Vermeire, Séverine

Abstract Background and Aims To report results from VISIBLE 2, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial evaluating a new subcutaneous [SC] vedolizumab formulation as maintenance treatment in adults with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease [CD]. Methods Following open-label vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous induction therapy at Weeks 0 and 2, Week 6 clinical responders (≥70-point decrease in CD Activity Index [CDAI] score from baseline) were randomised 2:1 to receive double-blind maintenance vedolizumab 108 mg SC or placebo every 2 weeks until Week 50. Assessments at Week 52 included clinical remission [primary endpoint; CDAI ≤150], enhanced clinical response [≥100-point decrease in CDAI from baseline], corticosteroid-free clinical remission among patients using a corticosteroid at baseline, clinical remission in anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF]-naïve patients, and safety. Results Following vedolizumab intravenous induction, 275 patients were randomised to vedolizumab SC and 135 to placebo maintenance. At Week 52, 48.0% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC versus 34.3% receiving placebo were in clinical remission [p = 0.008]. Enhanced clinical response at Week 52 was achieved by 52.0% versus 44.8% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC versus placebo, respectively [p = 0.167]. At Week 52, 45.3% and 18.2% of patients receiving vedolizumab SC and placebo, respectively, were in corticosteroid-free clinical remission, and 48.6% of anti-TNF-naïve patients receiving vedolizumab SC and 42.9% receiving placebo were in clinical remission. Injection site reaction was the only new safety finding observed for vedolizumab SC [2.9%]. Conclusions Vedolizumab SC is an effective and safe maintenance therapy in patients with CD who responded to two infusions of vedolizumab intravenous induction therapy.

Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL) is a once-daily, oral, preferential Janus kinase 1 inhibitor in development for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. FIL for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) was evaluated in the phase 2b/3 randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled SELECTION study (NCT02914522). Long-term use of corticosteroids (CS) is associated with significant side effects. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to assess the CS-sparing effects of FIL in the SELECTION study. Methods Patients (18–75 years old) with moderately to severely active UC were randomized (2:2:1) to receive FIL 100 mg (n = 564), FIL 200 mg (n = 507) or PBO (n = 280) once daily orally for up to 11 weeks (induction study). At week 11, FIL induction responders were rerandomized 2:1 to continue their induction FIL dose or to receive PBO (maintenance study). CS use was kept stable up to week 14, at which point mandatory CS tapering occurred. CS could be resumed during the maintenance study; however, if the baseline CS dose was exceeded this was considered treatment failure. In this post hoc analysis, CS-free remission was defined as remission at week 58 (endoscopic subscore ≤ 1, rectal bleeding subscore = 0 and ≥ 1-point decrease in stool frequency subscore to achieve 0 or 1) without systemic or localized CS use that was indicated for UC in the previous 1, 3, 6 or 8 months. Results The baseline characteristics of patients in the maintenance study were similar across treatment groups (Table 1). Of the 92 patients receiving CS at maintenance baseline (week 11; maintenance week 0) who received FIL 200 mg during the maintenance study, 25 (27%) were in remission at week 58 and had been continuously CS-free for at least the previous 6 months (Table 2). The proportion of CS-free remitters in the FIL 200 mg group was consistently higher than with PBO (Table 2). In patients taking CS at maintenance baseline who had continued CS-use post baseline, lower median prednisone dosing was observed with FIL 200 mg than with PBO throughout the maintenance study (maximum difference at week 34 [maintenance week 23]: 5.0 mg vs 13.8 mg) (Figure 1). In SELECTION, a total of 199 patients received FIL 200 mg in the maintenance study, of whom 74 (37.2%) were in remission at week 58; of these 74 patients, 69 (93.2%) were continuously CS-free for at least the previous 6 months (Figure 2). Conclusion In this post hoc analysis of SELECTION maintenance study data, FIL 200 mg was effective in reducing and eliminating CS use through to week 58 in patients with moderately to severely active UC. The vast majority of patients taking FIL 200 mg who were in remission at week 58 had not taken CS in the previous 6 months.

