Rawstron, Andy C.

Abstract Abstract 2883 CLL-like monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) shares common immunophenotypic features and cytogenetic abnormalities with CLL and is generally perceived as its premalignant state. The World Health Organization has set a consensus cut-off of 5×109/L circulating B cells to discriminate between what constitutes ‘disease’ and what not. However, the clonal size within MBL is extremely variable. High-count (HC), clinical MBL is associated with absolute lymphocytosis and progresses to CLL requiring treatment at a rate of 1–2% per year, whereas low-count (LC) MBL is found in the general population through high-sensitivity techniques and carries a risk of progression that is limited if any. Given the high frequency of CLL-like MBL in the general population, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms and also identify biological markers endowing malignant potential that may distinguish between the different forms. To this end, we performed a detailed immunogenetic profiling of 334 CLL-like MBL cases (78 LC and 256 HC) for a total of 355 productive VDJ rearrangements (including double rearrangements), 91 from LC MBL and 264 from HC MBL. We also compared the immunoglobulin (IG) gene repertoires of MBL to 544 CLL Rai Stage 0 (CLL-0) that were part of an IG sequence dataset of 7424 CLL cases previously analyzed by our group. LC and HC MBL had distinct IG gene repertoires, with over-representation of the IGHV1–69 and IGHV4–34 genes in HC and the IGHV4–59/61 genes in LC MBL, respectively (p<0.001). The HC MBL repertoire exhibited clear similarities to CLL-0 in terms of IGHV gene usage (similar frequencies of IGHV1–69 and IGHV4–34). Regarding somatic hypermutation, no differences were identified between LC MBL versus HC MBL versus CLL-0, in that the frequency of mutated rearrangements (<98% identity to the germline) was overall similar (LC MBL: 72.5%, HC MBL: 76.1%, CLL-0: 75%). In this respect, all the aforementioned subgroups differed significantly (p<0.001) from the frequency previously reported by us in CLL where only 55% of rearrangements carried mutated IGHV genes. We finally analyzed the expression of stereotyped B cell receptor (BcR) IGs, identified through a cluster analysis of the MBL sequences together with all CLL sequences from our cohort and 5494 non-CLL IG sequences retrieved from public databases. Overall, only 6/91 (5.5%) LC MBL rearrangements could be clustered with other sequences in subsets with stereotyped BcRs. Two of these six LC MBL cases were clustered together with IG sequences from various entities, including CLL, other lymphomas and autoimmune diseases; thus, they were considered to carry ‘public’ BcR stereotypes. In contrast, HC MBL showed a significantly (p=0.0002) higher frequency of ‘CLL-specific’ BcR stereotypes versus LC MBL, with 60/264 (22.7%) HC MBL cases carrying stereotyped VH CDR3s. This frequency was comparable to the one observed in CLL-0 (20.2%). Notably, a gradation was observed in the frequency of BcR IG stereotypy depending on the absolute count of CLL-like cells, starting with 5.5% in LC MBL, raising to 22.7–20.2% in in HC MBL/CLL-0 and, finally, peaking at 30.4% in the entire CLL cohort as previously reported. Altogether, these findings suggest that rather than a true premalignant condition, LC MBL may merely reflect immune senescence or result from persistent antigen stimulation. On the other hand, HC MBL appears to be a continuum with Rai stage 0 in the evolution to clinically overt CLL, being maybe one step behind where it requires either additional genetic hits or simply extra time to cross the numerical border that discriminates it from CLL. Hence, the identification of molecular genetic markers that may predict progression of HC MBL/CLL-0 into full-fledged CLL is strongly warranted. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Genentech: Research Funding; GlaxoSmith Klein: Research Funding; Teva/Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract BACKGROUND. The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) at the level of 0.01%/10-4 or above is a strong independent predictor of reduced progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with CLL treated with chemoimmunotherapy. Although newer agents such as B-cell receptor pathway inhibitors can result in prolonged survival without achieving complete response, there remains a important role for MRD analysis in assessing therapeutic strategies aimed at disease eradication and cure. This is particularly important in front-line trials for fit patients which now require at least five years of follow-up