Tougeron, David

3576 Background: BRAF encodes a serine-threonine kinase that is a downstream effector of activated RAS. A point mutation (V600E) in BRAF occurs in a subset of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and is associated with adverse outcome and may predict non response to anti-EGFR antibodies. Detection of a BRAFV600E mutation in a CRC with microsatellite instability indicates a sporadic origin and excludes Lynch Syndrome. While BRAFV600E mutation status is determined using a DNA-based assay, antibodies against the BRAFV600E protein have recently been developed. We examined mutant BRAFV600E protein expression and its concordance with mutation status. Methods: Primary stage III colon carcinomas (50 BRAFV600E mutation carriers and 25 wild-type cases) were studied from a completed phase III adjuvant trial comparing FOLFOX +/- cetuximab (NCCTG N0147). In archival resection specimens, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed using a pan-BRAF antibody and a V600E mutation-specific antibody raised against an immunogenic synthetic peptide derived from the internal region of the BRAFV600E protein. BRAFV600E mutations in codon 15 were analyzed in extracted DNA using a multiplex, allele specific PCR–based assay. BRAF staining was scored independently by two pathologists blinded to mutation status. Results: In primary colon carcinomas stained with a pan-BRAF antibody, diffuse cytoplasmic staining for BRAF proteins was detected in 74 of 75 carcinomas with one case deemed non-evaluable. Using the mutation-specific BRAFV600E antibody, diffuse cytoplasmic staining was detected in 49 of 74 tumors without appreciable heterogeneity of expression. Among these 49 tumors expressing mutant BRAFV600E proteins, all (100%) were found to carry a BRAFV600E mutation according to a DNA-based assay. In contrast, absent BRAFV600E staining was observed in all 25 tumors that were found to have wild-type copies of BRAFV600E detected using a PCR-based assay. Conclusions: For the detection of mutant BRAFV600E, complete concordance was found between IHC and a DNA-based method in colon carcinomas. This finding supports the use of IHC as a simplified strategy to screen CRCs for mutant BRAFV600E proteins in routine clinical practice to inform clinical decision-making.

492 Background: Beclin 1 interacts with its cofactor UVRAG to promote autophagy, a cellular degradation process induced by cellular stress. While cells with defective autophagy are prone to genomic instability, it is unknown whether Beclin 1 and/or UVRAG can regulate DNA damage/repair. Methods: Colorectal cancer cell lines (HT-29, DLD1) with Beclin 1 or UVRAG siRNA were irradiated ± 5-FU. DNA damage (pATM, pH2Ax, 53BP1, RAD51), cell death (annexin V, caspase-3, clonogenic survival), and centrosome number (γ-tubulin staining), were determined. Beclin 1 protein expression was analyzed in pretreatment endoscopic biopsies from 96 rectal carcinoma patients who received radiation + 5-FU followed by surgery. Results: Beclin 1 or UVRAG knockdown was shown to enhance DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and cell death induced by radiation ± 5-FU. Suppression of either gene increased the percentage of irradiated cells with nuclear foci expressing 53BP1 (nonhomologous end joining), but not RAD51 (homologous recombination). Beclin 1 was shown to regulate UVRAG, and a UVRAG deletion mutant defective in Beclin 1 binding decreased protection against radiation-induced DSBs. Knockdown of Beclin 1 or UVRAG increased centrosome number in irradiated cells. While autophagy inhibition by ATG5 or LC3 siRNA enhanced radiation-induced DSBs, they did not alter centrosome number suggesting independence from autophagy. In rectal carcinomas, high vs low level Beclin 1 expression was detected in 56 (58.3%) and 40 (41.7%) tumors, respectively. Pre-treatment Beclin 1 was not associated with clinicopathological variables. However, high vs low Beclin 1 predicted a significantly reduced pathological response (macroscopic vs. microscopic or no residual tumor) to chemoradiation (high: 14.2% vs. low: 40%; p = 0.017). High vs low Beclin 1 was independently associated with poorer overall survival (HR, 4.30; 95% CI, 1.42-16.47; p = 0.009). Conclusions: Beclin 1 and UVRAG confer protection against radiation-induced DNA damage and maintain centrosome stability. The ability of Beclin 1 overexpression to confer resistance to chemoradiation, suggests its potential utility as a predictive biomarker in rectal cancer.

