Effect of Disease Activity, Glucocorticoid Exposure, and Rituximab on Body Composition During Induction Treatment of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis
ObjectiveWe investigated the relationships between glucocorticoid use, disease activity, and changes in body mass index (BMI) in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV).MethodsWe analyzed AAV patients enrolled in the Rituximab in AAV trial. Glucocorticoid use, BMI, and disease activity were measured regularly during the trial period. We performed mixed‐effects regressions to examine the associations of time‐dependent cumulative average glucocorticoid use and disease activity with changes in BMI over time, while adjusting for potential confounders.ResultsThe mean ± SD baseline BMI of the 197 patients enrolled was 28.8 ± 6.3 kg/m2. Patients with newly diagnosed AAV tended to have a lower mean ± SD BMI than those with relapsing disease (28.0 ± 5.7 kg/m2 versus 29.6 ± 6.8 kg/m2) and higher disease activity (mean ± SD Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis 8.7 ± 3.3 versus 7.4 ± 2.7). The most significant change in BMI occurred during the first 6 months of the trial (mean ± SD increase of 1.1 ± 2.2 kg/m2; P < 0.0001). Disease activity improvement, glucocorticoid exposure, and randomization to rituximab were each independently associated with an increase in BMI (P < 0.001 for all analyses).ConclusionOur findings suggest that changes in BMI, as well as glucocorticoid exposure, are independently associated with improvements in disease activity in AAV. Rituximab may also have effects on BMI independent of its impact on disease activity.
Myeloperoxidase–Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody (ANCA)–Positive and ANCA‐Negative Patients With Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Wegener's): Distinct Patient Subsets
ObjectiveTo examine the relationship of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) type and ANCA‐associated vasculitis (AAV) diagnosis with demographic features, disease manifestations, and clinical outcomes. We focused on patients who account for the differences between ANCA type and disease type classifications: anti‐myeloperoxidase (MPO)–ANCA–positive and ANCA‐negative patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's) (GPA).MethodsWe performed a pooled analysis of the Wegener's Granulomatosis Etanercept Trial and the Rituximab in ANCA‐Associated Vasculitis trial comparing patients with MPO‐ANCA–positive GPA and patients with ANCA‐negative GPA to patients with proteinase 3 (PR3)–ANCA–positive GPA and patients with MPO‐ANCA–positive microscopic polyangiitis (MPA).ResultsOf the 365 patients analyzed, 273 (75%) had PR3‐ANCA–positive GPA, 33 (9%) had MPO‐ANCA–positive GPA, 15 (4%) had ANCA‐negative GPA, and 44 (12%) had MPO‐ANCA–positive MPA. MPO‐ANCA–positive GPA patients were younger at diagnosis compared to MPO‐ANCA–positive MPA patients (53 versus 61 years; P = 0.02). Their disease manifestations and rates of relapse were similar to those of PR3‐ANCA–positive GPA patients. Relapse was more frequent in MPO‐ANCA–positive GPA patients than in patients with MPO‐ANCA–positive MPA at trial entry as well as at 12 and 18 months. ANCA‐negative patients with GPA had lower Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis scores at trial entry than PR3‐ANCA–positive patients with GPA (4.5 versus 7.7; P < 0.01), primarily because of a lower prevalence of renal involvement.ConclusionWe were unable to demonstrate important clinical differences between MPO‐ANCA–positive and PR3‐ANCA–positive patients with GPA. The risk of relapse was associated more closely with disease type than with ANCA type in this patient cohort. These findings deserve consideration in the assessment of relapse risk in patients with AAV.
Outcomes of Nonsevere Relapses in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis Treated With Glucocorticoids
ObjectiveNonsevere relapses are more common than severe relapses in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV), but their clinical course and treatment outcomes remain largely unexamined. We undertook this study to analyze the outcomes of patients with nonsevere relapses in the Rituximab in ANCA‐Associated Vasculitis (RAVE) trial who were treated with prednisone according to a prespecified protocol.MethodsRAVE was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial comparing rituximab (RTX) to cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA) for induction of remission. Patients who experienced nonsevere relapses between months 1 and 18 were treated with a prednisone increase without a concomitant change in their nonglucocorticoid immunosuppressants, followed by a taper.ResultsForty‐four patients with a first nonsevere relapse were analyzed. In comparison to the 71 patients who maintained relapse‐free remission over 18 months, these patients were more likely to have proteinase 3–ANCAs, diagnoses of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's), and a history of relapsing disease at baseline. A prednisone increase led to remission in 35 patients (80%). However, only 13 patients (30%) were able to maintain second remissions through the followup period (mean 12.5 months); 31 patients (70%) had a second disease relapse, 14 of them with severe disease. The mean time to second relapse was 9.4 months (4.7 months in the group treated with RTX versus 13.7 months in the group treated with CYC/AZA; P < 0.01). Patients who experienced nonsevere relapses received more glucocorticoids than those who maintained remission (6.7 grams versus 3.8 grams; P < 0.01).ConclusionTreatment of nonsevere relapses in AAV with an increase in glucocorticoids is effective in restoring temporary remission in the majority of patients, but recurrent relapses within a relatively short interval remain common. Alternative treatment approaches are needed for this important subset of patients.
