Zinzani, Pier Luigi

TPS7583 Background: Covalent (c) Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have reshaped the treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and are now often used as initial therapy. The MURANO study established 2-year fixed duration venetoclax plus rituximab as a standard of care regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL. However, its efficacy has not been formally assessed in CLL/SLL patients treated with a cBTKi, a common setting where this regimen is used in contemporary practice. Pirtobrutinib, a highly selective, non-covalent (reversible) BTKi, inhibits both wildtype and C481-mutant BTK with equal low nM potency, and has favorable oral pharmacology that enables continuous BTK inhibition throughout the dosing interval regardless of intrinsic rate of BTK turnover. In the phase 1/2 BRUIN study, pirtobrutinib demonstrated promising durable overall response rates (ORR) and was well tolerated in patients with pre-treated CLL/SLL regardless of prior therapy (including cBTKi), number of prior lines of therapy, BTK C481 mutation status, or reason for prior cBTKi discontinuation. The study's objective is to assess the superiority of adding time-limited pirtobrutinib to the MURANO regimen, hypothesized to prolong disease control in a largely BTKi-pretreated population. Methods: BRUIN CLL-322 (NCT04965493) is a randomized, open-label, global, phase 3 study comparing time-limited pirtobrutinib (200mg QD) plus venetoclax and rituximab versus venetoclax and rituximab in previously treated CLL/SLL patients. Approximately 600 patients, 80% who have been previously treated with cBTKi, will be randomized 1:1 and stratified by del(17p) status (yes/no) and prior BTKi experience (discontinuation due to progressive disease vs due to other reasons vs no prior BTKi exposure). Eligible patients are adults diagnosed with CLL/SLL and require therapy per iwCLL 2018 criteria who have received prior therapy that may or may not include a cBTKi. There are no restrictions on the number of lines of prior therapy. Key exclusion criteria include CNS involvement by CLL/SLL, Richter transformation at any time, prior BCL2 inhibitor or non-covalent BTK inhibitor, or a history of either allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplant, or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy within 60 days prior to randomization. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) per iwCLL criteria assessed by an independent review committee. Secondary endpoints include investigator assessed PFS, ORR, overall survival, time to next treatment, event-free survival, safety and tolerability, and patient-reported outcomes. Enrollment is ongoing for patients previously treated with BTKi and completed for BTKi naïve patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04965493 .

7514 Background: Pirtobrutinib is a highly selective, non-covalent (reversible) BTKi. Here, we report updated results of pirtobrutinib in patients (pts) with cBTKi pre-treated relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL and more than 3 years follow-up from start of enrollment. Methods: Pts with cBTKi pre-treated R/R MCL received pirtobrutinib monotherapy in a multicenter phase 1/2 BRUIN trial (NCT03740529). Efficacy was assessed in the prespecified primary efficacy cohort that comprised the first 90 enrolled pts who had measurable disease, had received a prior cBTKi, and had no known central nervous system involvement. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) as assessed by independent review committee. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR) and safety. A data cut of 29 July 2022 was utilized. Results: Among MCL pts who received a prior cBTKi (n=90), median age was 70 years (range, 46-87), median prior lines of therapy were 3 (range, 1-8), 82% discontinued a prior cBTKi due to disease progression, and 78% had intermediate/high risk sMIPI score. Of samples available, 17/36 (47%) had TP53 mutations and 25/34 (74%) had Ki67 ≥30%. The ORR was 57% (95% CI, 46-67), including 19% complete responses (n=17) and 38% partial responses (n=34). At a median follow-up time of 13 months, the median DOR among the 51 responding pts was 17.6 months (95% CI, 7.3-27.2). The 12- and 18-month estimated DOR rates were 58% (95% CI, 41-72) and 45% (95% CI, 27-61), respectively. ORR and DOR by subgroups are shown in the Table. The median progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.3–13.3). The median overall survival was 23.5 months (95% CI, 15.9-NE). In the MCL safety cohort (n=166), the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were fatigue (31%), diarrhea (22%), and anemia (17%). The most common Grade ≥3 TEAE was neutropenia (15%). Grade ≥3 TEAE of hemorrhage (3%) and atrial fibrillation/flutter (2%) were infrequent. Only 5 (3%) pts discontinued due to a treatment-related AE. Conclusions: Pirtobrutinib continues to show durable efficacy and a favorable safety profile in heavily pre-treated R/R MCL pts with prior cBTKi therapy. Responses were observed in pts with high-risk disease features including pts with blastoid/pleomorphic variants, elevated Ki67 index, and TP53 mutations. Clinical trial information: NCT03740529 . [Table: see text]

