13, 95% CI: 0.64-2.01). In conclusion, frailty prognosticates adverse outcomes following invasive cardiovascular interventions and influences treatment efficacy, highlighting its significance in treatment selection

Background: Ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) is common and has an adverse prognosis. We set out to describe the natural history of symptoms and ischemia in INOCA. Methods: CIAO-ISCHEMIA (Changes in Ischemia and Angina over One Year in ISCHEMIA Trial Screen Failures With INOCA) was an international cohort study conducted from 2014 to 2019 involving angina assessments (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) and stress echocardiograms 1 year apart. This was an ancillary study that included patients with a history of angina who were not randomly assigned in the ISCHEMIA trial. Stress-induced wall motion abnormalities were determined by an echocardiographic core laboratory blinded to symptoms, coronary artery disease status, and test timing. Medical therapy was at the discretion of treating physicians. The primary outcome was the correlation between the changes in the Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency score and changes in echocardiographic ischemia. We also analyzed predictors of 1-year changes in both angina and ischemia, and we compared CIAO participants with ISCHEMIA participants with obstructive coronary artery disease who had stress echocardiography before enrollment, as CIAO participants did. Results: INOCA participants in CIAO were more often female (66% of 208 versus 26% of 865 ISCHEMIA participants with obstructive coronary artery disease, P <0.001), but the magnitude of ischemia was similar (median 4 ischemic segments [interquartile range, 3–5] both groups). Ischemia and angina were not significantly correlated at enrollment in CIAO ( P =0.46) or ISCHEMIA stress echocardiography participants ( P =0.35). At 1 year, the stress echocardiogram was normal in half of CIAO participants, and 23% had moderate or severe ischemia (≥3 ischemic segments). Angina improved in 43% and worsened in 14%. Change in ischemia over 1 year was not significantly correlated with change in angina (ρ=0.029). Conclusions: Improvement in ischemia and angina were common in INOCA but not correlated. Our INOCA cohort had a degree of inducible wall motion abnormalities similar to concurrently enrolled ISCHEMIA participants with obstructive coronary artery disease. Our results highlight the complex nature of INOCA pathophysiology and the multifactorial nature of angina. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02347215.