Schmid, Annina B

Abstract Pain treatments have modest effects. Health outcomes might be improved if treatments are matched to mechanisms underlying the persistence and biopsychosocial impact of an individual's pain. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) defines 3 mechanistic pain descriptors presumed to involve different mechanisms—nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic. Although treatments to address each descriptor have been proposed, there is no consensus on how to assign descriptors to clinical presentations. A recent consensus identified candidate clinical features to discriminate between descriptors in clinical practice and research. These need refinement to progress towards a tool. This study aimed to determine the rank and relative weight of identified clinical features to aid discrimination between mechanistic pain descriptors. Candidate clinical features (n = 196) were refined by the IASP Terminology Task Force to converge similar and remove redundant features. The Task Force (n = 24) and an expert panel (n = 39) ranked features using 1000minds conjoint analysis software and assigned weights based on discrete pairwise choices. Participants nominated from pairs of scenarios, which most likely indicated that pain aligned predominantly to a descriptor. Highest ranked features for neuropathic and nociplastic pain were aligned with IASP Clinical Criteria. Criteria for nociceptive pain have not been established. A ranked list of features shared by 2 mechanisms (indicating mixed mechanisms) was also identified. This study identified expert consensus on the highest ranked clinical features with potential to discriminate between pain descriptors, reflective of different underlying mechanisms. This study extends current frameworks by identifying and refining key discriminators for future operationalisation and validation.

Abstract Introduction: Evidence increasingly shows small nerve fibre pathology in subsets of people with fibromyalgia through skin biopsy, corneal confocal microscopy, and microneurography. However, blood-based biomarkers of ongoing neuronal damage, particularly neurofilament light chain (NfL), an axonal structural protein, are not well established. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate serum NfL concentrations in fibromyalgia compared with other chronic pain conditions and assess their relationship with neuropathic-like pain. Methods: We measured serum NfL using Simoa SR-X NF Light v2 digital-immunoassay in 60 participants with fibromyalgia, 61 with endometriosis (another traditionally considered non-neuropathic pain condition), 24 with small fibre neuropathy (a recognised neuropathic pain condition), and 30 healthy controls. Serum NfL concentrations were compared between the groups controlling for age and body mass index. Neuropathic-like pain was assessed using the painDETECT questionnaire for fibromyalgia and endometriosis and NeuPSIG grading criteria for small fibre neuropathy. Results: Compared with healthy controls (mean concentration = 6.77 pg/mL, Z-score = −1.15), serum NfL concentrations were significantly elevated in fibromyalgia (mean concentration = 8.52 pg/mL P = 0.048; Z-score = −0.30, and P = 0.006) and small fibre neuropathy (mean concentration = 8.98 pg/mL, P = 0.004; Z-score = 0.23, P = 0.0001), with endometriosis representing an intermediate phenotype (mean concentration = 5.57 pg/mL, P = 0.44; Z-score = −0.41, P = 0.024). Using PainDETECT, 44% of fibromyalgia and 26% of endometriosis participants met likely neuropathic pain criteria; using NeupSIG grading, 96% of small fibre neuropathy participants met probable/definite criteria. Conclusion: Our study provides serological evidence of nerve pathology in fibromyalgia at comparable levels with small fibre neuropathy, although this did not correlate with neuropathic-like pain presence or severity. These findings highlight the need for subgroup-specific treatment strategies.