Back to Authors

Fang, Xiangming

0000-0001-9922-8977

Mayo Clinic

East Carolina University

Citations 2

How Do Nasopharyngoscopy Ratings of Sustained Speech Differ From Connected Speech?
Snodgrass, Taylor D. , Chee-Williams, Jessica L. , Sitzman, Thomas J. , Perry, Jamie L. , Perry, Jamie L , Sitzman, Thomas J , Chee-Williams, Jessica L , Snodgrass, Taylor , Fang, Xiangming

The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal | November 25, 2025 | Volume: 63 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 463-471

10.1177/10556656251399782 Get It

Objective To assess the relationship in ratings of velopharyngeal closure between connected speech and sustained speech, as visualized on nasopharyngoscopy. Design Prospective observational study. Setting Craniofacial clinics in the United States and Canada. Participants Fifty-two participants with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) who underwent nasopharyngoscopy and produced both connected speech and sustained speech of either /i/or /s/ during the procedure. Main outcome measure(s) Correlations and differences between connected speech and sustained speech for velopharyngeal closure percentage, velar movement, lateral pharyngeal wall movement, and velopharyngeal closure pattern. Results There were moderate to very strong correlations observed between connected speech and sustained /i/ for velopharyngeal closure percentage ( P < .01); extent of velar movement ( P < .01), and left ( P < .01) and right ( P < .01) lateral pharyngeal wall movement. Findings were similar between connected speech and sustained /s/. Differences between ratings made during connected and sustained speech were small: for velopharyngeal closure percentage, there was a 5% difference in the mean between connected speech and sustained /i/ (77.5% vs 72.5%) and a 7% difference for /s/ (79.3% vs 86.7%). Overall differences across ratings ranged from 2% to 12%. Closure pattern was rated the same for both connected speech and sustained /i/ in 90% of videos (n = 44/49; P = .38) and the same for connected speech and sustained /s/ in 95% of videos (n = 42/44; P = 1.00). Conclusions Ratings of velopharyngeal movement during nasopharyngoscopy are similar between connected speech and sustained /i/ and /s/ suggesting elicitation of only sustained /i/ and /s/ may be adequate in most cases when assessment of connected speech is not possible.
Morphology of the Musculus Uvulae In Vivo Using MRI and 3D Modeling Among Adults With Normal Anatomy and Preliminary Comparisons to Cleft Palate Anatomy
Chen, Joshua Y., Kotlarek, Katelyn J. , Haenssler, Abigail E. , Sutton, Bradley P. , Kuehn, David P., Sitzman, Thomas J. , Perry, Jamie L. , Fang, Xiangming

The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal | February 20, 2019 | Volume: 56 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 993-1000

10.1177/1055665619828226 Get It

Purpose: To investigate the musculus uvulae morphology in vivo in adults with normal velopharyngeal anatomy and to examine sex and race effects on the muscle morphology. We also sought to provide a preliminary comparison of musculus uvulae morphology in adults with normal velopharyngeal anatomy to adults with repaired cleft palate. Methods: Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging data and Amira 5.5 Visualization Modeling software were used to evaluate the musculus uvulae in 70 participants without cleft palate and 6 participants with cleft palate. Muscle length, thickness, width, and volume were compared among participant groups. Results: Analysis of covariance analysis did not yield statistically significant differences in musculus uvulae length, thickness, width, or volume by race or sex among participants without cleft palate when the effect of body size was accounted for. Two-sample t test revealed that the musculus uvulae in participants with repaired cleft palate is significantly shorter ( P = .008, 13.65 mm vs 16.07 mm) and has less volume ( P = .002, 51.08 mm 3 vs 97.62 mm 3 ) than participants without cleft palate. Conclusion: In adults with normal velopharyngeal anatomy, the musculus uvulae is a cylindrical oblong-shaped muscle lying on the nasal surface of the soft palate, with its greatest bulk located just nasal to the levator veli palatini muscle sling. In participants with repaired cleft palate, the musculus uvulae is substantially reduced in volume. This diminished muscle bulk located just at the point where the palate contacts the posterior pharyngeal wall may contribute to velopharyngeal insufficiency in children with repaired cleft palate.