Reymond, Philippe

Background The management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) requires a balance between procedural risks and the potential benefit of rupture prevention. Objective The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and anatomical results of endovascular treatment for UIAs at our institution, to benchmark our practice and potential areas for improvement, and enable transparent communication with patients by providing accurate, evidence-based information. Methods We reviewed all patients treated for an UIA between January 2017 and July 2022. Patients were grouped according to treatment technique: simple or balloon-assisted coiling; stent-assisted coiling; or flow-diverter stent placement. Clinical outcomes included perioperative mortality, transient (<3 months), and permanent morbidity (>3 months). Anatomical results were graded with the Raymond-Roy or the O’Kelly-Marotta scales. Retreatment rates, length of hospitalization, readmissions, irradiation time, and total radiation dose were assessed. Results In total, 169 patients with 201 UIAs underwent 187 endovascular procedures without death, 1% permanent morbidity, 8% transient morbidity, and 4% retreatment. The treatment subgroups analysis shows an absence of permanent morbidity associated with flow-diverter stenting and stent-assisted coiling. Simple/balloon-assisted coiling suffered 2.6% permanent morbidity. Transient morbidity was observed in 9%, 9.5%, and 6.6% of flow-diverter stenting, stent-assisted coiling, and simple/balloon-assisted coiling, respectively. Conclusions In our hospital, about one in a hundred procedures caused lasting problems, while about one in 25 aneurysms needed a second treatment. These results reflect our case selection and multidisciplinary approach. Reporting them transparently helps patients understand what outcomes to expect at our hospital.

Background and Purpose Thrombectomy in distal, medium vessels is a topic of increasing interest. To date, there are few in vitro studies focused on performance of ≤5F catheters in medium vessels. The purpose of this study is to compare the performance of the 3F, 4F, and 5F MIVI Neuroscience Q Catheters versus Penumbra 3F, 4F, and MicroVention Sofia 5F Catheters. Methods Using in vitro methods, we assessed and compared the following parameters: aspiration flow rates, clot uncorking forces, impulse, and clot ingestion. For flow rate, each aspiration catheter was immersed in a cylindrical container. Flow rate at one second was used to calculate impulse. For clot uncorking force, the force required to disengage a catheter from a simulated clot was recorded. For ingestion, we measured time to ingest soft and medium stiffness synthetic clots. Results The measured flow rates without a stent retriever for the Q3, Q4, and Q5 catheters were 3.54 ml/s, 5.32 ml/s, and 6.87 ml/s. The measured flow rates without a stent retriever for the 3MAX, 4MAX, and 5F Sofia were 1.46 ml/s, 2.56 ml/s, and 1.73 ml/s. The impulse calculated for one second was 26 mNs for Q5 vs 9 mNs for Sofia 5, 35 mNs for Q4 vs 15 mNs for 4Max< and 35 mNs for Q3 vs 9 mNs for 3Max. The average system ingestion for Q was significantly faster than the competitive catheters. Conclusions The Q catheters demonstrated higher flow rates, higher uncorking force, and faster complete clot ingestion than competitive catheters.