Peripheral CD5+ B Cells in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis
ObjectiveCD5+ B cells have been conceptualized as a possible surrogate for Breg cells. The aim of the present study was to determine the utility of CD5+ B cells as biomarkers in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV).MethodsThe absolute and relative numbers (percentages) of CD5+ B cells (explanatory variables) were measured longitudinally during 18 months in 197 patients randomized to receive either rituximab (RTX) or cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA) for the treatment of AAV (Rituximab in ANCA‐Associated Vasculitis [RAVE] trial). Outcome variables included disease activity (status of active disease versus complete remission), responsiveness to induction therapy, disease relapse, disease severity, and, in RTX‐treated patients, relapse‐free survival according to the percentage of CD5+ B cells detected upon B cell repopulation.ResultsCD5+ B cell numbers were comparable between the treatment groups at baseline. After an initial decline, absolute CD5+ B cell numbers progressively increased in patients in the RTX treatment arm, but remained low in CYC/AZA‐treated patients. In both groups, the percentage of CD5+ B cells increased during remission induction and slowly declined thereafter. During relapse, the percentage of CD5+ B cells correlated inversely with disease activity in RTX‐treated patients, but not in patients who received CYC/AZA. No significant association was observed between the numbers of CD5+ B cells and induction treatment failure or disease severity. The dynamics of the CD5+ B cell compartment did not anticipate disease relapse. Following B cell repopulation, the percentage of CD5+ B cells was not predictive of time to flare in RTX‐treated patients.ConclusionThe percentage of peripheral CD5+ B cells might reflect disease activity in RTX‐treated patients. However, sole staining for CD5 as a putative surrogate marker for Breg cells did not identify a subpopulation of B cells with clear potential for meaningful clinical use. Adequate phenotyping of Breg cells is required to further explore the value of these cells as biomarkers in AAV.
Rituximab for the Treatment of Relapses in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis
ObjectiveDisease relapses are frequent in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV). This study was undertaken to evaluate outcomes in patients with AAV who are re‐treated with rituximab (RTX) and prednisone for severe disease relapses.MethodsThe Rituximab in AAV trial was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial comparing the rates of remission induction among patients treated with RTX (n = 99) and patients treated with cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA) (n = 98). Prednisone was tapered to discontinuation after 5.5 months. After remission was achieved, patients who experienced a severe disease relapse between months 6 and 18 were eligible to receive RTX and prednisone on an open‐label basis according to a prespecified protocol. Investigators remained blinded with regard to the original treatment assignment.ResultsTwenty‐six patients received RTX for disease relapse after remission had initially been achieved with their originally assigned treatment. Fifteen of these patients were initially randomized to receive RTX and 11 to receive CYC/AZA. Thirteen (87%) of the patients originally assigned to receive RTX and 10 (91%) originally assigned to receive CYC/AZA achieved remission again with open‐label RTX (an overall percentage of 88%). In half of the patients treated with open‐label RTX, prednisone could be discontinued entirely. Patients in this cohort experienced fewer adverse events compared to the overall study population (4.7 adverse events per patient‐year versus 11.8 adverse events per patient‐year).ConclusionRe‐treatment of AAV relapses with RTX and glucocorticoids appears to be a safe and effective strategy, regardless of previous treatment.
Clinical Outcomes of Remission Induction Therapy for Severe Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis
ObjectiveTo evaluate the reasons that complete remission is not achieved or maintained with original treatment in some patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV) treated with rituximab (RTX) or with cyclophosphamide/azathioprine (CYC/AZA).MethodsThe Rituximab in AAV trial was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial comparing the rate of remission induction among patients treated with RTX (n = 99) and patients treated with CYC followed by AZA (n = 98). Glucocorticoids were tapered over a period of 5 months. The primary outcome measure was lack of disease activity without glucocorticoid treatment at 6 months. To determine the most important reason for failure to achieve the primary outcome, 7 hierarchical categories of reasons were defined retrospectively (uncontrolled disease, adverse event leading to therapy discontinuation, severe flare, limited flare, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis >0, prednisone treatment at any dosage, and other).ResultsAlthough remission (lack of disease activity) was achieved in 170 of the 197 patients (86%) in the first 6 months, the primary outcome measure was not achieved in 42%. There were 3 deaths. Twenty‐four percent of the patients failed to achieve the primary end point due to active disease: 10 (5%) experienced uncontrolled disease in the first month and 37 (19%) experienced flares after initial improvement. In the majority of such patients, treatment with blinded crossover or according to best medical judgment led to disease control. Ninety‐one percent of patients who had uncontrolled disease or experienced a severe flare had proteinase 3 (PR3)–ANCA. When patients with uncontrolled disease were excluded from analysis, those who were PR3‐ANCA positive were found to experience fewer flares when treated with RTX compared to CYC/AZA (8 of 59 [14%] versus 20 of 62 [32%]; P = 0.02). Neither ANCA titers nor B cell counts predicted disease flare.ConclusionCurrent treatment regimens are largely successful in controlling AAV, but in approximately one‐fourth of patients, active disease persists or recurs in the first 6 months despite treatment. PR3‐ANCA positivity is a risk factor for recurrence or persistence of severe disease. ANCA titers and B cell detectability are poor predictors of both disease relapse and disease quiescence in the first 6 months.