Hung, Judy W. S.

Importance Primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is a prevalent valvular lesion. Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines include class I recommendations for intervention for severe primary MR at the onset of symptoms, significant left ventricular (LV) enlargement (end-systolic dimension ≥40 mm), or dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤60%), with a class IIA recommendation for mitral valve repair when performed at an experienced surgical center. Recent data suggest a survival penalty when waiting for class I surgical guideline indications, and novel markers of decompensation are under investigation. Observations Comprehensive assessment of MR severity using echocardiography is critical, and when warranted, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is complementary. Assessment of LV size and function, as well as serial changes in both, is crucial for determining timing of surgery. New-onset atrial fibrillation, left atrial enlargement, pulmonary hypertension, and exercise-induced changes in LV function should also be considered in borderline scenarios. The roles of LV volumes, global longitudinal strain, CMR-derived measures of myocardial dysfunction, and cardiac biomarkers are worthy of further investigation regarding consideration for early surgical intervention. Conclusions and Relevance A more refined approach incorporating assessment of extravalvular cardiac injury, novel imaging markers, and biomarkers is needed to optimize surgical timing in primary MR. Further research is warranted to validate these emerging parameters and refine guidelines to improve patient outcomes.

Abstract Valvular heart disease represents a significant global health burden, with an estimated prevalence of 2.5% in high-income countries and projected increases due to population ageing. Randomized controlled trials in valvular heart disease have undergone substantial evolution, shifting from mortality-focused endpoints toward comprehensive assessments integrating imaging parameters and patient-centered outcomes. Cardiovascular imaging modalities, including echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance, have become pivotal in trial design, patient selection, and endpoint definition. Recent landmark trials in aortic stenosis, including EARLY-TAVR and EVOLVED, have challenged traditional symptom-based intervention thresholds by incorporating imaging biomarkers of subclinical myocardial dysfunction and cardiac damage staging. In aortic regurgitation, the paucity of randomized controlled trials evidence contrasts with emerging transcatheter technologies, highlighting critical knowledge gaps. Mitral regurgitation trials have demonstrated the importance of patient phenotyping, with divergent outcomes between COAPT and MITRA-FR emphasizing the role of imaging in optimal patient selection. The recent TRILUMINATE and TRISCEND trials have transformed tricuspid regurgitation management through transcatheter interventions, prioritizing quality-of-life improvements alongside traditional clinical endpoints. Future directions include standardization of imaging protocols across modalities, development of artificial intelligence-enhanced analysis, and integration of multiparametric biomarkers for personalized risk stratification. The paradigm shift toward imaging-guided, patient-centered trial design represents a fundamental reimagining of therapeutic success in valvular heart disease, moving beyond procedural outcomes toward comprehensive assessment of clinical benefit and improved patient care.

Echocardiography is the key tool for the diagnosis and evaluation of aortic stenosis. Because clinical decision-making is based on the echocardiographic assessment of its severity, it is essential that standards are adopted to maintain accuracy and consistency across echocardiographic laboratories. Detailed recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis were published by the European Association of Echocardiography and the American Society of Echocardiography in 2009. In the meantime, numerous new studies on aortic stenosis have been published with particular new insights into the difficult subgroup of low gradient aortic stenosis making an update of recommendations necessary. The document focuses in particular on the optimization of left ventricular outflow tract assessment, low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction, a new classification of aortic stenosis by gradient, flow and ejection fraction, and a grading algorithm for an integrated and stepwise approach of artic stenosis assessment in clinical practice.