Abstract Purpose: We examined the prognostic impact of specific KRAS mutations in patients with stage III colon adenocarcinoma receiving adjuvant FOLFOX alone or combined with cetuximab in a phase III trial (N0147). Analysis was restricted to BRAF–wild-type tumors, because BRAF mutation was associated with poor prognosis, and BRAF and KRAS mutations are mutually exclusive. Experimental Design: The seven most common KRAS mutations in codon 12 and codon 13 were examined in 2,478 BRAF–wild-type tumors. Because KRAS mutations in codon 12 (n = 779) or 13 (n = 220) were not predictive of adjuvant cetuximab benefit, study arms were pooled for analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated by HRs using Cox models. Results: KRAS mutations in codon 12 (multivariate HR, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, CI, 1.28–1.80; P < 0.0001) or codon 13 (multivariate HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.04–1.77; P = 0.0248) were significantly associated with shorter DFS compared with patients with wild-type KRAS/BRAF tumors, independent of covariates. KRAS codon 12 mutations were independently associated with proficient mismatch repair (P < 0.0001), proximal tumor site (P < 0.0001), low grade, age, and sex, whereas codon 13 mutations were associated with proximal site (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: KRAS mutations in either codon 12 or 13 are associated with inferior survival in patients with resected stage III colon cancer. These data highlight the importance of accurate molecular characterization and the significant role of KRAS mutations in both codons in the progression of this malignancy in the adjuvant setting. Clin Cancer Res; 20(11); 3033–43. ©2014 AACR.

Abstract Abundant epidemiologic evidence indicates that regular and long-term use of aspirin is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of colorectal cancer. The long duration of aspirin needed to prevent colorectal cancer is believed to be due to inhibition of precursor lesions known as adenomas, the recurrence of which is inhibited by aspirin in randomized trials. Aspirin intake has also been associated with a statistically significant improvement in patient survival after curative resection of colorectal cancer in large observational studies. In these cohorts, the survival benefit of aspirin was shown to depend upon the level of COX-2 expression in the primary colorectal cancer. More recent analysis of patient tumors from these observational cohorts suggests that the benefit of aspirin may be limited to specific molecular subtypes. Aspirin intake following colorectal cancer resection was associated with a significant improvement of survival in patients whose tumors carried mutant, but not wild-type, copies of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3KCA) gene, especially tumors that overexpressed COX-2. A mechanistic explanation is suggested by the finding that inhibition of COX-mediated prostaglandin E2 synthesis by aspirin attenuates PI3K signaling activity that is known to regulate cancer cell proliferation and survival. Aspirin has also been shown to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancers bearing wild-type, but not mutant alleles of the BRAFV600E oncogene. Although provocative, the potential utility of these molecular markers for predicting aspirin efficacy awaits prospective evaluation in clinical trials. If validated, these findings may support a personalized approach to using aspirin for the therapy of colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 20(5); 1087–94. ©2013 AACR.

BACKGROUNDA point mutation (V600E) in the BRAF oncogene is a prognostic biomarker and may predict for nonresponse to anti‐EGFR antibody therapy in patients with colorectal carcinoma. BRAFV600E mutations are frequently detected in tumors with microsatellite instability and indicate a sporadic origin. We used a mutation‐specific antibody to examine mutant BRAFV600E protein expression and its concordance with BRAFV600E mutation data.METHODSPrimary stage III colon carcinomas were analyzed for BRAFV600E mutations in exon 15, and 50 BRAFV600E mutation carriers and 25 wild‐type tumors were selected for analysis of BRAF proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC was performed in archival tissue specimens using a pan‐BRAF antibody and a mutation‐specific antibody against BRAFV600E proteins. Staining was scored by 2 pathologists who were blinded to clinical and mutation data.RESULTSUsing a pan‐BRAF antibody, total BRAF protein expression was observed in the tumor cell cytoplasm in 74 of 75 colon carcinomas. A mutation‐specific antibody identified diffuse cytoplasmic staining of mutant BRAFV600E proteins in 49 of 74 cancers. Analysis using a polymerase chain reaction‐based assay revealed that all 49 of these cancers carried BRAFV600E mutations. In contrast, BRAFV600E staining was absent in all 25 tumors that carried wild‐type copies of BRAF.CONCLUSIONSA BRAF mutation‐specific (V600E) antibody detected tumors with BRAFV600E mutations and exhibited complete concordance with a DNA‐based method. These results support the use of IHC as a simplified strategy to screen colorectal cancers for BRAFV600E mutations in clinical practice. Cancer 2013;119:2765–2770. © 2013 American Cancer Society.