Brook, Robert D.

Abstract Hypertensive emergencies cause substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly when acute organ injury is present. Careful and effective strategies to reduce blood pressure and diminish the effects of pressure-mediated injury are essential. While the selection of specific antihypertensive medications varies little across different forms of hypertensive emergencies, the intensity of blood pressure reduction to the target pressure differs substantially. Treatment hinges on balancing the positive effects of lowering blood pressure with the potential for negative effects of organ hypoperfusion in patients with altered autoregulatory mechanisms. When patients do not have acute organ injury in addition to severe hypertension, they benefit from a conservative, outpatient approach to blood pressure management. In all cases, long term control of blood pressure is paramount to prevent recurrent hypertensive emergencies and improve overall prognosis. This review discusses the current evidence and guidelines on the evaluation and management of hypertensive emergency.

Abstract Rationale Cardiovascular disease is a common comorbidity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although β-blockers can be used safely in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, concerns remain regarding safety and efficacy interactions in patients using concomitant inhaled long-acting β-agonists. Objectives To compare the differential effects of long-acting β-agonist or inhaled corticosteroid use on clinical outcomes in patients with heightened cardiovascular risk treated and not treated with β-blockers. Methods We examined data from 16,485 participants in the SUMMIT study (Study to Understand Mortality and Morbidity in COPD) who were randomized to once-daily inhaled fluticasone furoate, vilanterol, fluticasone furoate/vilanterol combination, or placebo and examined the associations between treatment allocation and lung function, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality, stratified by baseline β-blocker therapy. Results Baseline β-blocker therapy was used by 31% (n = 5,159) of SUMMIT participants. There was no evidence of an interaction between baseline β-blocker therapy and the association between inhaled treatments and forced expiratory volume in 1 second at 3 months (P = 0.27), 6 months (P = 0.14), or 12 months (P = 0.33). The placebo-adjusted mean differences in post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second at 3 months in the vilanterol-alone group were 58 ml (95% confidence interval, 38–78) in those receiving baseline β-blocker therapy and 51 ml (95% confidence interval, 38–65) in those not receiving baseline β-blocker therapy. The placebo-adjusted mean differences in post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second at 3 months in the combination fluticasone furoate/vilanterol group were 85 ml (95% confidence interval, 65–105) in those receiving baseline β-blocker therapy and 68 ml (95% confidence interval, 54–82) in those not receiving baseline β-blocker therapy. Overall, there was no evidence of interaction by randomized treatment, including vilanterol alone or in combination with fluticasone furoate, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations (P = 0.18), cardiovascular composite events (P = 0.33), and all-cause mortality (P = 0.41). Conclusions There is no evidence to suggest that baseline β-blocker therapy reduces the respiratory benefits or increases the cardiovascular risk of inhaled long-acting β-agonists in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heightened cardiovascular risk. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01313676).