Back to Authors

Chakravarti, Arnab

0000-0002-5392-8721

Mayo Clinic

Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Citations 15

Synthetic Lethality of PARP Inhibition and Ionizing Radiation is p53-dependent
Sizemore, Steven T. , Mohammad, Rahman, Nowsheen, Somaira , Ostrowski, Michael C. , Chakravarti, Arnab , Xia, Fen , Chakravarti, Arnab , Nowsheen, Somaira , Sizemore, Gina M. , Yu, Hao , Chakravarti, Arnab

Molecular Cancer Research | March 28, 2018 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1092-1102

10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-18-0106 Get It

Abstract PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are potentially effective therapeutic agents capable of inducing synthetic lethality in tumors with deficiencies in homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA repair such as those carrying BRCA1 mutations. However, BRCA mutations are rare, the majority of tumors are proficient in HR repair, and thus most tumors are resistant to PARPi. Previously, we observed that ionizing radiation (IR) initiates cytoplasmic translocation of BRCA1 leading to suppression of HR-mediated DNA repair and induction of synthetic PARPi lethality in wild-type BRCA1 and HR-proficient tumor cells. The tumor suppressor p53 was identified as a key factor that regulates DNA damage–induced BRCA1 cytoplasmic sequestration following IR. However, the role of p53 in IR-induced PARPi sensitization remains unclear. This study elucidates the role of p53 in IR-induced PARPi cytotoxicity in HR-proficient cancer cells and suggests p53 status may help define a patient population that might benefit from this treatment strategy. Sensitization to PARPi following IR was determined in vitro and in vivo utilizing human breast and glioma tumor cells carrying wild-type BRCA1 and p53, and in associated cells in which p53 function was modified by knockdown or mutation. In breast and glioma cells with proficient HR repair, IR-induced BRCA1 cytoplasmic sequestration, HR repair inhibition, and subsequent PARPi sensitization in vitro and in vivo was dependent upon functional p53. Implications: Implications: p53 status determines PARP inhibitor sensitization by ionizing radiation in multiple BRCA1 and HR-proficient tumor types and may predict which patients are most likely to benefit from combination therapy. Mol Cancer Res; 16(7); 1092–102. ©2018 AACR.
Dose-Dense Temozolomide for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial
Wang, Meihua , Aldape, Kenneth , Hegi, Monika E. , Jaeckle, Kurt A. , Armstrong, Terri S. , Won, Minhee , Blumenthal, Deborah T. , Mahajan, Anita , Schultz, Christopher J. , Erridge, Sara , Baumert, Brigitta G. , Hopkins, Kristen I., Tzuk-Shina, Tzahala, Brown, Paul D. , Chakravarti, Arnab , Curran, Walter J. , Mehta, Minesh P. , Chakravarti, Arnab , Gilbert, Mark R. , Stupp, Roger , Wefel, Jeffrey S. , Armstrong, Terri S , Mehta, Minesh P , Chakravarti, Arnab

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 7, 2013 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 32 | Pages: 4085-4091

10.1200/jco.2013.49.6968 Get It

Purpose Radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide is the standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylation status may be an important determinant of treatment response. Dose-dense (DD) temozolomide results in prolonged depletion of MGMT in blood mononuclear cells and possibly in tumor. This trial tested whether DD temozolomide improves overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Patients and Methods This phase III trial enrolled patients older than age 18 years with a Karnofsky performance score of ≥ 60 with adequate tissue. Stratification included clinical factors and tumor MGMT methylation status. Patients were randomly assigned to standard temozolomide (arm 1) or DD temozolomide (arm 2) for 6 to 12 cycles. The primary end point was OS. Secondary analyses evaluated the impact of MGMT status. Results A total of 833 patients were randomly assigned to either arm 1 or arm 2 (1,173 registered). No statistically significant difference was observed between arms for median OS (16.6 v 14.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.03; P = .63) or median PFS (5.5 v 6.7 months; HR, 0.87; P = .06). Efficacy did not differ by methylation status. MGMT methylation was associated with improved OS (21.2 v 14 months; HR, 1.74; P < .001), PFS (8.7 v 5.7 months; HR, 1.63; P < .001), and response (P = .012). There was increased grade ≥ 3 toxicity in arm 2 (34% v 53%; P < .001), mostly lymphopenia and fatigue. Conclusion This study did not demonstrate improved efficacy for DD temozolomide for newly diagnosed GBM, regardless of methylation status. However, it did confirm the prognostic significance of MGMT methylation. Feasibility of large-scale accrual, prospective tumor collection, and molecular stratification was demonstrated.