Back to Authors

Zhang, Jiajia

0000-0003-4566-0822

Mayo Clinic

University of South Carolina

Citations 2

COVID-19 Breakthrough Infections Among People With HIV: A Statewide Cohort Analysis
Yang, Xueying , Olatosi, Bankole , Zhang, Jiajia , Chen, Shujie , Liu, Ziang , Poland, Gregory A. , Weissman, Sharon , Li, Xiaoming

JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes | June 21, 2024 | Volume: 97 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 107-116

10.1097/qai.0000000000003475 Get It

Objectives: This study aims to identify COVID-19 breakthrough infections among people with HIV (PWH) across different phases of the pandemic and explore whether differential immune dysfunctions are associated with breakthrough infections. Design and methods: This retrospective population-based cohort study used data from an integrated electronic health record (EHR) database in South Carolina (SC). Breakthrough infection was defined as the first COVID-19 diagnosis documented in the state agency after the date an individual was fully vaccinated (ie, 2 doses of Pfizer/BNT162b2 or Moderna/mRNA-1273, or 1 dose of Janssen/Ad26.COV2.S) through June 14, 2022. We analyzed the risk and associated factors of the outcome using Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among 7596 fully vaccinated PWH, the overall rate of breakthrough infections was 118.95 cases per 1000 person-years. When compared with the alpha-dominant period, the breakthrough infection rate was higher during both delta-dominant (HR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.25 to 1.81) and omicron-dominant (HR: 2.86; 95% CI: 1.73 to 4.73) periods. Individuals who received a booster dose had a lower likelihood of breakthrough infections (HR: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.24). There was no association of breakthrough infections with degree of HIV viral suppression, but a higher CD4 count was significantly associated with fewer breakthroughs among PWH (>500 vs <200 cells/mm3: HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.94). Conclusions: In our PWH population, the incidence of breakthrough infections was high (during both delta-dominant and omicron-dominant periods) and mainly associated with the absence of a booster dose in patients older than 50 years, with comorbidities and low CD4 count.
Inflammatory potential of diet and risk of pancreatic cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial
Zheng, Jiali , Wirth, Michael D. , Antwi, Samuel O. , Shoaibi, Azza , Shivappa, Nitin , Antwi, Samuel O , Shivappa, Nitin , Merchant, Anwar T. , Zhang, Jiajia , Stolzenberg‐Solomon, Rachael Z. , Hébert, James R. , Steck, Susan E.

International Journal of Cancer | January 22, 2018 | Volume: 142 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 2461-2470

10.1002/ijc.31271 Get It

Inflammation plays a central role in pancreatic cancer etiology and can be modulated by diet. We aimed to examine the association between the inflammatory potential of diet, assessed with the Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII®), and pancreatic cancer risk in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial prospective cohort. Our study included 101,449 participants aged 52–78 years at baseline who completed both baseline questionnaire and a diet history questionnaire. Energy‐adjusted DII (E‐DII) scores were computed based on food and supplement intake. Cox proportional hazards models and time dependent Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with participants in the lowest E‐DII quintile (most anti‐inflammatory scores) as referent. After a median 8.5 years of follow‐up, 328 pancreatic cancer cases were identified. E‐DII scores were not associated with pancreatic cancer risk in the multivariable model (HRQ5vsQ1 = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.66–1.35; p‐trend = 0.43). Time significantly modified the association (p‐interaction = 0.01). During follow up <4 years, there was suggestive evidence of an inverse association between E‐DII and pancreatic cancer (HRQ5vsQ1 = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.35–1.02; p‐trend = 0.20) while there was a significant positive trend in the follow up ≥4 years (HRQ5vsQ1 = 1.31; 95% CI = 0.83–2.08; p‐trend = 0.03). Similar results were observed for E‐DII from food only. Our study does not support an association between inflammatory potential of diet and pancreatic cancer risk; however, heterogeneous results were obtained with different follow‐up times. These divergent associations may result from the influences of undetected disease in the short‐term.