Back to Authors

Peacock, Justin G.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1510-8367

Mayo Clinic

San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium

Citations 6

Patient exposure in the basic science classroom enhances differential diagnosis formation and clinical decision-making
Grande, Joseph P. , Peacock, Justin G.

No container title available | January 12, 2018 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.7287/peerj.preprints.744v1 Get It

Purpose : The authors proposed that introducing real patients into a pathology classroom early in medical education would help integrate fundamental principles and disease pathology with clinical presentation and medical history. Methods : Three patients with different pathologies described their history and presentation without revealing their diagnosis. Students were required to submit a differential diagnosis in writing, and then they were able to ask questions to arrive at the correct diagnosis. Students were surveyed on the efficacy of patient-based learning. Results : Average student scores on the differential diagnosis assignments significantly improved 32% during the course. From the survey, 72% of students felt that patient encounters should be included in the pathology course next year. 74% felt that the differential diagnosis assignments helped them develop clinical decision-making skills. 73% felt that the experience helped them know what questions to ask patients. 86% felt that they obtained a better understanding of patients’ social and emotional challenges. Discussion : Having students work through the process of differential diagnosis formulation when encountering a real patient and their clinical presentation improved clinical decision-making skills and integrated fundamental concepts with disease pathology during a basic science pathology course. o
Armband activity monitor data do not correlate with reported pain scores in patients receiving vertebroplasty
Peacock, Justin G. , Vine, Roanna , McDonald, Jennifer S, Novotny, Paul J. , Kallmes, David F. , Vine, Roanna L, McDonald, Jennifer S

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | July 28, 2016 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 905-909

10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012174 Get It

Background Prior research on the efficacy of vertebroplasty has focused primarily on subjective, patient-reported outcomes. Objective To apply an armband activity monitor (SenseWear by BodyMedia Inc, USA) to patients presenting for consideration for vertebroplasty and to determine the correlation between patient-reported outcomes and quantitative activity metrics at baseline and 30 days after presentation. Materials and methods Nineteen patients were enrolled (15 receiving vertebroplasty, 4 not receiving vertebroplasty). Patients reported their average pain over the past 24 hours and completed the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire at baseline and 30 days. Patients wore the SenseWear Armband activity monitor for a median of 4 days at baseline and at the 30-day time period to assess steps, metabolic equivalents expended, sedentary activity time, moderate activity time, sleep efficiency, and total sleep time. Pain and disability scores were correlated with activity monitor metrics using linear regression analysis. Results Changes in reported average pain in the past 24 hours and disability scores were not significantly different between vertebroplasty and non-vertebroplasty groups (p>0.05). Changes in activity monitor data were not significantly different between the vertebroplasty and non-vertebroplasty groups (p>0.05). None of the correlations between the reported pain or disability scores and the activity monitor data were significant. Conclusions Activity monitors can be used to objectively record changes in activity following vertebroplasty procedures. Patient-reported pain or disability scores do not correlate with activity monitor-measured activity or sleep metrics.
Risk of Delayed Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinically N0 Esthesioneuroblastoma
Peacock, Justin G. , Harmsen, William S. , Link, Michael J. , Olsen, Kerry D., Garces, Yolanda I. , Wittich, M. Neben, Park, Sean S. , Foote, Robert, Van Gompel, Jamie J, Neben Wittich, Michelle A, Gompel, Jamie J. Van , Giannini, Caterina , Daniel, J. , Park, Sean S

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base | July 6, 2016 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 01 | Pages: 068-074

10.1055/s-0036-1584904 Get It

A flexible, preclinical, medical school curriculum increases student academic productivity and the desire to conduct future research
Peacock, Justin G. , Grande, Joseph P.

Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education | July 6, 2015 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 384-390

10.1002/bmb.20875 Get It

AbstractIn 2006, small blocks of flexible curriculum time, termed selectives, were implemented in the Mayo Medical School preclinical curriculum. Selectives permitted students to pursue professional endeavors, such as research, service, and career exploration, in the preclinical years. The purpose of this study was to survey current and former Mayo medical students regarding the impact of selectives on their research interest and productivity. The authors surveyed 377 current and former Mayo Medical School students from the 2004 to 2014 graduating classes, 154 participants (41% response rate) responded to the survey. The classes were grouped into pre‐ and postselective groups for the comparison studies. Postselective students published significantly more (p = 0.003) and gave significantly more presentations (p = 0.0007) during medical school than preselective students. Thirty‐four (72% of the postselective respondents) indicated that selectives had a strong or very strong impact on their current research interest. Respondents spent an average of 4.0 [3.0–5.0] weeks of Selective time on research, resulting in 1.8 [1.4–2.2] publications and 1.8 [1.4–2.2] presentations, which represented 52.5% [40.0–65.0%] and 47.3% [37.1–57.4%] of the students’ total medical school publications and presentations, respectively. Flexible selective time during the preclinical years results in significantly more medical student academic productivity. © 2015 by The International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 43(5):384–390, 2015.
Patient exposure in the basic science classroom enhances differential diagnosis formation and clinical decision-making
Peacock, Justin G. , Grande, Joseph P.

PeerJ | February 26, 2015 | Volume: 3 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: e809

10.7717/peerj.809 Get It

Radiotherapy for Metastatic Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Peacock, Justin G. , Call, Jason A., Olivier, Kenneth R.

Rare Tumors | July 29, 2013 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 101-102

10.4081/rt.2013.e28 Get It

Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FLHCC) is a rare variant of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that commonly affects young individuals without a prior history of liver disease. FLHCC commonly results in a better prognosis than HCC; however, the risk of recurrence and metastatic disease is high. FLHCC is typically treated by primary resection of the tumor with 50-75% cure rates. The use of radiation therapy in FLHCC has not been assessed on its own, and may show some success in a very few reported combination therapy cases. We report on the successful use of radiation therapy in a case of metastatic FLHCC to the lung following primary and secondary resections. Our treatment of the large, metastatic, pulmonary FLHCC tumor with 40 Gy in 10 fractions resulted in an 85.9% tumor volume decrease over six months. This suggests FLHCC may be a radiosensitive tumor and radiotherapy may be valuable in unresectable or metastatic tumors.