Stewart, Carli

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer. However, the durable response to this therapy remains low, and there is a risk of moderate-to-severe toxicities following treatment that requires close monitoring. Over the past decade, we have learned that cytokines play an important role in mediating CAR T cell–associated toxicities and efficacy. As such, cytokine modulation has become a popular area of investigation to improve therapeutic responses. Although the relationship of many cytokines with CAR T-cell therapy has been investigated, several recent studies suggest paradoxical roles for cytokines such as IFNγ, IL2, IL4, and IL10 in CAR T-cell response and toxicity. In this review, we summarize the history of these cytokines in immunotherapies, detail the contexts in which these cytokines have been beneficial or harmful in the context of CAR T-cell therapy, and discuss factors that may be dictating their pleiotropy.

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy has shown clinical successes in B cell hematological malignancies. Two B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CART cell therapies treating multiple myeloma (MM) were approved by FDA but most patients relapse within 1-2 years. Ex vivo-expanded antigen specific T cells as cancer treatment rely on TCR-mediated killing of tumors. We hypothesized that arming ex vivo enriched tumor-specific T cells with CARs targeting a different antigen improves T cell functions. First, we expanded mucin 1 (MUC1)-activated T cells from patients with MM through ex vivo stimulation by MUC1 peptides-loaded autologous PBMCs for 19 days. Then, we engineered MUC1-activated T cells with 4-1BB-co-stimulated BCMA CAR to generate MUC1 TCR+BCMA CAR+ T cells. Baseline T cells without MUC1 stimulation were engineered with BCMA CAR as control. Baseline T cells, MUC1 T cells, baseline BCMA CART cells, or MUC1 BCMA CART cells were cocultured with luc+ RPMI-8226, a MUC1+BCMA+ MM cell line, for 3 days. MUC1 BCMA CART cells showed stronger tumor killing than BCMA CART or MUC1 T cells in all 3 patients (p<0.0001). MUC1 BCMA CART showed improved proliferation than BCMA CART or MUC1 T cells (p=0.0765, p<0.0001, respectively) after a 5-day stimulation by RPMI-8226. To exclude possibility of metabolic alterations by 19-day PBMC incubation leading to better T cell functions in MUC1 BCMA CART, baseline and MUC1-stimulated T cells from 3 healthy donors were processed for the same assays. Day-19 BCMA CART cells showed inferior tumor killing compared to baseline BCMA CART in all 3 donors (p<0.0001). Lower T cell proliferation was also observed in day-19 BCMA CART (p=0.0838). Our data indicate that improved T cell functions in MUC1 BCMA CART were unlikely due to metabolic changes and required stimulation by tumor antigens prior to CAR engineering likely through MUC1 TCR. Additionally, MUC1 T cells, BCMA CART, or MUC1 BCMA CART cells from tested patients were stimulated by RPMI-8226 for bulk RNA sequencing. Both BCMA CART and MUC1 T cells had distinct transcriptomic features from MUC1 BCMA CART cells. Differential gene expression analysis showed upregulation of T cell function-associated genes (RYR2, ITGA1, GNLY, GZMA, etc.) in MUC1 BCMA CART vs BCMA CART. Enrichment of T cell function-associated pathways was also observed in MUC1 BCMA CART. Analysis between MUC1 T cell and MUC1 BCMA CART showed upregulation of T cell function-associated genes (CSF2, CRTAM, IFNG, GZMB, etc.) and enrichment of immune response pathways in MUC1 BCMA CART. Our findings suggest that equipping ex vivo-enriched tumor-specific T cells with CARs targeting a different antigen improves T cell functions in vitro. Importantly, this provides a rationale for a therapeutic regimen where patients receive ex vivo-enriched tumor-induced T cells followed by CAR engineering. Persistence of the engineered T cells is being investigated Citation Format: Kun Yun, R. Leo Sakemura, Ismail Can, Omar Gutierrez Ruiz, Ekene J. Ogbodo, Truc N. Huynh, Claudia Manriquez Roman, Olivia Sirpilla, Carli M. Stewart, Jennifer M. Feigin, Grace E. DeFranco, Sophia Y. Goldberg, Dominic A. Skeele, Mariam Stein, Dara Missan, Latha Pathangey, Long Mai, Hong Xia, Brooke Kimball, Lionel A. Kankeu Fonkoua, Mehrdad Hefazi, Michael W. Ruff, Elizabeth L. Siegler, Leif Bergsagel, Michael Gustafson, Sandra Gendler, Saad S. Kenderian. BCMA CAR engineering arms T cells with superior functions post ex vivo stimulation by MUC1 peptide-loaded autologous PBMCs [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 6103.

