Lee, Kun Hee

1514 Background: The prevalence of germline mutations in non-white patients with breast cancer and the germline genetic drivers of breast cancer risk in non-white populations are largely unknown. Methods: The study population included 77,900 women with breast cancer (Non-Hispanic white: 57,003; Black: 6,722; Asian: 4,183; Hispanic: 5,194; Ashkenazi-Jewish: 4,798) who underwent germline multigene panel testing of cancer predisposition genes from March 2012 to December 2016. The prevalence of predisposition gene mutations in racial and ethnic populations relative to non-Hispanic Whites was assessed while accounting for age at diagnosis of breast cancer, family history of breast and ovarian cancer, and estrogen receptor status of breast tumors. Associations between mutations in each gene and breast cancer risk were evaluated using reference controls. Results: The overall frequency of pathogenic mutations in known breast cancer predisposition genes was 9.1% for non-Hispanic Whites, 9.8% for African Americans, 10.2% for Hispanics, 7.6% for Ashkenazi-Jewish, and 7.5% for Asians. BRCA1 mutations were enriched (p < 0.05) and CHEK2 mutations were under-represented in all racial and ethnic populations relative to non-Hispanic Whites. BRCA2 and BARD1 mutations were enriched in African Americans and Hispanics relative to non-Hispanic Whites, whereas PALB2 and RAD51C mutations were enriched in Hispanics. Among genes with mutation counts large enough for assessment, mutations in BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and TP53 were significantly associated with clinically relevant increased risks (odds ratio (OR) > 2) of breast cancer across all ethnicities and races. Rates of variants of uncertain significance were highest among Asians (29%), followed by blacks (27%), Hispanics (21%), non-Hispanic whites (16%) and Ashkenazi-Jews (14%). Conclusions: While there is some similarity across ethnic groups, substantial heterogeneity exists in the prevalence of mutations in breast cancer predisposition genes across major racial and ethnic groups in the US population. These findings contribute to our understanding of breast cancer risk and have significant implications for genetic testing, screening, and management of patients with an inherited predisposition to breast cancer, with a need for continued analysis with increased cohort size in ethnic minority groups.

262 Background: Inherited and somatic aberrations in DNA repair genes in castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) are associated with poor prognosis, but respond well to poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. We evaluated the prevalence and prognostic impact of harboring germline DNA repair variants in hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). Methods: Germline DNA from buffy coat was sequenced on HiSeq4000 with a median coverage of 200X for DNA repair variants in 20 genes in HSPC and CRPC patients (pts) enrolled in a hospital registry. Pts were divided into two groups; Group A: pts enrolled at the time of CRPC stage; Group B: treatment naïve HSPC stage pts. The primary endpoints were to determine any impact of harboring DNA repair variants on time to progression from HSPC to CRPC and, from CRPC to death. Group A pts were retrospectively analyzed for time to progression from HSPC to CRPC while Group B patients were followed prospectively for outcomes. Statistical analysis included Cox proportional hazard models and Wilcoxon Rank sum test with significance at p≤0.05. Results: In Group A, 51/562 CRPC pts (9.07%) had variants in the 20 genes (most frequently in BRCA2; n = 15). 44/51 pts with variants and 399/511 without variants had died. Median time of progression from HSPC to CRPC with/without variants was 22.1 vs. 25.1 months (mths); p-value = 0.679. Median time from CRPC to death with/without variants was 32.2 Vs. 27.7 mths (p = 0.6). In HSPC Group B, 14/100 pts were identified with germline variants in ATM (n = 5), CHEK2 (n = 3), BRCA1 (n = 2), BRCA2 (n = 2), RAD50 (n = 1), and MSH2 (n = 1). 31/100 have died and median time to progression from HSPC to CRPC with/without variants was 15.6 vs.11.8 mths, p-value = 0.76. Conclusions: Pts with germline DNA repair variants detected in HSPC stage were not associated with poor prognosis. Presence of additional somatic DNA repair gene aberrations in cell-free DNA, not investigated in this cohort may add to the prevalence of DNA repair gene variations in HSPC and together impact prognosis adversely so as to provide a rationale for PARP inhibitor therapy in select HSPC stage pts.