Back to Authors

Navarro-Garcia de Llano, Juan P

0000-0002-0586-580X

Mayo Clinic

Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.

Citations 2

Robotic-Assisted Single-Position Lateral Mini-Open Upper Lumbar Corpectomy with Posterior Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Technical Note with Illustrative Case Series
Iyer, Harshvardhan , Llano, Juan P. Navarro-Garcia de, Wang, Eric, Johnson, Walter R., Sastry, Rahul A. , Ramos, Rafael de La Garza, Sampath, Prakash , Gokaslan, Ziya L., Oyelese, Adetokunbo A. , Ramos, Rafael De la Garza , Llano, Juan P Navarro-Garcia de , De la Garza Ramos, Rafael , Navarro-Garcia de Llano, Juan P , Iyer, Harshvardhan G , Wang, Elaina J., Gokaslan, Ziya L., Akinduro, Oluwaseun O.

Applied Sciences | April 6, 2026 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 3501

10.3390/app16073501 Get It

Management of unstable upper lumbar fractures with corpectomy and posterior fixation is technically demanding, and conventional workflows may require intraoperative repositioning, increasing operative complexity. Lateral mini-open upper lumbar corpectomy (LMULC) paired with robotic-assisted (RA) posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPPSF) can be performed in a single position to facilitate ventral spinal decompression and stabilization in the anatomically constrained upper lumbar spine. In this study, we describe the operative technique and report four illustrative cases of unstable L1 or L2 fractures treated with single-position LMULC, RA-PPPSF, and short-segment fusion. Clinical, radiological, intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. The mean age was 52.3 ± 17.7 years. The median operation time was 314 min (range 268–361 min); the median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 225 mL (range 100–400 mL). The median preoperative kyphosis was 10.15° (range 8.4–14.6°), the median postoperative kyphosis measured 6.65° (range 1.7–10.8°) and the median correction achieved was 3.5° (range −2.4–12.9°). The median visual analog scale (VAS) pain score reduced from 7 (range 7–9) preoperatively to 4.5 (range 2–6) postoperatively at discharge. At a median follow-up of 12 months (range 6–15 months), all patients had uncomplicated recoveries, demonstrated solid fusion on imaging, and reported favorable MacNab outcomes. Single-position LMULC with RA-PPPSF was technically feasible in this preliminary illustrative series and resulted in favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes. However, further studies in larger cohorts are warranted to help confirm these findings and better define the potential advantages and limitations of this technique.
Comparative Outcomes of Brachyury Vaccine vs. Imatinib in Advanced Chordoma: A Mayo Clinic Experience
Llano, Juan P Navarro-Garcia de , Iyer, Harshvardhan , Hoffman, Holly , Seetharam, ­Mahesh , Attia, Steven , Navarro-Garcia de Llano, Juan P , Iyer, Harshvardhan G , Hoffman, Harry C , Akinduro, Oluwaseun O.

Cancers | October 31, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 3493

10.3390/cancers17213493 Get It

Background/Objectives: Chordoma, a rare slow-growing malignant bone tumor, remains therapeutically challenging due to its invasive nature. We examined institutional outcomes comparing imatinib and brachyury-directed vaccines. Methods: We used data from three sites of our quaternary care academic institution to analyze demographics, time to progression, overall survival, and adverse events in chordoma patients treated with imatinib or enrolled in a brachyury vaccine trial. Results: We included a total of 52 patients (8 in the brachyury vaccine cohort and 44 in the imatinib cohort) in the analysis. As expected, sacrococcygeal location was the most predominant in both cohorts: 62.5% in the brachyury cohort and 45.5% in the imatinib cohort. No demographic differences were present between the cohorts. ECOG was similar in both groups (p = 0.796). The primary outcome, time to progression (TTP), was shorter in the brachyury compared to the imatinib cohort (5.6 vs. 13 months, p = 0.0589), almost reaching statistical significance. Overall survival (OS) was comparable, 211 vs. 212 months for the brachyury and imatinib cohorts, respectively (p = 0.277). Although the brachyury vaccine cohort presented a higher incidence of adverse events than the imatinib cohort (75% vs. 31.8%, p = 0.021), the severity was milder. Conclusions: Imatinib showed longer disease control than the brachyury vaccine, though overall survival was similar. Future studies and deeper molecular insights are essential to develop better therapies and improve patient quality of life.