PURPOSE Pirtobrutinib is a highly selective, noncovalent (reversible) Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi). We report the safety and efficacy of pirtobrutinib in patients with covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) pretreated mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL), a population with poor prognosis. METHODS Patients with cBTKi pretreated relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL received pirtobrutinib monotherapy in a multicenter phase I/II trial (BRUIN; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03740529 ). Efficacy was assessed in the first 90 consecutively enrolled patients who met criteria for inclusion in the primary efficacy cohort. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points included duration of response (DOR) and safety. RESULTS The median patient age was 70 years (range, 46-87), the median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range, 1-8), 82.2% had discontinued a prior cBTKi because of disease progression, and 77.8% had intermediate- or high-risk simplified MCL International Prognostic Index score. The ORR was 57.8% (95% CI, 46.9 to 68.1), including 20.0% complete responses (n = 18). At a median follow-up of 12 months, the median DOR was 21.6 months (95% CI, 7.5 to not reached). The 6- and 12-month estimated DOR rates were 73.6% and 57.1%, respectively. In the MCL safety cohort (n = 164), the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatigue (29.9%), diarrhea (21.3%), and dyspnea (16.5%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs of hemorrhage (3.7%) and atrial fibrillation/flutter (1.2%) were less common. Only 3% of patients discontinued pirtobrutinib because of a treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSION Pirtobrutinib is a first-in-class novel noncovalent (reversible) BTKi and the first BTKi of any kind to demonstrate durable efficacy after prior cBTKi therapy in heavily pretreated R/R MCL. Pirtobrutinib was well tolerated with low rates of treatment discontinuation because of toxicity.

PURPOSE The International Prognostic Score (IPS) has been used in classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) for 25 years. However, analyses have documented suboptimal performance of the IPS among contemporarily treated patients. Harnessing multisource individual patient data from the Hodgkin Lymphoma International Study for Individual Care consortium, we developed and validated a modern clinical prediction model. METHODS Model development via Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis guidelines was performed on 4,022 patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage adult cHL from eight international phase III clinical trials, conducted from 1996 to 2014. External validation was performed on 1,431 contemporaneously treated patients from four real-world cHL registries. To consider association over a full range of continuous variables, we evaluated piecewise linear splines for potential nonlinear relationships. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS The median age in the development cohort was 33 (18-65) years; nodular sclerosis was the most common histology. Kaplan-Meier estimators were 0.77 for 5-year PFS and 0.92 for 5-year OS. Significant predictor variables included age, sex, stage, bulk, absolute lymphocyte count, hemoglobin, and albumin, with slight variation for PFS versus OS. Moreover, age and absolute lymphocyte count yielded nonlinear relationships with outcomes. Optimism-corrected c-statistics in the development model for 5-year PFS and OS were 0.590 and 0.720, respectively. There was good discrimination and calibration in external validation and consistent performance in internal-external validation. Compared with the IPS, there was superior discrimination for OS and enhanced calibration for PFS and OS. CONCLUSION We rigorously developed and externally validated a clinical prediction model in > 5,000 patients with advanced-stage cHL. Furthermore, we identified several novel nonlinear relationships and improved the prediction of patient outcomes. An online calculator was created for individualized point-of-care use.

Abstract With the introduction of large-scale molecular profiling methods and high-throughput sequencing technologies, the genomic features of most lymphoid neoplasms have been characterized at an unprecedented scale. Although the principles for the classification and diagnosis of these disorders, founded on a multidimensional definition of disease entities, have been consolidated over the past 25 years, novel genomic data have markedly enhanced our understanding of lymphomagenesis and enriched the description of disease entities at the molecular level. Yet, the current diagnosis of lymphoid tumors is largely based on morphological assessment and immunophenotyping, with only few entities being defined by genomic criteria. This paper, which accompanies the International Consensus Classification of mature lymphoid neoplasms, will address how established assays and newly developed technologies for molecular testing already complement clinical diagnoses and provide a novel lens on disease classification. More specifically, their contributions to diagnosis refinement, risk stratification, and therapy prediction will be considered for the main categories of lymphoid neoplasms. The potential of whole-genome sequencing, circulating tumor DNA analyses, single-cell analyses, and epigenetic profiling will be discussed because these will likely become important future tools for implementing precision medicine approaches in clinical decision making for patients with lymphoid malignancies.