Back to Authors

Sohn, Daewon

0000-0002-7200-9683

Mayo Clinic

Seoul National University

Citations 2

Aortic valve replacement-induced changes in native T1 are related to prognosis in severe aortic stenosis: T1 mapping cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study
Kim, Hyung‐Kwan , Park, Jun‐Bean , Park, Eun‐Ah , Lee, Seung‐Pyo , Kim, Yong-Jin , Oh, Jae K. , Kim, Hyung-Kwan , Hwang, In‐Chang , Lee, Whal , Sohn, Daewon

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging | July 13, 2019 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 653-663

10.1093/ehjci/jez201 Get It

Abstract Aims Native T1 times from T1 mapping cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) are associated with myocardial fibrosis in aortic stenosis (AS). We investigated whether changing patterns in native T1 predict clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) in severe AS patients. Methods and results Forty-three patients with severe AS (65.9 ± 8.1 years; 24 men) who underwent T1 mapping CMR at baseline and 1 year after AVR were prospectively enrolled. Upper limit of native T1 from healthy volunteers was used to define normal myocardium and diffuse fibrosis (native T1 < 1208.4 and ≥1208.4 ms, respectively). Participants were categorized into Group 1 (pre- and post-AVR normal myocardium; n = 11), Group 2 (pre-AVR diffuse fibrosis and post-AVR normal myocardium; n = 18), and Group 3 (post-AVR diffuse fibrosis; n = 14). Native T1 significantly decreased 1 year after AVR (pre-AVR, 1233.8 ± 49.7 ms; post-AVR, 1189.1 ± 58.4 ms; P < 0.001), which was associated with left ventricular (LV) mass regression (△native T1 vs. △LV mass index, r = 0.454, P = 0.010) and systolic function improvement (△native T1 vs. △LV ejection fraction, r = −0.379, P = 0.012). Group 2 showed greater functional improvements, whereas these benefits were blunted in Group 3. Group 3 had significantly worse outcomes than Group 1 [hazard ratio (HR), 9.479, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.176–76.409; P = 0.035] and Group 2 (HR 3.551, 95% CI 1.178–10.704; P = 0.024). Conclusion AVR-induced changes in native T1 values are associated with LV systolic functional changes as well as prognosis in severe AS. Post-AVR T1 mapping CMR can be used as an imaging biomarker.
Echocardiographic diagnosis of total or left congenital pericardial absence with positional change
Kim, Hyung‐Kwan , Jung, Ji-Hyun, Yoon, Yeonyee E. , Park, Jun-Bin, Lee, Seung‐Pyo , Kim, Yong‐Jin , Cho, Goo-Young, Oh, Jae K. , Park, Jun‐Bean , Kim, Min-Jeong , Yoon, Yeonyee Elizabeth , Kim, Hack‐Lyoung , Cho, Goo-Young, Sohn, Daewon , Kim, Hyung-Kwan

Heart | March 9, 2017 | Volume: 103 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 1203-1209

10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310870 Get It

Objectives Congenital absence of the pericardium (CAP) is often confused with other conditions presenting with right ventricular dilatation and usually warrants CT or cardiac MR (CMR) to confirm. It would be desirable to have more specific echocardiographic criteria to provide a conclusive diagnosis. Methods 11 patients who were diagnosed with CAP (four patients with total CAP) based on CT/CMR were consecutively enrolled. Thirteen patients with atrial septal defect (ASD) and 16 normal subjects served as controls. To investigate spatial changes of heart in the thoracic cavity in CAP, following echocardiographic measurements were made in the left and right decubitus positions: the angle between the ultrasound beam and the left ventricular posterior wall (Angle-PW) in end-diastole at the parasternal long axis, and the distance between the chest wall and the most distal part of the left ventricular posterior wall (Distance-PW) at the parasternal mid-ventricular short axis. Results Angle-PW in patients with CAP were significantly greater than in those with ASD (100.1±12.5° vs 74.5±8.6°, p<0.017) or in normal subjects (100.1±12.5° vs 69.9±7.6°, p<0.017) at the left decubitus, and the difference in Angle-PW according to posture (left vs right) was significantly greater in CAP compared with the other groups (CAP 20.7±12.7°, ASD 0.31±1.80°, normal 0.31±1.40°, all p<0.017). The differences in Distance-PW according to patient position (CAP 2.43±0.77°, ASD 0.42±0.45°, normal 0.26±0.55°) or cardiac cycle in each position (left: CAP 1.60±0.76°, ASD 0.41±0.27°, normal 0.17±0.12°; right: CAP 0.70±0.32°, ASD 0.22±0.19°, normal 0.22±0.13°) were significantly higher in the CAP group than in the other groups (all p<0.017). Conclusions Patients with CAP have dynamic alteration in cardiac position depending on posture, which is not observed in ASD or in normal controls. Hence, total or left-sided CAP can be reliably diagnosed with positional changes during routine echocardiography.