Cascione, Luciano

ABSTRACT The characteristics at diagnosis and clinical course of primary extranodal follicular lymphoma (EFL) have not been extensively described. The International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group (IELSG) conducted an international retrospective survey aimed to describe the clinical features at diagnosis and the outcomes of FL cases with a clinically dominant extranodal component. The dataset included 605 pathologically reviewed cases from 19 different countries, and their outcomes were compared to those of nodal follicular lymphomas. The two most common presentation sites for EFL were the skin ( n = 334) and the gastrointestinal tract ( n = 72), with 22 cases having primary duodenal localization. These subsets exhibited unique features at diagnosis and significantly different overall survival (OS) patterns. After a median follow‐up of 5.5 years, primary cutaneous lymphomas showed a superior outcome [10‐year OS: 89% (95% CI, 83%–93%)], while primary gastrointestinal lymphomas had an intermediate outcome [10‐year OS: 79% (95% CI, 59%–90%)]. Among the gastrointestinal lymphomas, primary duodenal lymphomas tended toward the best outcome [10‐year OS: 95% (95% CI, 69%–99%)]. Other primary extranodal sites had inferior outcomes [10‐year OS: 59% (95% CI, 48%–68%)], similar to primary nodal lymphomas [10‐year OS: 57% (95% CI, 49%–64%)]. These findings support the identification of specific primary FL localizations as distinct entities with particular clinical and biological characteristics.

ABSTRACT The PIM family of serine/threonine kinases (PIM1, PIM2, and PIM3) are involved in the development of cancer and represent promising therapeutic targets. We investigated the therapeutic potential of targeting PIM kinases in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL), particularly the activated B‐cell‐like (ABC) subtype, using the pan‐PIM inhibitor AZD1208. We demonstrated that PIM1 and PIM2 are more highly expressed in ABC‐ cells than in germinal center B‐cell‐like (GCB) ‐DLBCL cells, and that ABC‐DLBCL cell lines are more sensitive to PIM inhibition with AZD1208. Transcriptome analysis of ABC‐DLBCL cell lines treated with AZD1208 revealed a downregulation of genes involved in NF‐κB signaling, a crucial pathway for ABC‐DLBCL. We also explored synergistic drug combinations using a high‐throughput screen, which identified BCL2 and glutaminase inhibitors as effective partners for AZD1208, particularly in aggressive ABC‐DLBCL and double‐hit cell lines. The combination of AZD1208 with the clinically available BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax was synergistic in most DLBCL cell lines, and this combination induced apoptosis and reduced levels of AKT and MCL1 proteins. In conclusion, our findings suggested that AZD1208, especially when combined with BCL2 inhibitors like venetoclax, holds promise as a treatment strategy for aggressive lymphomas. These combinations may enable lower doses of PIM inhibitors, leading to increased tolerability and improved anti‐tumor activity in clinical settings. The study also highlighted the potential for targeting PIM kinases in combination with other therapies to overcome drug resistance in DLBCL.

AbstractExtranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) is a heterogeneous disease with a subset of patients exhibiting a more aggressive course. We previously reported that EMZL with multiple mucosal sites (MMS) at diagnosis is characterized by shorter survival. To better recognize patients with different patterns of progression‐free survival (PFS) we developed and validated a new prognostic index primarily based on patient's disease characteristics. We derived the “Revised mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue International Prognostic Index” (Revised MALT‐IPI) in a large data set (n = 397) by identifying candidate variables that showed highest prognostic association with PFS. The revised MALT‐IPI was validated in two independent cohorts, from the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic (n = 297) and from IELSG‐19 study (n = 400). A stepwise Cox regression analysis yielded a model including four independent predictors of shorter PFS. Revised MALT‐IPI has scores ranging from 0 to 5, calculated as a sum of one point for each of the following‐ age >60 years, elevated LDH, and stage III–IV; and two points for MMS. In the training cohort, the Revised MALT‐IPI defined four risk groups: low risk (score 0, reference group), low‐medium risk (score 1, HR = 1.85, p = .008), medium‐high risk (score 2, HR = 3.84, p < .0001), and high risk (score 3+, HR = 8.48, p < .0001). Performance of the Revised MALT‐IPI was similar in external validation cohorts. Revised MALT‐IPI is a new index centered on disease characteristics that provides robust risk‐stratification identifying a group of patients characterized by earlier progression of disease. Revised MALT‐IPI can allow a more disease‐adjusted management of patients with EMZL in clinical trials and practice.