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ), an anti-a4β7 integrin antibody that selectively blocks lymphocyte trafficking to the gut, is approved for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD). This post hoc analysis of data from the VISIBLE 2 trial evaluated early patient-reported outcomes assessed within the first 14 days of VDZ induction. Methods VISIBLE 2 (NCT02611817; EudraCT 2015-000481-58) was a phase 3, multicentre, placebo-controlled study, evaluating the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous VDZ for maintenance treatment in patients with moderately to severely active CD. Efficacy was assessed based on CD Activity Index (CDAI). Patients received induction treatment with intravenous (IV) VDZ 300 mg open-label at Weeks 0 and 2. For this analysis, responses to VDZ were assessed using CDAI sub-scores for patient-reported abdominal pain (AP) and stool frequency (SF) collected daily via electronic diary in the first 14 days of VDZ treatment (Day 1 to 15) in all patients receiving ≥1 VDZ dose at induction. Descriptive statistics were used. Results The analysis included 611 patients (mean [SD] age 37.6 [13.4] years; CD duration 9.0 [8.1] years); 323 (53%) were male; 228 (37%) had severe disease (CDAI >330) at baseline; and 350 (57%) were anti-TNF-experienced. In the first 14 days of VDZ IV induction, the rate of patients with daily SF≤3 increased from 30% at baseline (Day 1) to 47.7% on Day 15. Increases were similar in both anti-TNF-naïve vs. anti-TNF-experienced patients and in patients with severe vs. moderate disease (Figure 1). Mean baseline SF was reduced from 6.4 to 5.0 at Day 15 in patients with severe disease and from 4.3 to 3.5 in patients with moderate disease. Overall, the proportion of patients rating AP as severe/moderate declined from baseline to Day 15 of induction (from 14.6% to 8.2% for severe AP and from 60.7% to 40.6% for moderate AP). Similar Day 1-to-15 reductions were reported in both anti-TNF-naïve (severe AP: 14.2% to 9.2%; moderate AP: 62.6% to 44.6%) and anti-TNF-experienced patients (severe AP: 14.8% to 7.4%; moderate AP: 59.3% to 37.7%), respectively. Although a minority of patients (6.3%) in the sub-group with moderate AP at baseline had worse pain at Day 15, there were early improvements in AP ratings for most patients reporting severe or moderate AP at baseline (Figure 2). Conclusion This post hoc analysis of daily patient-reported SF and AP in the VISIBLE 2 CD study indicates an early onset of response to VDZ IV induction within the first 14 days of treatment.

Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective and reversible Janus kinase inhibitor.U-ACCOMPLISH is one of two phase 3 induction trials that evaluated the safety and efficacy of UPA 45 mg once daily (QD) in adults with ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods U-ACCOMPLISH was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT03653026) that enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe UC (defined as adapted Mayo score 5–9 with centrally read endoscopic score 2–3) who had inadequate response, loss of response, or intolerance to aminosalicylates, immunosuppressants, corticosteroids and/or biologics. Patients were randomized 2:1 to UPA 45 mg QD or placebo (PBO) for 8 weeks. At week 8, responders entered the maintenance phase and non-responders entered the extended treatment period to receive open-label UPA 45 mg QD for additional 8 weeks.The primary endpoint (clinical remission per adapted Mayo Score) and ranked secondary endpoints including symptomatic, endoscopic– histologic evaluations from the 8-week PBO-controlled period are reported here. Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation for missing data due to COVID-19 are reported. Results 522 patients were randomized (UPA, n=345; PBO, n=177); the intent-to-treat population included 341 patients in UPA and 174 patients in PBO group. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between groups; 50.7% and 51.1% were biologic inadequate responders in UPA and PBO groups, respectively (Table 1). A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving UPA 45 mg QD (33.5%) versus PBO (4.1%) achieved the primary endpoint (adjusted treatment difference: 29.0% [23.2, 34.7]; P<0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving UPA versus PBO also achieved all ranked secondary endpoints (all P<0.001; Figure 1).Serious adverse events were reported by 3.2% and 4.5% of patients in UPA and PBO groups, respectively (Table 2). Similar rates of serious infection were observed in both groups (0.6%); 2 events each of herpes zoster and opportunistic infection were reported in UPA group. No active tuberculosis, malignancy, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events, or deaths were reported in the study. One patient with venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and 1 patient with gastrointestinal perforation were reported in the placebo group. Conclusion In U-ACCOMPLISH, 8-week UPA 45 mg QD induction treatment led to statistically significant improvements in clinical, endoscopic, and combined endoscopic-histologic endpoints. The treatment was well tolerated, and the safety profile and AE prevalence was comparable with previous studies of UPA with no new safety signals identified.

