Wilkie, Diana J

Background: Understanding personal and geographic factors associated with smoking is important to design and implement interventions focused on reducing cancer health disparities. Scant research has been published recently regarding factors associated with smoking history associations within rural communities. Purpose: To examine demographic factors and rural residence history for associations with smoking history. Methodology: In a cross-sectional study of cancer-related behaviors, 1,786 adults (mean age 47.9 ± 17.5 years; 53% female, 84% White) completed an online survey in 2020. We examined factors associated with smoking history (having smoked at least 100 cigarettes) using independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. Results: Of the participants, 36% had a rural residence history and 49% had a smoking history. A larger proportion of men than women (61% vs. 37%; p < .001), White than Black participants (50% vs. 39%; p = .001), and rural than nonrural residents (53% vs. 46%; p = .005) had a smoking history. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the young age group (18–30) was less likely ( p = .002), whereas the middle age group (31–50) was more likely ( p < .001) to have a smoking history than those older than 50 years. Rural residence was associated with a smoking history among women ( p < .001), but not among men ( p = .70) in this sample. Conclusions: Tobacco control efforts are needed to focus on middle-aged men in general and women with rural residence history. Implications: Nurse practitioners are uniquely positioned to directly contribute to future research with self-identified rural populations that could help inform future public health policy.

The rise in prevalence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity indicates the need for more research examining associated risk factors. Identifying multilevel risk factors is especially critical for U.S. health disparity populations who have been shown to experience a disproportionate burden of chronic disease-related morbidity and mortality. This study examines differences in the prevalence of and risk factors associated with cardiometabolic multimorbidity status among health disparity populations in a representative sample of U.S. adults. Additionally, we investigate the role of perceived discrimination as a mediator of the relationship between rural identity and cardiometabolic multimorbidity status. We report the overall and stratified prevalence of cardiometabolic multimorbidity. Findings from multivariate logistic regression indicated that age, rural identity, healthcare access, and perceived discrimination were associated with higher odds of cardiometabolic multimorbidity. Perceived discrimination was found to be a significant mediator for the relationship between rural identity and cardiometabolic multimorbidity status. These findings have implications for the design and implementation of effective multilevel interventions to reduce the impact of perceived discrimination on cardiometabolic multimorbidity among rural adults.

Introduction The Florida-California Cancer Research, Education, and Engagement (CaRE 2 ) Health Equity Center is a triad partnership committed to increasing institutional capacity for cancer disparity research, the diversity of the cancer workforce, and community empowerment. This article provides an overview of the structure, process innovations, and initial outcomes from the first 4 years of the CaRE 2 triad partnership. Methods CaRE 2 serves diverse populations in Florida and California using a “molecule to the community and back” model. We prioritize research on the complex intersection of biological, environmental, and social determinants health, working together with scientific and health disparities communities, sharing expertise across institutions, bidirectional training, and community outreach. Partnership progress and outcomes were assessed using mixed methods and four Program Steering Committee meetings. Results Research capacity was increased through development of a Living Repository of 81 cancer model systems from minority patients for novel cancer drug development. CaRE 2 funded 15 scientific projects resulting in 38 publications. Workforce diversity entailed supporting 94 cancer trainees (92 URM) and 34 ESIs (32 URM) who coauthored 313 CaRE 2 -related publications and received 48 grants. Community empowerment was promoted via outreaching to more than 3000 individuals, training 145 community cancer advocates (including 28 Community Scientist Advocates), and publishing 10 community reports. CaRE 2 members and trainees together have published 639 articles, received 61 grants, and 57 awards. Conclusion The CaRE 2 partnership has achieved its initial aims. Infrastructure for translational cancer research was expanded at one partner institution, and cancer disparities research was expanded at the two cancer centers.