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy is an innovative form of immunotherapy that has shown remarkable and long-term responses in patients with B-cell malignancies. Over the years, the field has made significant progress in our understanding of the successes and challenges associated with CART cell therapy. In this review, we provide an overview of the current state of CART cell therapy in the clinic. We detail current challenges including patient access, CART-associated toxicity, tumor heterogeneity, CART cell trafficking, the tumor microenvironment, and different CART cell fates. With each challenge, we review lessons learned, potential solutions and outline areas for future development. Finally, we discuss how the field of engineered cell therapy is moving into the treatment of solid tumors and other diseases beyond cancer.

Despite the high initial responses to chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy, most patients relapse within the first 1-2 years. T cell quality influences the success of CART cell therapies greatly, and T cells from cancer patients are prone to transition into dysfunctional states, such as exhaustion or senescence. The role of exhaustion in CART cell failures has been studied extensively; however, the role of T cell senescence has remained mostly unexplored. In this study, we aimed to determine the development of CART cell senescence and its impact on CART therapeutic efficacy. First, we studied the development of CART cell senescence using an in vitro model to induce CART cell dysfunction. Here, we cyclically activated CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T (CART19) cells (either costimulated via 4-1BB (BBζ) or CD28 (28ζ)). Activation cycles are designed to mimic recurrent activation of CART cells to study the impact of T cell activation on CART cell fates throughout treatment. We added a rest time in between activation cycles to focus on senesced CART cell populations since, unlike exhaustion, senescence is irreversible even after rest. We examined CART immunophenotype, cell cycle regulators, transcriptomic profile, senescence marker gene expressions and T cell effector functions on days 0 (D0-T cell), 8 (D8-baseline CART), and 15 (D15-CART cell after one activation/rest cycles). Following an activation/rest cycle, T cell exhaustion markers CTLA4, LAG3, and PD1 returned to basal levels after an initial increase due to activation, while only TIM-3 levels remained elevated (BBζ: p=0.0090, 28ζ: p=0.0394). Increased TIM-3 expression is associated with T cell senescence, which prompted us to further investigate the development of a senescence phenotype. We found a prominent T cell senescence phenotype in BBζ compared to 28ζ, as evident by increased expression of p53 (BBζ: p=0.0248), p21 (BBζ: p=0.0483), CD27 (BBζ: p=0.0080), CD28 (BBζ: p=0.0327), uPAR (BBζ vs. 28ζ: p<0.0001), and KLRG1 (BBζ vs. 28ζ: p=0.0029) in recurrently activated-rested CART cells. Next, we evaluated the transcriptomic signature of recurrently activated-rested CART cells. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) indicated enrichment of gene sets related to senescent T cells as well as senMayo, a novel gene set which is reported to be selectively enriched in senescing cells or tissues, in BBζ, but not in 28ζ, compared to T cell D0 or in BBζ D15 compared to 28ζ D15 (p=0.00014 and p=0.089, respectively). MYC-related gene sets were found to be significantly enriched in recurrently activated/rested BBζ and depleted in 28ζ (p<0.1). MYC expression is increased in BBζ (p= 0.0010) while decreased in 28ζ (p=0.0036) upon recurrent activation and is higher in BBζ (D8: p=0.0018, D15: p= 0.0022) compared to 28ζ at indicated time points by qPCR. Given these results, we induced senescence in CART cells using two alternative strategies: MYC-T58A activation (oncogene-induced senescence) and irradiation. Senescence induced by MYC-T58A overexpression ameliorated only BBζ killing (p=0.0057), whereas senescence induced by irradiation improved 28ζ killing (p= 0.0086), indicating versatile impact of senescence on treatment outcome diverse CART cell therapies. Finally, analysis with two independent patient data sets correlated the emergence of senescence with contradicting clinical outcomes to BBζ and 28ζ treatments. The presence of senescent 28ζ cells in the peripheral blood of 28ζ-treated patients was reported to be associated with complete response in the clinic in an independent analysis. In another cohort, 28ζ-treated patients with higher senescence score were correlated with longer disease-free survival (p=0.0029), while senMayo gene set enrichment in BBζ-treated patients was associated with non-response in the clinic (p=0.014). In the same cohort, MYC-related gene sets-the same genes sets enriched in our recurrently activated/rested BBζ-are also enriched in nonresponsive BBζ-treated patients. In summary, our study indicates that (i) CART cells are susceptible to a state of senescence, as demonstrated using three independent approaches (repeated activation/rest, irradiation, and MYC modulation), (ii) CART senescence is more prominent in BBζ than 28ζ, and (iii) senescence is associated with worse outcomes following BBζ but not 28ζ treatment.