Back to Authors

Wyngaerde, Kelly Van De

Mayo Clinic

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Citations 1

The Component Structure of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI): A Reappraisal
Wyngaerde, Kelly M. Van De, Lee, Minji K. , Jacobson, Gary P. , McCaslin, Devin L. , Wyngaerde, Kelly Van De, Pasupathy, Kalyan S. , Romero‐Brufau, Santiago

Otology & Neurotology | August 30, 2019 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1217-1223

10.1097/mao.0000000000002365 Get It

Objective.: The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) is a 25-item self-report questionnaire developed to measure the disabling and handicapping impact of dizziness. The present investigation was conducted in an effort to re-assess the factor structure of the DHI. Study Design.: Retrospective study. Setting.: Tertiary care center. Patients.: Subjects were 1,991 patients who were evaluated in the Mayo Clinic-Rochester Vestibular and Balance Laboratory. Main Outcome Measures.: Exploratory factor analysis: an exploratory bifactor analysis (EFA) with bifactor rotation was used to analyze a random sample of 999 patients. Analyses were used to determine the dominance of the general factor (i.e., total score) relative to the group factor (i.e., subscales). Confirmatory factor analysis: a confirmatory bifactor graded response model was fit with appropriate item-to-group relationships that was discovered by our exploratory analyses. To validate the bifactor model that was identified with the exploratory analyses, a bifactor model with three grouping factors (i.e., Physical manifestations, Catastrophic impact of dizziness, and the Emotional impact of dizziness) were fit to a different random sample of 992 patients using the new item-to-group factor specifications. Results.: In the confirmatory analyses, all items had a positive factor loading on the general factor. There were 14 items that loaded on the general factor only. The rest of the items (n = 11) loaded on both the general factor and one of three group factors. Conclusions.: Conclusions of the study revealed several findings: 1) reporting the result as a total score (i.e., a single general factor) is warranted, and, 2) there is statistical support for the existence of three subscales representing: the Physical manifestations, Catastrophic impact, and Emotional impact of dizziness and vertigo.