Byrnes, Kathleen

Malakoplakia is an inflammatory process related to defective macrophage response to bacterial infection. To further characterize the clinicopathologic manifestations of gastrointestinal malakoplakia, 26 cases were identified from 6 institutions. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and available stains were reviewed, and pertinent clinicopathologic features analyzed. Sixteen patients were women (62%). Mean patient age was 64 (range: 24 to 83). Sites included the colorectum (n=23), appendix (n=1), and stomach (n=2). Clinical indications for tissue procurement included screening (n=14), tumor resection (n=5), diarrhea (n=1), adenoma surveillance (n=1), ulcerative colitis flare (n=1), abdominal pain (n=1), and appendicitis (1). All cases featured histiocytes with abundant, pale, eosinophilic cytoplasm focally containing Michaelis-Gutmann bodies. The process frequently involved the mucosa (n=19), with architectural distortion in 13 cases. Lymphoid aggregates were present in 18 cases, which were prominent or obscuring in 11 (all colon biopsies) and provoked concern for lymphoma in 2. Associated findings included adenocarcinoma (n=5), adenoma (n=2), gastric hyperplastic polyps (n=1), chemical gastritis (n=1), collagenous colitis (n=1), and active chronic colitis (n=2). In cases with available stains, Michaelis-Gutman bodies were highlighted by Periodic Acid-Schiff with diastase, Von Kossa, and iron stains. Although 2 cases were positive for Tropheryma whipplei antibody, no T. whipplei transcripts were detected on real-time polymerase chain reaction. All patients with available follow-up are alive and well with no additional instances of malakoplakia. Malakoplakia of the gastrointestinal tract is a benign, incidental finding. Although histologic features in the stomach and colon resections are similar to those at other sites, exuberant lymphocytic response in colon biopsies and immunoreactivity with T. whippleii antibody may provoke initial confusion and lead to unnecessary time and resource investment.

AimsInverted appendices are rare, but have the potential to cause diagnostic confusion among endoscopists and pathologists. The aim of this study was to describe the clinicopathological features of inverted appendices seen at our institution over the last 30 years.Methods and resultsTwenty‐one inverted appendices were identified and the clinical and pathological features reviewed. Patients were predominantly middle‐aged women. Most cases were detected incidentally on colonoscopy. Endoscopically, inverted appendices appeared polypoid in the proximal caecum. All resections featured associated pathological processes, including endometriosis (n = 3), inflammatory mucocoele (n = 1), low‐grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (n = 2), traditional serrated adenoma (n = 1) and inflammatory fibroid polyp (n = 1). Five cases were endoscopically mischaracterised as caecal polyps and removed via polypectomy; initial pathological impressions were erroneous in most cases. All polypectomies featured a dome‐like configuration covered by mucosa on the convex surface; the majority had aggregates of ganglion cells and neural plexi embedded in muscularis propria. The vast majority of cases, regardless of the procedure, showed lymphoid aggregates. Among post‐polypectomy patients with follow‐up, none experienced perforation‐associated morbidity despite the histological presence of muscularis propria.ConclusionsThe diagnosis of an inverted appendix should be considered in polypectomy specimens from the caecum or appendiceal orifice with (i) dome‐like tissue configuration covered by mucosa on the convex surface, (ii) a deep, robust smooth muscle component with ganglion cells (muscularis propria) and (iii) associated lymphoid aggregates. Prompt recognition on H&E will avoid unnecessary time and resource investment.

AimsGastric heterotopia (GH) has been described throughout the gastrointestinal tract. However, the colorectal region is an extremely rare location for it. We describe the clinicopathological features of GH of the colon, rectum and anus.Methods and resultsWe identified 33 cases in 20 males and 13 females (median age = 54 years; range = 4 months–73 years). Sites included the rectum (n = 26), anus (n = 4), ileocaecal junction (n = 1), ascending colon (n = 1) and descending colon (n = 1). Presenting symptoms (n = 27) included haematochezia (41%) and altered bowel habits (4%); 15 patients (55%) were asymptomatic. On colonoscopy (n = 31), all appeared as solitary lesions (median size = 6.5 mm, range = 2–55 mm), either as polyps (61%), raised erythematous patches (23%), an ulcer (10%), within a rectal diverticulum (3%) or a haemorrhoid (3%). Patients were managed by polypectomy. One with an associated carcinoma in the area of GH underwent resection. No morbidity related to GH itself was reported following excision. Histologically, heterotopic gastric mucosa was oxyntic (85%), mixed oxyntic and non‐oxyntic (12%) and not specified (3%) types. In five patients a pyloric gland adenoma (PGA) arose from heterotopic gastric mucosa, two of which contained a focus of invasive adenocarcinoma. One case had associated surface foveolar‐type low‐grade dysplasia. Another had associated adenocarcinoma arising from the heterotopic mucosa. One example harboured Helicobacter pylori organisms.ConclusionsWe highlight the features of GH in the distal GIT – the ‘outlet patch’. Association with PGA, surface dysplasia and adenocarcinoma suggests that lower tract GH can undergo neoplastic transformation.