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies. However, CAR T-cell therapy still has low durable response rates and common associated toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS). We recently reported that sequential therapy with the CD19 monoclonal antibody tafasitamab and CD19-directed CAR T (CART19, 41BBζ costimulated) cells significantly ameliorated CAR T-cell apoptosis and tumor cell pyroptosis, improving CAR T safety and efficacy (PMID: 37879074). Building on these findings, we hypothesized that controlling massive initial CAR T-cell stimulation by diminishing extensive tumor cell pyroptosis is critical to improve CAR T safety and durability. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated several caspase (Casp) inhibitors, including Casp1, Casp3, Casp7, and Casp11, in combination with CAR T cells. We found that the Casp1 inhibitor VX765 did not inhibit CAR T antigen-specific cytotoxicity and thus focused on VX765 in subsequent assays. We first assessed CAR T proliferation upon stimulation with the CD19+ JeKo-1 mantle cell lymphoma cell line in the presence of VX765. CAR T with vehicle control showed greater proliferation at day 3, but CAR T with VX765 showed higher proliferation at day 5 (p=0.03, absolute CD3+ counts by flow cytometry). We then co-cultured CAR T and JeKo-1 for 24 hours and observed a significant reduction in apoptotic CAR T (Annexin V+ and 7-AAD- via flow cytometry) in VX765-treated conditions (p=0.05). Additionally, there was significantly reduced pyroptosis (Annexin V+ 7-AAD+) (p=0.02) but higher apoptosis (Annexin V+ 7-AAD-) in JeKo-1 in VX765-treated conditions (p=0.04). VX765-treated CAR T showed higher Bcl2 expression via flow cytometry (p=0.03). We also studied tumor cell pyroptosis by measuring the level of HMGB-1. CART19, JeKo-1, and VX765 or vehicle control were co-cultured for 24 hours, and the level of HMGB-1 was found to be significantly reduced in VX765-treated conditions, indicating reduced tumor pyroptosis (p=0.006). We then assessed the impact of Casp1 inhibition in our in vitro model of CAR T exhaustion. We stimulated CAR T with CD19+ JeKo-1 every other day for 2 weeks and then assessed CCR7 and CD45RA expression on CAR T. VX765-treated CAR T showed higher central memory (p=0.08) and naïve (p=0.02) and lower terminally differentiated effector memory phenotypes (p=0.03). We next studied the effect of Casp1 inhibition with VX765 in vivo. To recapitulate CAR T-cell toxicities, including CRS, we utilized an immunocompetent mouse model. First, we generated murine CART19 (mCART19, CD28ζ costimulated) cells. Recipient mice were then engrafted with luciferase+ murine CD19+ TBL12 cells, a murine lymphoma cell line. Mice were treated 12 days later with cyclophosphamide (300 mg/kg, ip) and 24 hours after mice were imaged and randomized to receive 1 x 107, 1) untransduced T cell control (UTD), 2) mCART19 + vehicle control, or 3) mCART19 + VX765 (25 mg/kg). VX765 was given immediately before the CART19 injection and on day 2 post-CAR T injection. Mice were serially monitored and weighed to assess CAR T-cell toxicity. Tumor burden was assessed via weekly bioluminescent imaging. Mice treated with vehicle control showed a significant reduction in weight compared to the UTD control (p=0.02), while mice treated with VX765 maintained their weight and remained active without signs of CRS, including motor weakness and hunched body. UTD mice reached humane endpoints within 3 weeks after T-cell injection. Three satellite mice from each group were euthanized and spleens were harvested. Flow cytometric analysis showed a significant reduction in apoptotic CAR T (p=) and pyroptotic tumor cells in mice treated with VX765 (p=0.03). Western blot showed lower cleaved GSDME and GSDMD in mice treated with VX765. VX765-treated mice demonstrated prolonged CAR T persistence with durable anti-tumor activity. In summary, Casp1 inhibition with VX765 significantly reduced CAR T apoptosis, improved memory phenotype, and increased delayed CAR T proliferation. VX765 also reduced tumor cell pyroptosis and CRS incidence without impacting CAR T anti-tumor activity in vivo. Given the favorable preclinical outcomes and existing clinical data on VX765, this approach holds substantial translational potential for enhancing the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma.

Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), a CD28-costimulated CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) product, was FDA-approved in 2020 after demonstrating remarkable efficacy in the pivotal ZUMA-2 trial of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, despite the impressive initial activity of CART19 cell therapy in MCL, most patients relapse within the first 3 years following treatment. Myeloid cells, such as monocytes and macrophages, have been demonstrated to be major inhibitors of other immune cells, including T cells. Growing evidence shows that monocytes and macrophages contribute to CART cell failure, although the exact mechanisms are not fully understood. To better understand the mechanisms contributing to CART treatment resistance in MCL, we first utilized brexu-cel products from patients with MCL on the ZUMA-2 trial to uncover their transcriptomic features by single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) analysis. To understand if myeloid cells had negative impacts on clinical outcomes, we then analyzed autologous baseline peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples by scRNAseq. Our analyses of the brexu-cel samples revealed reduced response to IL-1β and its downstream signaling pathway as well as impaired T cell functions in non-responders. Transcriptomic analyses of the autologous baseline monocyte populations showed downregulation of IL-1β production and its associated pathways as well as upregulation of M2 phenotype-associated genes and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) in non-responder monocytes, implying a potential role of myeloid cells in CART resistance through impairment of IL-1 signaling in brexu-cel products. To validate our findings from the ZUMA-2 samples, we further studied the interactions between macrophages, MCL cells, and CART19 cells in preclinical models. First, CD28-costimulated CART19 cells generated from healthy donors were cocultured with JeKo-1, a CD19+ MCL cell line, and freshly isolated monocytes or ex vivo differentiated M2-like macrophages. M2-like macrophages were generated by incubating fresh monocytes with rhGM-CSF followed by coculturing with JeKo-1. CART19 antigen-specific proliferation was significantly inhibited by M2-like macrophages but not fresh monocytes (JeKo-1+CART19 vs JeKo-1+M2+CART19, p=0.00503). Transwell assays indicated that suppression by M2-like macrophages was contact-independent. Cytokine profile analysis of coculture supernatants showed significant elevation of IL-1ra in M2-like macrophage cocultures (JeKo-1+Mono+CART19 vs JeKo-1+M2+CART19, p=0.0292). This led us to hypothesize that M2-like macrophages inhibit CART19 by secreting IL-1ra to block IL-1 signaling in CART19. To test this hypothesis, we interrogated the role of IL-1ra in CART19. CART19 + JeKo-1 cocultures were supplemented with IL-1β + IL-1ra or IL-1β + IL-1ra + IL-1ra neutralizing antibody (neuAb). CART19 proliferation was improved by IL-1β (vehicle control vs IL-1β, p<0.0001). IL-1ra inhibited IL-1β-dependent CART19 proliferation (IL-1β vs IL-1β+IL1ra, p=0.0006), which was restored by IL-1ra neutralization (IL-1β+IL-1ra vs IL-1β+IL-1ra+IL-1ra neuAb, p=0.0215). Next, we assessed the impact of IL-1ra on CART functions in mouse MCL xenografts in the presence of M2-like macrophages. NOD-SCID-γ-/- (NSG) mice were subcutaneously injected with 0.5 million of human macrophages and 1 million of luciferase+ JeKo-1. Mice were then randomized once tumor engraftment was confirmed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI), followed by treatment with 2 million CART19 with 10 mg/kg IL-1ra neuAb or control IgG for 3 weeks. Combination of CART19 cells and IL-1ra neuAb led to improved antitumor activity based on BLI measurements compared to control IgG (IL-1ra neuAb vs control IgG, p=0.0058). Additionally, expression of IL-1RI, receptor of IL-1β and IL-1ra, was measured on T cells after coculturing CART19, JeKo-1, and M2-like macrophages. M2-like macrophages downregulated IL-1RI expression on CART cells, which might potentially desensitize CART response to IL-1β, resulting in further suppression in CART proliferation (JeKo-1+M2+CART19 vs JeKo-1+CART19, p=0.001). Overall, our study elucidates a potential mechanism of IL-1 pathway modulation mediated by myeloid cells in contributing to CART19 failure in MCL.

