Back to Authors

Standifer, Nathan E.

0000-0002-9328-1889

Mayo Clinic

AstraZeneca, South San Francisco, CA

Citations 2

Safety, Efficacy, and Pharmacodynamics of Tremelimumab Plus Durvalumab for Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Randomized Expansion of a Phase I/II Study
Kelley, Robin Kate , Harris, William Proctor , Ikeda, Masafumi , Okusaka, Takuji , Kang, Yoon‐Koo , Qin, Shukui , Tai, David , Lim, Ho Yeong , Yong, Wei Peng , Cheng, Ann‐Lii , Gasbarrini, Antonio , Damian, Silvia , Bruix, Jordi , Bendell, Johanna C. , Kim, Tae‐You , He, Philip , Makowsky, Mallory, Negro, Alejandra , Gasbarrini, Antonio , Ikeda, Masafumi , Okusaka, Takuji , Kang, Yoon-Koo , Qin, Shukui , Tai, David W-M , Lim, Ho Yeong , Yong, Wei-Peng , Cheng, Ann-Lii , Damian, Silvia , Borad, Mitesh J , He, Philip , Kudo, Masatoshi , Abou-Alfa, Ghassan K , Bruix, Jordi , Sangro, Bruno , Yau, Thomas , Borad, Mitesh J. , Standifer, Nathan E. , Kudo, Masatoshi , Abou‐Alfa, Ghassan K.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | July 22, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 27 | Pages: 2991-3001

10.1200/jco.20.03555 Get It

PURPOSE This phase I/II study evaluated tremelimumab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen-4 monoclonal antibody) and durvalumab (antiprogrammed death ligand-1 monoclonal antibody) as monotherapies and in combination for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including a novel regimen featuring a single, priming dose of tremelimumab (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02519348 ). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with HCC who had progressed on, were intolerant to, or refused sorafenib were randomly assigned to receive T300 + D (tremelimumab 300 mg plus durvalumab 1,500 mg [one dose each during the first cycle] followed by durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks), durvalumab monotherapy (1,500 mg once every 4 weeks), tremelimumab monotherapy (750 mg once every 4 weeks [seven doses] and then once every 12 weeks), or T75 + D (tremelimumab 75 mg once every 4 weeks plus durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks [four doses] followed by durvalumab 1,500 mg once every 4 weeks). Safety was the primary end point. Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 and overall survival; exploratory end points included circulating lymphocyte profiles. RESULTS A total of 332 patients were enrolled (T300 + D, n = 75; durvalumab, n = 104; tremelimumab, n = 69; and T75 + D, n = 84). Tolerability was acceptable across arms, with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurring in 37.8%, 20.8%, 43.5%, and 24.4%, respectively. Confirmed ORRs (95% CI) were 24.0% (14.9 to 35.3), 10.6% (5.4 to 18.1), 7.2% (2.4 to 16.1), and 9.5% (4.2 to 17.9), respectively. An early expansion of CD8+ lymphocytes was associated with response across arms, with highest proliferating CD8+ lymphocyte levels occurring in the T300 + D arm. The median (95% CI) overall survival was 18.7 (10.8 to 27.3), 13.6 (8.7 to 17.6), 15.1 (11.3 to 20.5), and 11.3 (8.4 to 15.0) months in the T300 + D, durvalumab, tremelimumab, and T75 + D arms, respectively. CONCLUSION All regimens were found to be tolerable and clinically active; however, the T300 + D regimen demonstrated the most encouraging benefit-risk profile. The unique pharmacodynamic activity and association with ORR of the T300 + D regimen further support its continued evaluation in HCC.
Safety and Clinical Activity of MEDI1873, a Novel GITR Agonist, in Advanced Solid Tumors
Balmanoukian, Ani Sarkis, Infante, Jeffrey R., Aljumaily, Raid, Naing, Aung , Rizvi, Naiyer A. , Ross, Helen J. , Mallinder, Philip R., Elgeioushi, Nairouz , González, Ignacio Ferreira , Cann, Jennifer , Durham, Nicholas M. , Rahimian, Shahram, Kumar, Rakesh , Denlinger, Crystal S. , Infante, Jon , Rizvi, Naiyer A , González-García, Ignacio , Cann, Jennifer , Kumar, Rakesh , Denlinger, Crystal S , Infante, Jon , Chintakuntlawar, Ashish V. , Gordon, Michael S. , Standifer, Nathan E.

Clinical Cancer Research | September 4, 2020 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 6196-6203

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0452 Get It

Abstract Purpose: The safety and preliminary efficacy of MEDI1873, an agonistic IgG1 fusion protein targeting glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor–related protein (GITR), were evaluated in an open-label, first-in-human, phase I, dose escalation study in previously treated patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: Two single-patient cohorts at 1.5 and 3 mg i.v. were followed by 3+3 dose escalation in six cohorts at 7.5, 25, 75, 250, 500, and 750 mg, all every 2 weeks, for up to 52 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and MTD. Secondary endpoints included antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics. Results: Forty patients received MEDI1873. Three experienced DLTs: grade 3 worsening tumor pain (250 mg); grade 3 nausea, vomiting, and headache (500 mg); and grade 3 non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (750 mg). An MTD was not reached and treatment was well tolerated up to 500 mg. Most common treatment-related adverse events were headache (25%), infusion-related reaction (17.5%), and decreased appetite (17.5%). MEDI1873 exposure was dose proportional. Antidrug–antibody incidence was low. MEDI1873 increased peripheral CD4+ effector memory T-cell proliferation as well as cytokines associated with effector T-cell activation at dose levels ≥75 mg. The best response was stable disease (SD) in 17 patients (42.5%), including 1 unconfirmed partial response. Eight patients (20.0%) had SD ≥24 weeks. Conclusions: MEDI1873 showed acceptable safety up to 500 mg i.v. every 2 weeks with pharmacodynamics activity, and prolonged SD in some patients. However, further development is not planned because of lack of demonstrated tumor response.