Back to Authors

Patel, Andrew K.

Mayo Clinic

PDX ENT and Audiology Medical Group Portland Oregon USA

Citations 2

Reply to Letter to the Editor regarding “Surgical armamentarium for salvage laryngectomy closure reinforcements”
Hayden, Richard E. , Mullin, David, Patel, Andrew K., Nagel, Thomas H. , Howard, Brittany E. , Hinni, Michael L., Lott, David L., Donald, Carrlene B., Chang, Brent A.

Head & Neck | May 31, 2021 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2559-2559

10.1002/hed.26759 Get It

Bipedicled submental musculofascial “hammock” flap for salvage laryngectomy closure reinforcement
Hayden, Richard E. , Chang, Brent A. , Mullin, David, Patel, Andrew K., Nagel, Thomas H. , Howard, Brittany E. , Hinni, Michael L., Donald, Carrlene B., Chang, Brent A , Lott, David G.

Head & Neck | October 12, 2020 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 198-202

10.1002/hed.26473 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe aim of the study was to describe a novel technique for reinforcement of salvage laryngectomy closure using a bipedicled musculofascial submental flap.MethodsA retrospective cohort study design identified patients who underwent salvage laryngectomy reinforcement with a bipedicled submental hammock flap between January 2008 and December 2016 were compared to salvage laryngectomy patients treated with primary closure of the neopharynx during the same time period. Pharyngocutaneous fistula rates were compared between groups.ResultsPharyngocutaneous fistula rate in the submental hammock group (2/31, 6.5%) was significantly lower compared to the primary closure group (14/45, 31%, P < .05).ConclusionThe bipedicled musculofascial submental hammock flap is a viable method for reinforcement of salvage laryngectomy defects. It has a favorable pharyngocutaneous fistula rate compared to primary closure alone and has unique advantages over conventional methods of reinforcement.