Sauter, Jennifer L.

Context.— Mesothelioma is an uncommon tumor that can be difficult to diagnose. Objective.— To provide updated, practical guidelines for the pathologic diagnosis of mesothelioma. Data Sources.— Pathologists involved in the International Mesothelioma Interest Group and others with expertise in mesothelioma contributed to this update. Reference material includes peer-reviewed publications and textbooks. Conclusions.— There was consensus opinion regarding guidelines for (1) histomorphologic diagnosis of mesothelial tumors, including distinction of epithelioid, biphasic, and sarcomatoid mesothelioma; recognition of morphologic variants and patterns; and recognition of common morphologic pitfalls; (2) molecular pathogenesis of mesothelioma; (3) application of immunohistochemical markers to establish mesothelial lineage and distinguish mesothelioma from common morphologic differentials; (4) application of ancillary studies to distinguish benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations, including BAP1 and MTAP immunostains; novel immunomarkers such as Merlin and p53; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for homozygous deletion of CDKN2A; and novel molecular assays; (5) practical recommendations for routine reporting of mesothelioma, including grading epithelioid mesothelioma and other prognostic parameters; (6) diagnosis of mesothelioma in situ; (7) cytologic diagnosis of mesothelioma, including use of immunostains and molecular assays; and (8) features of nonmalignant peritoneal mesothelial lesions.

AbstractObjectivesLong-term follow-up is important for determining performance characteristics of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA).MethodsHistologic or 3 or more years of clinical follow-up was used to calculate performance characteristics of thyroid FNA before and after implementation of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). The impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) classification was also investigated.ResultsFollow-up was obtained for 1,277/1,134 and 1,616/1,393 aspirates/patients (median clinical follow-up, 9.9 and 4.4 years, pre- and post-TBSRTC, respectively). Nondiagnostic, suspicious for follicular neoplasm, and suspicious for malignancy (SFM) diagnoses decreased and benign diagnoses increased post-TBSRTC, while atypical rate remained less than 1%. Negative predictive value for benign nodules and positive predictive value (PPV) for SFM increased significantly. Eleven nodules were reclassified as NIFTP, slightly decreasing PPV/risk of malignancy (ROM).ConclusionsAppropriate ROM for thyroid FNA can be achieved through application of TBSRTC terminology with minimal use of atypical category.

We have identified 25 lesions involving alveolar lung parenchyma characterized by nodular proliferation of bland bilayered bronchiolar-type epithelium containing a continuous layer of basal cells. These lesions shared some histologic features with the recently described entity of ciliated muconodular papillary tumor (CMPT); however, the majority did not fit all diagnostic criteria in that they exhibited only focal or absent papillary architecture, and they had variable number of ciliated and mucinous cells, with some lesions entirely lacking 1 or both of these components. The morphologic and immunohistochemical features ranged from those resembling proximal bronchioles (proximal-type: moderate to abundant mucinous and ciliated cells; negative or weak TTF1 in luminal cells; n=8) to those resembling respiratory bronchioles (distal-type: scant or absent mucinous and ciliated cells; positive TTF1 in luminal cells; n=17). The hallmark of all lesions was a continuous layer of basal cells (p40 and CK5/6-positive). We provisionally designated these lesions as bronchiolar adenomas (BAs) and analyzed their clinicopathologic and molecular features. All BAs were discrete, sharply circumscribed lesions with a median size of 0.5 cm (range, 0.2 to 2.0 cm). Most lesions were either entirely flat (n=14) or contained focal papillary architecture (n=7); only 4 lesions, all proximal-type, were predominantly papillary, fitting the classic description of CMPT. Notably, of 9 lesions submitted for frozen section evaluation, 7 were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma. No postsurgical recurrences were observed for any lesions (median follow-up, 11 mo). Twenty-one BAs underwent next-generation sequencing and/or immunohistochemistry for BRAF V600E, revealing mutation profiles similar to those previously described for CMPTs, including BRAF V600E mutations (n=8, 38%), unusual EGFR exon 19 deletions (n=2, 10%), EGFR exon 20 insertions (n=2, 10%), KRAS mutations (n=5, 24%), and HRAS mutations (n=1, 5%). The mutation profiles were similar in proximal-type and distal-type lesions. In conclusion, we describe a family of putatively benign clonal proliferations with a spectrum of morphology recapitulating various levels of the bronchiolar tree, of which only a minor subset fits the classic description of CMPT. Comparable mutation profiles and partially overlapping morphologic features across the spectrum of these lesions support their nosological relationship. We propose designating this entire family of lesions as BAs, and that lesions currently designated CMPTs represent a subgroup of this family.

BACKGROUNDThe objective of the current study was to establish a process for validating immunohistochemistry (IHC) protocols for use on the Cellient cell block (CCB) system.METHODSThirty antibodies were initially tested on CCBs using IHC protocols previously validated on formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded tissue (FFPE). Cytology samples were split to generate thrombin cell blocks (TCB) and CCBs. IHC was performed in parallel. Antibody immunoreactivity was scored, and concordance or discordance in immunoreactivity between the TCBs and CCBs for each sample was determined. Criteria for validation of an antibody were defined as concordant staining in expected positive and negative cells, in at least 5 samples each, and concordance in at least 90% of the samples total. Antibodies that failed initial validation were retested after alterations in IHC conditions.RESULTSThirteen of the 30 antibodies (43%) did not meet initial validation criteria. Of those, 8 antibodies (calretinin, clusters of differentiation [CD] 3, CD20, CDX2, cytokeratin 20, estrogen receptor, MOC‐31, and p16) were optimized for CCBs and subsequently validated. Despite several alterations in conditions, 3 antibodies (Ber‐EP4, D2‐40, and paired box gene 8 [PAX8]) were not successfully validated.CONCLUSIONSNearly one‐half of the antibodies tested in the current study failed initial validation using IHC conditions that were established in the study laboratory for FFPE material. Although some antibodies subsequently met validation criteria after optimization of conditions, a few continued to demonstrate inadequate immunoreactivity. These findings emphasize the importance of validating IHC protocols for methanol‐fixed tissue before clinical use and suggest that optimization for alcohol fixation may be needed to obtain adequate immunoreactivity on CCBs. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2016;124:89‐99. © 2016 American Cancer Society.