Abel, Katie Van

Abstract Background: HPV16 (human papillomavirus) is a leading cause of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) in the US. Antibodies to HPV16 early antigens are detectable in serum samples up to two decades before diagnosis and are potential biomarkers for early detection. In this study, we have developed and compared three custom HPV16 serology platforms for detection of OPC: MSD (Meso Scale Discovery) electrochemiluminescent detection, RAPID ELISA, and a novel semi-quantitative lateral flow assay (LFA) using a custom android application. Methods: For the MSD platform, recombinant HPV 16 antigens (E1, E2, E6, E7) were synthesized in mammalian cells and printed on multiplexed arrays. In RAPID ELISA, GST-tagged antigens (E1, E2, E6, E7) were expressed using mammalian in vitro transcription and translation and bound IgG detected. For the LFA, His-tagged recombinant proteins (HPV16 CE2 184-365aa and HPV16 E7) were synthesized, printed, and antibodies detected with protein G conjugated nanoparticles. Archived serum samples drawn from newly-diagnosed OPC patients (n = 60), with matching saliva samples (n=54, MSD assay only) were obtained from Mayo Clinic. Unmatched controls (n = 46) were obtained from AT Still. For the lateral flow assay, colorimetric image analysis was done using a titration curve of known concentration of monoclonal antibody. We optimized the biomarker panel (E2, E6, and E7 for MSD and ELISA, and for LFA E2, and E7) by using multiparametric analysis and plotting the receiver operating curves to the test performance, and assays were compared using the Cohen’s kappa statistic. Results: At 98% specificity, the MSD HPV16 serologic assay achieved 88% sensitivity, similar to RAPID ELISA, and the LFA assay at 85% sensitivity. The signal intensities for saliva samples were weaker at 24% sensitivity. The Cohen’s kappa value ranged from 0.74 to 0.78 for the comparison between all three assays. There was only one sample among all the cases that was negative by all three serology tests. Conclusion: All three assays have strong concordance for the detection of HPV16 early antigen serology. All the tests can facilitate large scale HPV serology research. Citation Format: Akshansh Kaushik, David Routman, Tej Patel, Joshua Eger, Padhmavathy Yuvaraj, Kathleen R. Bartemes, Marisa D. Griesel, Danielle E. Hunter, Katie Van Abel, Anu Mathew, Mingyue Wang, Leonid Dzantiev, Martin Stengelin, Jacob N. Wohlstadter, Ann Spolarich, Kristina R. Dahlstrom, Jennifer Blain Christen, Erich Sturgis, Karen Anderson. HPV serology for rapid detection of HPV positive oropharyngeal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 5099.

Objectives/HypothesisTo evaluate the utility of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for staging the neck in the preoperative setting by comparing it to both CT/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathologic staging.Study DesignRetrospective review.MethodsSeventy‐one patients with initial diagnosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma having preoperative MR or CT imaging and PET/CT with subsequent bilateral neck dissection as part of primary treatment (142 neck dissections). Comparison of cervical nodal metastases based on three separate staging systems: preoperative CT and/or MRI scan, preoperative PET/CT, and pathology.ResultsBoth CT/MRI scans and PET/CT scans statistically predicted pathologic outcomes (P = 0.0001, P = 0.0001, respectively) using Chi square analysis. There was a statistically significant improvement in the prediction of true pathologic disease using PET/CT compared to CT and/or MRI alone (P = 0.005). In a subgroup analysis including only the contralateral neck, this significance persisted (P = 0.013). McNemar's test revealed that subsequent detection of bilateral neck disease by PET/CT scan was significantly superior to MRI or CT alone (P = 0.023).ConclusionIn pathologically positive necks, PET/CT was statistically more reliable at identifying positive disease than CT or MRI alone. Furthermore, such a result is achieved without a statistically significant difference in false positivity between PET/CT and CT or MRI. This suggests that PET/CT positivity, despite negative clinical exam and CT/MRI findings, may be more likely to signify pathologic disease and require appropriate treatment.Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 124:159–164, 2014