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T (CART19) cell therapy has shown outstanding clinical success. However, patients can develop CART-induced toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity. Studies have found that activation of myeloid cells by granulocyte monocyte-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can contribute to toxicity development. GM-CSF depletion leads to reduced myeloid activation, prevention of CART-induced toxicities, and improved CART efficacy. CART cells upregulate cytokine receptors upon activation, and our results indicate that CART19 cells significantly upregulate GMCSFR upon antigen-specific stimulation (<10% vs >30%, p<0.01). This led us to hypothesize that GMCSFR signaling contributes to CART cell activity. To understand the role of GM-CSFR upregulation on CART cell functions, we compared the impacts of neutralizing GM-CSF or blocking GM-CSF receptor alpha (GM-CSFRα) on CART19. First, 4-1BB-costimulated CART19 cells generated from healthy donors were stimulated with CD3/CD28 beads at a 1:3 ratio for 6 days. CART cells were maintained at 1 x 106/mL throughout the culture and supplemented with IgG isotype control, GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, or GM-CSFRα blockade at 10 μg/mL, 20 μg/mL, or 100 μg/mL. On day 6, cells were debeaded and rested for 2 days. Then, CART cells were cocultured with NALM6, a CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line, at a ratio of 1:1 for 3 days. The cocultures were supplemented with the same doses of antibodies listed above. Antigen-specific proliferation of CART cells was measured by flow cytometry. Our data suggested that CART19 proliferated is not impacted by GM-CSF neutralization but is inhibited by GM-CSFRα blockade (IgG isotype vs 10 μg/mL GM-CSFRα blockade, p<0.0001; IgG isotype vs 20 μg/mL GM-CSFRα blockade, p<0.0001; IgG isotype vs 100 μg/mL GM-CSFRα blockade, p=0.009). CART cells were assessed in a cytotoxicity assay with NALM6 luciferase+ cells as well, which did not show significant impacts from GM-CSF neutralization or GM-CSFRα blockade. To evaluate the impacts of GM-CSF neutralization and GM-CSFRα blockade in a mouse model, we engrafted NSG mice with 1 million NALM6 luciferase+ cells intravenously. Mice were then treated with 1.4 million CART19 plus 10 mg/kg IgG isotype control, GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, or GM-CSFRα blockade intraperitoneally. GM-CSFRα blockade drastically suppressed antitumor activities of CART (CART19+GM-CSFRα blockade vs CART19+IgG isotype control, p<0.0001; CART19+GM-CSFRα blockade vs CART19+GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, p<0.0001; CART19+ GM-CSFRα blockade vs untransduced T cell, n.s.). Serum cytokines were analyzed 2 days after CART treatment, showing that mice with GM-CSFRα blockade had significantly lower levels of human IFNγ (p=0.0189) and IL-2 (p=0.0121) compared to IgG isotype control group, while GM-CSF neutralization did not show significant impacts. Mice treated with CART plus IgG isotype control or GM-CSF neutralizing antibody showed prolonged survival compared to mice treated with GM-CSFRα blockade or untransduced T cells (p=0.0285). To unravel the mechanisms behind functional differences between GM-CSFRα blockade and GM-CSF neutralization, CART cells (n = 3 biological replicates) were cocultured with NALM6 at a 1:1 ratio supplemented with 10 μg/mL GM-CSF neutralizing antibody, GM-CSFRα blockade, or IgG isotype control overnight, followed by T cell isolation, bulk RNA isolation, and RNA sequencing (RNAseq) analysis. Our RNAseq data indicated significant upregulation (Log2FC>0.5, padj. <0.05) of T cell exhaustion- and dysfunction-associated genes (RGS16, PDCD1, CTLA4, NR4A3, CD101, LAG3) as well as negative regulators of T cell functions (G0S2, PIK3IP1, LGALS3) in the GM-CSFRα blockade group compared to GM-CSF neutralizing antibody or IgG isotype control groups. T cell activation-associated pathways were enriched in the GM-CSFRα blockade group. Overall, our data show that GM-CSFRα blockade impacts CART functions differently from GM-CSF neutralization. Specifically, GM-CSFRα blockade inhibits CART proliferation in vitro and antitumor activity in vivo. Interestingly, GM-CSFRα blockade leads to enrichment of T cell exhaustion- and dysfunction-associated genes in CART19, which is worth further investigation. These findings may be applicable to other cytokine receptors upregulated on activated CART cells.