if PFS is used as an endpoint. The feasibility of using MRD as a surrogate or intermediate endpoint for accelerated approval of new treatments is under review by regulatory agencies but further prospective validation is required. At the same time technology is rapidly evolving and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies now detect MRD at the 0.0001%/10-6 level. It is therefore important to determine the most effective approaches for quantifying MRD that are compatible with previous studies but sufficiently sensitive for current treatments. AIMS. This collaborative project had two objectives. First, to identify the simplest and most flexible flow cytometry panel capable of detecting MRD at the 0.01%/10-4 or lower, that is compatible with published data and independent of instrument/reagent manufacturer. Second, to compare the flow cytometry approach with HTS analysis using the ClonoSEQ assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, WA). METHODS AND RESULTS. A core panel of antibodies for MRD detection was identified by testing an 8-marker combination in 52 samples (27 post-treatment and 25 dilution study) and re-analysing data with serial exclusion of single markers to determine redundancy. A 1-tube core panel of CD19, CD20, CD5, CD43, CD79b, and CD81 was identified and validated against the previously published 2-tube 6-marker and 4-tube 4-marker ERIC panels in 76 samples (19 post-treatment and 57 dilution study). The results showed good concordance (for log-transformed data above the LoQ, linearity=0.977, Pearson correlation co-efficient=0.983, average difference=0.026 log, 95% limit of agreement 0.20log) and a limit of detection of 0.001%/10-5 for the 1-tube core panel. Inter-operator variation was similar to CML MRD monitoring with both experienced operators, or inexperienced cytometrists after ~1 hour of specific education, achieving a 95% limit of agreement less than 0.3log in samples with MRD levels ranging from 0.0001 – 100%. The flow cytometry approach was compared with the ClonoSEQ HTS assay in 109 samples (21 dilution study and 88 post-treatment samples, complete data currently available on 13/88). The assay was applicable to the vast majority CLL patients, often with two clonal markers. There was 94% concordance at the 0.01% (10-4) threshold (15 samples with ≥0.01% CLL by both methods, 14 samples with <0.01% by both methods, 1 sample with 0.03% CLL by HTS and <0.003% CLL by flow cytometry, and 1 sample with 0.005% CLL by HTS and 0.012% by flow cytometry. HTS detected CLL IGH sequences in 22% (7/31) samples with no detectable CLL cells by flow cytometry (i.e. CLL level 0.0001-0.001%, 3/13 patient samples and 4/18 dilution samples). HTS demonstrated a relatively high variability in quantification, as seen in previous studies, but with a clear superiority in the limit of detection and good linearity (linearity=0.905, Pearson correlation co-efficient=0.870, average difference=0.078 log, 95% limit of agreement 1.5 log). CONCLUSIONS. The 1-tube 6-marker flow cytometry core panel is compatible with published studies, manufacturer-independent and flexible, providing directly quantitative results to 0.001%/10-5 without requiring a pre-treatment sample. HTS requires further work to standardise the quantitative analysis and prospective validation but the ClonoSEQ assay is applicable to >95% of CLL patients, does not require viable cells and is extremely sensitive, detecting residual disease in a significant proportion of cases with <0.01% CLL. The results indicate that flow cytometry and HTS are complementary technologies with a combined approach offering the most reliable way of quantifying CLL at the 0.01%/10-4 threshold while allowing higher sensitivity in clinical trials aimed at disease eradication. Disclosures Rawstron: Roche: Honoraria; Biogen Idec: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; BD Biosciences: Intrasure reagent Patents & Royalties; Celgene: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria. Williamson:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sanders:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Equity Ownership. Robins:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Hallek:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria. Hillmen:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Key Points Low-count and high-count monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) have distinct immunogenetic signatures, with only the latter resembling CLL. Rather than a true premalignant condition, low-count MBL may merely reflect immune senescence or result from persistent antigen stimulation.