Ripoll, Juan G

Obesity is common among critically ill adults, but its association with outcomes during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) remains controversial. We evaluated associations of body mass index (BMI) with mortality and Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO)–defined complications in adults supported with VV ECMO. We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults receiving VV ECMO at four centers (2017–2025). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were ELSO-defined complications. Multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for age, sex, and hospital site; BMI was evaluated as continuous, dichotomized (≥30 vs . <30 kg/m 2 ), and World Health Organization (WHO) obesity class exposures, with interaction testing by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) status. Among 420 patients (median BMI, 31 kg/m 2 ), in-hospital mortality was 62%. Higher BMI was associated with mortality in non–COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS; odds ratio [OR] = 1.06 per 1 kg/m 2 , 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02–1.10, p = 0.003) but not in COVID-19 ARDS (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.94–1.05); there was insufficient evidence of interaction between BMI and COVID-19 ( p = 0.07). Higher BMI was associated with renal complications in both groups and infectious complications in non–COVID-19 ARDS (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02–1.09, p = 0.003). No significant BMI × COVID-19 interaction was detected for any outcomes. These findings do not support an obesity survival paradox during VV ECMO.

Background: The increased popularity and ubiquitous use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for the treatment of diabetes, heart failure, and obesity has led to significant concern for increased risk for perioperative aspiration, given their effects on delayed gastric emptying. This concern is highlighted by many major societies that have published varying guidance on the perioperative management of these medications, given limited data. We conducted a scoping review of the available literature regarding the aspiration risk and aspiration/regurgitant events related to GLP-1 RAs. Methods: A librarian-assisted search was performed using five electronic medical databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science Platform Databases, including Web of Science Core Collection, KCI Korean Journal Database, MEDLINE, and Preprint Citation Index) from inception through March 2024 for articles that reported endoscopic, ultrasound, and nasogastric evaluation for increased residual gastric volume retained food contents, as well as incidences of regurgitation and aspiration events. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text of articles to determine eligibility. Data extraction was performed using customized fields established a priori within a systematic review software system. Results: Of the 3712 citations identified, 24 studies met eligibility criteria. Studies included four prospective, six retrospective, five case series, and nine case reports. The GLP-1 RAs reported in the studies included semaglutide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, and exenatide. All studies, except one case report, reported patients with confounding factors for retained gastric contents and aspiration, such as a history of diabetes, cirrhosis, hypothyroidism, psychiatric disorders, gastric reflux, Barrett’s esophagus, Parkinson’s disease, dysphagia, obstructive sleep apnea, gastric polyps, prior abdominal surgeries, autoimmune diseases, pain, ASA physical status classification, procedural factors (i.e., thyroid surgery associated with risk for nausea, ketamine associated with nausea and secretions), and/or medications associated with delayed gastric emptying (opioids, anticholinergics, antidepressants, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, DPP-IV inhibitors, and antacids). Of the eight studies (three prospective and five retrospective) that evaluated residual contents in both GLP-1 users and non-users, seven studies (n = 7/8) reported a significant increase in residual gastric contents in GLP-1 users compared to non-users (19–56% vs. 5–20%). In the three retrospective studies that evaluated for aspiration events, there was no significant difference in aspiration events, with one study reporting aspiration rates of 4.8 cases per 10,000 in GLP-1 RA users compared to 4.6 cases per 10,000 in nonusers and the remaining two studies reporting one aspiration event in the GLP-1 RA user group and none in the non-user group. In one study that evaluated for regurgitation or reflux by esophageal manometry and pH, there was no significant difference in reflux episodes but a reduction in gastric acidity in the GLP-1 RA user group compared to the non-user group. Conclusions: There is significant variability in the findings reported in the studies, and most of these studies include confounding factors that may influence the association between GLP-1 RAs and an increased risk of aspiration and related events. While GLP-1 RAs do increase residual gastric contents in line with their mechanism of action, the currently available data do not suggest a significant increase in aspiration and regurgitation events associated with their use and the withholding of GLP-1 RAs to reduce aspiration and regurgitation events, as is currently recommended by many major societal guidelines. Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may be helpful in further elucidating the impact of GLP-1 RAs on perioperative aspiration risk.