Daniel, Pavel

Abstract Objective Memory impairments are common in neurological disorders, especially drug‐resistant epilepsy, where cognitive deficits such as accelerated long‐term forgetting may occur before surgery due to interictal/ictal discharges, antiseizure medications, and disease progression. Postsurgical memory decline affects 40%–60% of patients. Understanding the neural mechanisms of memory encoding is essential for identifying critical network hubs and guiding surgical interventions that preserve cognitive function. Methods We analyzed intracranial electroencephalographic recordings from epilepsy patients ( n = 15) performing a verbal memory encoding task to identify key structures involved in successful memory formation. Functional connectivity was computed using multiple features across several frequency bands. Temporal dynamics of connectivity were examined to characterize pre‐encoding and encoding phases. Results The middle temporal gyrus (MTG) consistently emerged as a verbal memory hub across features and frequency bands. The inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) was identified as a beta‐band‐specific hub via phase synchrony. Temporal analyses revealed that MTG exhibited stable and widespread connectivity differences across all encoding phases, suggesting a role in pre‐encoding network priming. In contrast, IFG displayed a transient decrease in connectivity and spatial extent during early encoding, indicating a more focal and dynamic contribution. Significance These findings suggest that successful memory encoding relies on widespread, frequency‐specific connectivity patterns centered on MTG, complemented by transient, localized IFG activity. Identifying such hubs may inform surgical planning by highlighting regions critical for cognitive outcomes, ultimately supporting strategies to preserve memory in epilepsy surgery.

Abstract Precise localization of the epileptogenic zone is pivotal for planning minimally invasive surgeries in drug-resistant epilepsy. Here, we present a graph neural network (GNN) framework that integrates interictal intracranial EEG features, electrode topology, and MRI features to automate epilepsy surgery planning. We retrospectively evaluated the model using leave-one-patient-out cross-validation on a dataset of 80 drug-resistant epilepsy patients treated at St. Anne's University Hospital (Brno, Czech Republic), comprising 31 patients with good postsurgical outcomes (Engel I) and 49 with poor outcomes (Engel II–IV). The GNN predictions demonstrated a significantly better (P < 0.05, Mann–Whitney-U test) area under the precision-recall curve in patients with good outcomes (area under the precision-recall curve: 0.69) compared with those with poor outcomes (area under the precision-recall curve: 0.33), indicating that the model captures clinically relevant targets in successful cases. In patients with poor outcomes, the graph neural network proposed alternative intervention sites that diverged from the original clinical plans, highlighting its potential to identify alternative therapeutic targets. We show that topology-aware GNNs significantly outperformed (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) traditional neural networks while using the same intracranial EEG features, emphasizing the importance of incorporating implantation topology into predictive models. These findings uncover the potential of GNNs to automatically suggest targets for epilepsy surgery, which can assist the clinical team during the planning process.

ObjectiveIn the present study, we aimed to investigate depth electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings in a large cohort of patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy and to focus on interictal very high‐frequency oscillations (VHFOs) between 500Hz and 2kHz. We hypothesized that interictal VHFOs are more specific biomarkers for epileptogenic zone compared to traditional HFOs.MethodsForty patients with focal epilepsy who underwent presurgical stereo‐EEG (SEEG) were included in the study. SEEG data were recorded with a sampling rate of 25kHz, and a 30‐minute resting period was analyzed for each patient. Ten patients met selected criteria for analyses of correlations with surgical outcome: detection of interictal ripples (Rs), fast ripples (FRs), and VHFOs; resective surgery; and at least 1 year of postoperative follow‐up. Using power envelope computation and visual inspection of power distribution matrixes, electrode contacts with HFOs and VHFOs were detected and analyzed.ResultsInterictal very fast ripples (VFRs; 500–1,000Hz) were detected in 23 of 40 patients and ultrafast ripples (UFRs; 1,000–2,000Hz) in almost half of investigated subjects (n = 19). VFRs and UFRs were observed only in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy and were recorded exclusively from mesiotemporal structures. The UFRs were more spatially restricted in the brain than lower‐frequency HFOs. When compared to R oscillations, significantly better outcomes were observed in patients with a higher percentage of removed contacts containing FRs, VFRs, and UFRs.InterpretationInterictal VHFOs are relatively frequent abnormal phenomena in patients with epilepsy, and appear to be more specific biomarkers for epileptogenic zone when compared to traditional HFOs. Ann Neurol 2017;82:299–310