Nagel, Thomas H.

AbstractObjectiveFirst bite syndrome (FBS) is a rare complication of transoral surgery (TOS) for oropharyngeal cancer (oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [OPSCC]). Risk factors for developing this complication are not well described. In this study, we attempt to identify risks for developing FBS in TOS.Study DesignRetrospective chart review.SettingTertiary care medical center.MethodsThis study was exempted by the Mayo Clinic institutional review board. We performed a review from January 2017 to November 2022 of all patients who underwent TOS for OPSCC by a single provider. Exclusion criteria included less than 6 months follow up, prior treatment of head and neck cancer, or incomplete records. Demographic data, comorbidities, tumor characteristics, surgical details, adjuvant treatment details, functional outcomes, and oncologic outcomes were assessed. Fisher's Exact test and Kruskal‐Wallis rank sum test were used to identify significant variables, and multivariable logistic regression was used to address confounding.ResultsOne hundred and one patients were identified. Eighty‐nine met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow‐up was 34 months (median 33). Seven patients (7.9%) developed FBS. Palatine tumor primary (P = .041), resection of styloglossus/stylopharyngeus (P = .039), and parapharyngeal fat manipulation (P = .015) were associated with the presence of FBS. After adjusting for tumor location, manipulation of parapharyngeal fat maintained significance (P = .025). T and N staging, tumor volume, adjuvant radiation, and ligation of lingual/facial arteries were not associated with the development of FBS. Eighty‐six percent (6/7) of patients had a resolution of FBS at an average of 11.3 months.ConclusionManipulation of the parapharyngeal space is independently associated with developing FBS in TOS in our cohort. Further confirmatory studies are warranted.

Objectives: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is gaining popularity and has been introduced for the treatment of Eagle syndrome. This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TORS for the treatment of Eagle syndrome. Methods: A systematic review of the English language literature using multiple databases was completed for studies describing TORS for Eagle syndrome. The quality of studies and risk of bias were evaluated using the MINORS scoring system. Results: Out of 1495 articles screened, 4 studies met criteria for inclusion in the final analysis. Across all studies, there was a 100% surgical success rate. In total, every patient had some level of symptom improvement with 84% of patients having complete symptom improvement and 16% having partial improvement. Reported estimated blood loss averaged 12.5 mL. A total of 94.7% of patients had no surgical complications and no cases were complicated by postoperative bleeding. Operative time averaged 65 minutes. The average length of stay was 2.1 days. A total of 92% of patients resumed their diet on postoperative day 1, with the remainder resuming on postoperative day 2. MINORS criteria scoring suggested moderate risk of bias in all studies. Conclusion: Based on limited quality evidence, this review suggests that TORS is a safe and effective surgical approach in the treatment of Eagle syndrome with low complication rates. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted.

AbstractBackgroundVelopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is a known complication of transoral surgery (TOS) for oropharyngeal HPV‐mediated squamous cell carcinoma. Controversy exists regarding adequate resection margins for balancing functional and oncologic outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective study was exempted by the IRB. Patients who underwent TOS from January 2017 to October 2022 were included. Patient characteristics, treatment details, and oncologic and functional outcomes were evaluated.ResultsFifty‐five patients were included. Mean and median follow‐up was 34 months. 98% of patients were AJCC stage I/II. Recurrence‐free survival was 96% with no local recurrences.Univariate analysis demonstrated an association between VPI and pT stage (p = 0.035), medial pterygoid resection (p = 0.049), and palatal attachment sacrifice (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed sacrifice of the palatal attachments remained a significant risk for VPI (p = 0.009).ConclusionLoss of soft palate pharyngeal attachments is an independent risk factor for VPI. When oncologically appropriate, the palatal attachments to the pharynx may be preserved.

AbstractBackgroundMargins in transoral surgery for tonsil cancer can be limited by oropharyngeal wall thickness (OWT), but the normal range is not well established.MethodsIn 240 noncancer subjects, OWT was measured bilaterally in the vicinity of the tonsils with MRI. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for interaction of age, sex, location, and obesity.ResultsMean(SD) OWT measured 3.4(0.6) mm posteriorly, 3.7(2.0) mm between the styloglossus and stylopharyngeus, and 5.3(0.8) mm laterally. OWT was greater in men, correlated with obesity, decreased posteriorly and laterally in the 60–80 versus 40–59 year age groups, and increased when styloglossus/stylopharyngeus were closer. OWT was <5 mm in 36.7%–97.9% of locations, with the largest percentage below this threshold located posteriorly.ConclusionsOWT is frequently <5 mm, particularly in the posterior and intermuscular areas, suggesting that a smaller surgical margin may need to be accepted in transoral tonsil cancer surgery for anatomic reasons.

AbstractBackgroundThe aim of the study was to describe a novel technique for reinforcement of salvage laryngectomy closure using a bipedicled musculofascial submental flap.MethodsA retrospective cohort study design identified patients who underwent salvage laryngectomy reinforcement with a bipedicled submental hammock flap between January 2008 and December 2016 were compared to salvage laryngectomy patients treated with primary closure of the neopharynx during the same time period. Pharyngocutaneous fistula rates were compared between groups.ResultsPharyngocutaneous fistula rate in the submental hammock group (2/31, 6.5%) was significantly lower compared to the primary closure group (14/45, 31%, P < .05).ConclusionThe bipedicled musculofascial submental hammock flap is a viable method for reinforcement of salvage laryngectomy defects. It has a favorable pharyngocutaneous fistula rate compared to primary closure alone and has unique advantages over conventional methods of reinforcement.