Back to Authors

Abbott, Robert D.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5183-8215

Mayo Clinic

University of Virginia

Citations 2

Catecholamine release, growth hormone secretion, and energy expenditure during exercise vs. recovery in men
Pritzlaff, C. J., Blumer, Jeffrey L., Jensen, Michael D. , Abbott, Robert D. , Veldhuis, Johannes D. , Wideman, Laurie , Gaesser, Glenn A. , Weltman, Arthur

Journal of Applied Physiology | December 23, 2017 | Volume: 89 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 937-946

10.1152/jappl.2000.89.3.937 Get It

We examined the relationship between energy expenditure (in kcal) and epinephrine (Epi), norepinephrine (NE), and growth hormone (GH) release. Ten men [age, 26 yr; height, 178 cm; weight, 81 kg; O2uptake at lactate threshold (LT), 36.3 ml · kg−1 · min−1; peak O2uptake, 49.5 ml · kg−1 · min−1] were tested on six randomly ordered occasions [control, 5 exercise: at 25 and 75% of the difference between LT and rest (0.25LT, 0.75LT), at LT, and at 25 and 75% of the difference between LT and peak (1.25LT, 1.75LT) (0900–0930)]. From 0700 to 1300, blood was sampled and assayed for GH, Epi, and NE. Carbohydrate (CHO) expenditure during exercise and fat expenditure during recovery rose proportionately to increasing exercise intensity ( P = 0.002). Fat expenditure during exercise and CHO expenditure during recovery were not affected by exercise intensity. The relationship between exercise intensity and CHO expenditure during exercise could not be explained by either Epi ( P = 1.00) or NE ( P = 0.922), whereas fat expenditure during recovery increased with Epi and GH independently of exercise intensity ( P = 0.028). When Epi and GH were regressed against fat expenditure during recovery, only GH remained statistically significant ( P < 0.05). We conclude that a positive relationship exists between exercise intensity and both CHO expenditure during exercise and fat expenditure during recovery and that the increase in fat expenditure during recovery with higher exercise intensities is related to GH release.
Research on the Premotor Symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease: Clinical and Etiological Implications
Chen, Honglei , Ross, G. Webster , Huang, Xuemei , Savica, Rodolfo , Abbott, Robert D. , Ascherio, Alberto , Caviness, John N., Gao, Xiang , Gray, Kimberly , Hong, Jau‐Shyong , Kamel, Freya , Jennings, Danna , Kirshner, Annette, Lawler, Cindy P., Liu, Rui , Nussbaum, Robert , Peddada, Shyamal D. , Rick, Amy Comstock, Ritz, Beate , Siderowf, Andrew , Tröster, Alexander I. , Zhang, Jing , Burton, Edward A. , Miller, Gary W. , Tanner, Caroline M.

Environmental Health Perspectives | August 9, 2013 | Volume: 121 | Issue: 11-12 | Pages: 1245-1252

10.1289/ehp.1306967 Get It

Abstract Background: The etiology and natural history of Parkinson’s disease (PD) are not well understood. Some non-motor symptoms such as hyposmia, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, and constipation may develop during the prodromal stage of PD and precede PD diagnosis by years. Objectives: We examined the promise and pitfalls of research on premotor symptoms of PD and developed priorities and strategies to understand their clinical and etiological implications. Methods: This review was based on a workshop, Parkinson’s Disease Premotor Symptom Symposium, held 7–8 June 2012 at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Discussion: Research on premotor symptoms of PD may offer an excellent opportunity to characterize high-risk populations and to better understand PD etiology. Such research may lead to evaluation of novel etiological hypotheses such as the possibility that environmental toxicants or viruses may initiate PD pathogenesis in the gastrointestinal tract or olfactory bulb. At present, our understanding of premotor symptoms of PD is in its infancy and faces many obstacles. These symptoms are often not specific to PD and have low positive predictive value for early PD diagnosis. Further, the pathological bases and biological mechanisms of these premotor symptoms and their relevance to PD pathogenesis are poorly understood. Conclusion: This is an emerging research area with important data gaps to be filled. Future research is needed to understand the prevalence of multiple premotor symptoms and their etiological relevance to PD. Animal experiments and mechanistic studies will further understanding of the biology of these premotor symptoms and test novel etiological hypothesis. Citation: Chen H, Burton EA, Ross GW, Huang X, Savica R, Abbott RD, Ascherio A, Caviness JN, Gao X, Gray KA, Hong JS, Kamel F, Jennings D, Kirshner A, Lawler C, Liu R, Miller GW, Nussbaum R, Peddada SD, Comstock Rick A, Ritz B, Siderowf AD, Tanner CM, Tröster AI, Zhang J. 2013. Research on the premotor symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease: clinical and etiological implications. Environ Health Perspect 121:1245–1252; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1306967