Fallon, Michael B

ABSTRACT Background and Aim Significant health disparities persist in alcohol‐associated liver disease (ALD), largely driven by social determinants of health (SDOH). However, the influence of neighbourhood‐level SDOH on ALD outcomes remains underexplored. In this study, we aimed to evaluate how neighbourhood‐level SDOH are associated with disease burden, comorbid conditions, and mortality in individuals with ALD. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with ALD in the Banner Health System, representing hospitals across Arizona, California, Nevada, Wyoming and Colorado, from January 2012 to October 2024 using ICD codes. Neighbourhood‐level SDOH were quantified using the Social Deprivation Index (SDI). Patients were stratified into quartiles based on SDI score, with Quartile 4 representing the most socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Primary outcomes included incidence of mortality, cirrhosis, major adverse liver outcome (MALO), Type 2 diabetes mellitus, any cancer, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A multivariable competing risk analysis was performed adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance type, primary language, smoking status, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, aspirin use, statin use, alcohol use disorder and a composite mental‐health/substance‐use disorder variable encompassing depression, anxiety disorders, post‐traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and non‐alcohol substance use disorders. Results Among 11,394 patients with ALD and available SDI data, 6747 had ≥ 365 days of follow‐up. The average age was 51 years and 65.6% were female; 68.8% were non‐Hispanic White, 19.7% Hispanic, 5.9% Native American/Alaskan Native (NA), 3.2% Black, and 0.4% Asian/Pacific Islanders. Patients residing in the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods (Quartile 4) were significantly younger, more likely to be female, had a higher median BMI, and more frequently reported a non‐English primary language compared with those in the least disadvantaged areas (Quartile 1). Patients in the most deprived neighbourhoods were more likely to be Hispanic, Black, or Native American/Alaska Native and to be uninsured or on Medicaid, whereas those in the least disadvantaged neighbourhoods predominantly had private insurance. Individuals in Quartile 4 had increased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.48, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.09–2.01) compared with individuals in Quartile 1. Conclusions In this large and demographically diverse ALD cohort, residing in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhoods was associated with increased risk of mortality. These findings support the need for contextually tailored clinical interventions and broader treatment strategies that target upstream sociocultural and environmental factors that are associated with health outcomes. Addressing neighbourhood‐level SDOH through community engagement, policy reform, and cross‐sector partnerships to improve collaborative care efforts is needed to reduce health disparities in ALD.

Background and Aims: Liver transplant is a specialized treatment for a spectrum of indications that use a scarce resource. Transplant is guided by principles of justice, equity, and benefit, with a constant conflict between competing interests. Organs are a national resource with a goal of equitable distribution across sites. An AASLD guideline for the evaluation and selection of appropriate candidates for transplant has been available since 2005. Methods: A multidisciplinary writing group of liver transplant experts and a librarian convened over 24 months. The writing group reviewed the literature, generated guideline recommendations, and rated the level of evidence for each recommendation based on the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine. The group categorized the strength of recommendations based on the level of evidence, risk-benefit ratio, and patient preferences. Conclusions: Liver transplant is a lifesaving procedure that should be offered to selected patients with clear indications and a reasonable prospect of benefit. The evaluation is designed to identify those in need, to outline hurdles to a successful outcome, and to develop an effective transplant plan. The goal of this document is to provide a template for this process.

Background and Aims: Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) and a hyperdynamic circulation are common complications of advanced liver disease, but the relationship between HPS and cardiac index (CI) is poorly understood. We sought to compare CI in patients with and without HPS and to assess the relationship between CI and symptoms, quality of life, gas exchange, and exercise capacity among liver transplantation (LT) candidates. We performed a cross-sectional analysis within the Pulmonary Vascular Complications of Liver Disease 2 study, a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients being evaluated for LT. We excluded patients with obstructive or restrictive lung disease, intracardiac shunting, and portopulmonary hypertension. We included 214 patients (81 with HPS and 133 controls without HPS). Compared with controls, patients with HPS had a higher CI (least square mean 3.2 L/min/m2, 95% CI 3.1–3.4 vs. 2.8 L/min/m2, 95% CI 2.7–3.0, p < 0.001) after adjustment for age, sex, Model for End-stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) score and beta-blocker use, and a lower systemic vascular resistance. Among all LT candidates, CI was correlated with oxygenation (Alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient r=0.27, p< 0.001), intrapulmonary vasodilatation severity (p < 0.001), and biomarkers of angiogenesis. Higher CI was independently associated with dyspnea and worse functional class and physical quality of life after adjusting for age, sex, MELD-Na, beta-blocker use, and HPS status. HPS was associated with a higher CI among LT candidates. Independent of HPS, higher CI was associated with increased dyspnea and worse functional class, quality of life, and arterial oxygenation.