Abstract While chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy has shown remarkable success, the development of exhaustion limits durable response. We identified a role for interleukin (IL)-4 in the development of CART cell exhaustion through three independent approaches including: 1) a genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen using healthy donor CART cells in an in vitro model for exhaustion, 2) RNA and ATAC sequencing on freshly produced and chronically stimulated healthy donor CART cells, and 3) RNA and ATAC sequencing on pre-infusion CART cell products from responders and non-responders in the Zuma-1 clinical trial that led to the FDA approval of axi-cel. Further, in vitro validation studies revealed that CD19 directed CART (CART19) cells chronically stimulated in the presence of human recombinant IL-4 (hrIL-4) displayed signs of exhaustion such as 1) decreased proliferation (p = 0.01), 2) increased coexpression of inhibitory receptors (p = 0.01), and 3) decreased production of IL-2 and interferon (IFN)-γ (p= 0.02, p = 0.002). Encouragingly, CART19 cells combined with an IL-4 monoclonal antibody improved antitumor activity (p = 0.045) and expansion (p = 0.01) while also decreasing the co-expression of inhibitory receptors (p = 0.02) in a mantle cell lymphoma xenograft mouse model. Building on these results, we asked if IL-4 driven exhaustion results from a direct impact of IL-4 on CART cells. To test this, we used a tumor-free assay where CART19 cells were chronically stimulated with CD19 beads in the presence of hrIL-4 or diluent. CART cells treated with hrIL-4 displayed an exhausted phenotype characterized by increased co-expression of inhibitory receptors (p = 0.04) and decreased production of IL-2 (p = 0.01). Next, we asked if IL-4 driven CART cell exhaustion is dependent on the costimulatory domain. We tested the impact of IL-4 on both CD28ζ and 41BBζ costimulated CART19 cells. Similar to our previous studies with CART19-28ζ cells, chronic stimulation of CART19-BBζ cells in the presence of hrIL-4 enhanced the exhausted phenotype as seen by increased co-expression of inhibitory receptors (p = 0.04) and decreased production of IL-2 and IFN-γ (p = 0.08 and p = 0.007). Finally, we asked if IL-4 induces exhaustion independently of its classic role in Th2 polarization of CD4 CART cells. Following CART production, we isolated CD8 cells and chronically stimulated them in the presence of hrIL-4 or diluent. CD8 CART cells treated with hrIL-4 displayed an enhanced exhausted profile as seen by 1) decreased proliferative ability (p < 0.0001), 2) increased co-expression of inhibitory receptors (p = 0.01), and 3) decreased production of IL-2 and IFN-γ (p < 0.0001, p = 0.004). Together, our data indicates a novel role for IL-4 in the development of CART cell exhaustion that is independent of tumor cells, costimulatory domain, and CD4 cells. As such, we believe IL-4 neutralization may be a widely applicable and actionable approach to improve the durable response to CART cell therapy. Citation Format: Carli M. Stewart, Elizabeth L. Siegler, Truc N. Huynh, R. Leo Sakemura, Brooke Kimball, Long Mai, Kun Yun, James H. Girsch, Jennifer Feigin, Omar Gutierrez Ruiz, Makena Rodriguez, Ekene Ogbodo, Ismail Can, Claudia Manriquez Roman, Olivia Sirpilla, Hong Xia, Jenny Kim, Justin Budka, Mike Mattie, Nathalie Scholler, Simone Filosto, Saad S. Kenderian. IL-4 drives CART cell exhaustion in a CD4 independent manner [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 37.