Abstract Background and Aims Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Here, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib re-treatment following treatment interruption in patients with ulcerative colitis. Methods Here, patients with clinical response to tofacitinib 10 mg b.d. induction therapy were randomised to receive placebo in OCTAVE Sustain. Those experiencing treatment failure after Week 8 of OCTAVE Sustain entered OCTAVE Open and re-initiated tofacitinib 10 mg b.d. [re-treatment subpopulation]; efficacy and safety data are presented up to Month 36 of OCTAVE Open. Results Median time to treatment failure following interruption was 169 (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.0–179.0) and 123 [95% CI, 91.0–168.0] days for induction remitters, and induction responders but non-remitters, respectively. Following re-treatment with tofacitinib, rates (non-responder imputation after a patient discontinued; latest observation carried forward imputation after a patient advanced to a subsequent study [NRI-LOCF]) of clinical response, remission, and endoscopic improvement were 74.0%, 39.0%, and 55.0% at Month 2, and 48.5%, 37.4%, and 42.4% at Month 36, respectively. Among induction remitters and induction responders but non-remitters, clinical response rates at Month 36 were 60.6% and 42.4% [NRI-LOCF], respectively. Efficacy was recaptured regardless of prior tumour necrosis factor inhibitor failure status. The safety profile of tofacitinib 10 mg b.d. re-treatment was consistent with the overall cohort and demonstrated no new safety risks associated with exposure of ≤36 months. Conclusions Median time to treatment failure was numerically higher in induction remitters versus induction responders but non-remitters. Following treatment interruption, efficacy was safely and successfully recaptured with tofacitinib 10 mg b.d. re-treatment in a substantial proportion of patients [ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01458574;NCT01470612].

Abstract Aims SELECTION (NCT02914522) Maintenance evaluated filgotinib (FIL), a preferential JAK1 inhibitor, as maintenance therapy for patients (pts) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) who achieved clinical remission or Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) response after 10 weeks of FIL 200mg QD, FIL 100mg QD or placebo (PBO) induction. Methods Pts randomized to FIL induction were rerandomized 2:1 to their induction FIL dose or PBO; pts randomized to PBO induction continued PBO maintenance. Steroid tapering was mandatory. The primary endpoint was clinical remission at Week 58. Key secondary endpoints and exploratory endpoints were assessed at Week 58. Results 664 pts were treated in the Maintenance Study (n=93, 270, and 301 from induction with PBO, FIL 100mg and FIL 200mg); efficacy analyses included only FIL induction pts. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced across treatment arms; 40% were biologic experienced. Significantly higher proportion of pts on FIL 200mg or FIL 100mg were in clinical remission vs PBO. Significantly higher proportions of pts achieved key secondary endpoints with FIL 200mg vs PBO. More pts on FIL 200 mg or FIL 100mg achieved an MCS response and endoscopic improvement vs PBO. Incidences of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were similar across arms. Serious infection (<2%) and herpes zoster (<1%) were infrequent among FIL-treated patients. There were no venous thromboses, including pulmonary embolism, among FIL-treated pts. Two pts on FIL 200mg died, both AEs leading to death were considered unrelated to FIL. Conclusions FIL 200mg and FIL 100mg were effective as maintenance treatment for pts with moderately to severely active UC who had achieved clinical response to FIL induction treatment. FIL 200 mg met all key secondary endpoints including endoscopic, histologic and 6-month corticosteroid-free remission. FIL was well tolerated in pts with moderate to severely active UC. Funding Agencies None

Abstract Aims The SELECTION (NCT02914522) Induction Studies evaluated the efficacy/safety of filgotinib (FIL), a preferential JAK1 inhibitor, as induction therapy for patients (pts) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) who were biologic-naïve but failed conventional therapy (Induction Study A) or failed prior biologics (Induction Study B). Methods Pts were randomized 2:2:1 to once–daily FIL 200mg, FIL 100mg or placebo (PBO). The primary (clinical remission), key secondary (Mayo Clinic Score [MCS] remission, endoscopic remission, and histologic remission), and exploratory endpoints (MCS response and endoscopic improvement) were assessed at Week 10. Results In both studies, baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar across treatment groups. In Study A, 659 pts were randomized and treated. Baseline mean MCS was 8.6 and 56% had a Mayo endoscopic subscore (ES)=3. A significantly higher proportion of biologic-naïve pts on FIL 200mg achieved clinical remission vs PBO and all key secondary endpoints (Table). In Study B, 689 pts were randomized and treated. Baseline mean MCS was 9.3 and 78% had ES=3. Prior treatment failures were: anti-TNF (86%), vedolizumab (52%) and both (dual-refractory; 43%). A significantly higher proportion of biologic-experienced pts on FIL 200mg achieved clinical remission vs PBO. In Studies A and B, a greater proportion of pts on FIL 200 mg achieved an MCS response and endoscopic improvement vs PBO. The rates of AEs, serious AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were similar across FIL and PBO groups during induction. In the PBO, FIL 100mg and FIL 200mg groups, serious infections occurred in 0.7%, 0.7% and 0.4% pts in Study A and 1.4%, 1.4% and 0.8% pts in Study B; H Zoster occurred in <1% in both groups for both cohorts. Conclusions SELECTION included a high proportion of dual-refractory pts, and pts with severe endoscopic disease. Both doses of FIL were well tolerated. Filgotinib 200mg was effective induction therapy for both biologic-naïve/-experienced pts with moderately to severely active UC. Funding Agencies None