INTRODUCTION: EMZL is a heterogeneous disease with variable risk for relapse and progression. Based on age ≥70 years, stage III-IV and elevated LDH, Thieblemont et al (Blood. 2017) developed the MALT-IPI to identify high-risk patients. In this index, disease characteristics (stage and LDH) account for 66% while a disease nonspecific characteristic (age) for 33% of the index score. We reported (Am J Hematol. 2019) that EMZL with multiple mucosal sites (MMS) at diagnosis is characterized by shorter survival and increased incidence of higher grade transformation. To better recognize disease-attributable high-risk patients, we developed a new EMZL prognosis score chiefly based on patient's disease characteristics. METHODS: The revised (R)-MALT-IPI was developed using a retrospective data set of 405 EMZL patients treated at the University of Miami (UM) from 1995 to 2017. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of the potential prognostic variables on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and to develop the new index R-MALTI-IPI based on PFS. Model validation was performed in two independent cohorts of EMZL patients from the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) database (n=297) and the IELSG-19 study (n=400) used for the development of MALT-IPI. Performance of various prognostic indices was compared using AIC statistics, and concordance c-statistics by Harrell (CH) and by Gonen and Heller (CGH). RESULTS: Among the candidate variables tested in univariable analysis, the following were statistically significant predictors of shorter PFS: age >60, age ≥70, anemia (Hb<12g/dL), stage III-IV, ECOG PS ≥2, elevated serum LDH, number of extranodal sites >1, number of nodal sites >4, and presence of MMS at diagnosis, defined as EMZL with ≥2 different extranodal sites excluding spleen and bone marrow. A stepwise Cox regression analysis yielded a multivariable model with four independent predictors of shorter PFS: age >60 (HR=1.53, p=0.010), elevated LDH (HR=1.73, p=0.004), stage III-IV (HR=2.03, p=0.0003) and presence of MMS (HR=2.78, p<0.0001). Based on this, a new index R-MALT-IPI was developed with scores ranging from 0 to 5, calculated as a sum of 1 point for age >60, elevated LDH, stage III-IV, and 2 points for MMS. The R-MALT-IPI defined 4 risk groups: low-risk (score 0 (35%), reference group), low-medium risk (score 1 (39%), HR=1.91, p=0.005), medium-high risk (score 2 (13%), HR=3.77, p<0.0001), and high-risk (score 3+ (13%), HR=8.54, p<0.0001). When compared with MALT-IPI, R-MALT-IPI better stratifies and separates high risk patients (26%) into medium-high risk and high-risk patients with a median PFS of 5.8 years (2.9-9.1) and 1.8 years (1.3-2.6) respectively, compared to 2.6 years (1.8-4.7) in the high-risk MALT-IPI patients (16.8%). The R-MALT-IPI index also distinguished patients with different OS. For validation, we analyzed R-MALT-IPI index performance in independent Iowa/Mayo Clinic MER and IELSG-19 cohorts. Both R-MALT-IPI and MALT-IPI were useful in distinguishing PFS and OS in all the cohorts. In the UM training cohort, the concordance c-statistics' values for the two indices were similar: for PFS, CH=0.6893 and CGH=0.6611 for R-MALT-IPI, and CH=0.6551 and CGH=0.6367 for MALT-IPI; for OS, CH=0.7017 and CGH=0.6813 for R-MALT-IPI, and CH=0.7029 and CGH=0.67715 for MALT-IPI. In the validation cohorts, the concordance c-statistics' values for the two indices were also similar, but slightly lower than in the UM cohort for PFS. When comparing medium-high to high-risk R-MALT-IPI groups, there was a reduction of 4 years in median PFS in the UM cohort, and reduction in median EFS of 5.6 years in the MER cohort, an important difference between these risk groups identified by the R-MALT-IPI index. CONCLUSIONS: R-MALT-IPI is a new index for EMZL centered principally on disease characteristics. Overall, there is a similar prediction of PFS (EFS) by R-MALT-IPI and MALT-IPI indexes; however, R-MALT-IPI better recognizes a high-risk group accounting for 13% of EMZL patients with short median PFS and thus obviates the waiting period needed to recognize patients with shorter EFS24. Collaborative studies addressing best treatment approach for these high-risk EMZL patients are eagerly needed. Disclosures Alderuccio: Agios: Other: Immediate family member; Foundation Medicine: Other: Immediate family member; OncLive: Consultancy; Targeted Oncology: Honoraria; Puma Biotechnology: Other: Immediate family member; Inovio Pharmaceuticals: Other: Immediate family member. Thieblemont:Cellectis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyte: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Cerhan:Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NanoString: Research Funding. Zucca:Kite, A Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant, Research Funding; AstraZenaca: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celltrion Helathcare: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Other: Travel Grant. Lossos:NIH: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Scientific: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.