D’Haens, Geert

Abstract Background Endoscopic healing has become a critical treatment target in Crohn’s disease (CD). Risankizumab (RZB), a humanized immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody against the p19 subunit of interleukin 23, is being investigated as a treatment for moderate-to-severe CD. This analysis assessed different endoscopic endpoints in patients treated with RZB induction therapy in two double-blind, randomised, placebo (PBO)-controlled studies (ADVANCE [NCT03104413] and MOTIVATE [NCT03105128]). Methods Patients with moderate-to-severe CD (CD Activity Index [CDAI] of 220–450, Simple Endoscopic Score for CD [SES-CD] ≥ 6 [≥ 4 for isolated ileal disease] excluding the narrowing component, and average daily [liquid/very soft] stool frequency [SF] ≥ 4 and/or average daily abdominal pain [AP] score ≥ 2) who had demonstrated prior inadequate response or intolerance to conventional and/or biologic treatment (ADVANCE) or to biologic treatment (MOTIVATE) were randomised 2:2:1 (ADVANCE) or 1:1:1 (MOTIVATE) to receive intravenous (IV) RZB 600 mg, RZB 1200 mg, or PBO at weeks 0, 4, and 8. This analysis evaluated the proportion of patients who achieved endoscopic remission ulcer-free endoscopy (ie, absence of ulcers), and composite endpoints of CDAI clinical response and endoscopic response, and enhanced clinical response and endoscopic response at week 12 (endpoints defined in Figure 1 footnotes). All endoscopies were centrally read by a blinded reviewer. Safety was assessed throughout the studies. Results In ADVANCE and MOTIVATE, 850 and 569 patients, respectively, were randomised and included in the intent-to-treat population for this analysis. At week 12 greater proportions of RZB- vs PBO-treated patients in both studies achieved endoscopic remission (P ≤ .001), ulcer-free endoscopy (P ≤ .01), CDAI clinical response and endoscopic response (P ≤ .001), and enhanced clinical response and endoscopic response (P ≤ .001; Figure 1). Treatment with RZB 600 mg or 1200 mg was well tolerated, and no new safety risks were identified.1,2 Conclusion Induction therapy with IV RZB 600 mg or 1200 mg resulted in improved outcomes at week 12 compared with PBO as assessed by endoscopy and by composite endoscopic-clinical endpoints in patients with moderate-to-severe CD. References

INTRODUCTION: We applied the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework to evaluate the performance of fecal calprotectin (FC) as an alternative to endoscopy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with a biologic agent or tofacitinib. METHODS: Individual participant data from the trials of infliximab, golimumab, vedolizumab, and tofacitinib for UC were pooled to generate prevalence of endoscopic activity (Mayo endoscopy score) across different combinations of the rectal bleeding score (RBS) and stool frequency score (SFS). These estimates were then combined with the data from an updated systematic review of the operating properties of FC to generate clinical scenario–specific assessments of the performance of FC as a predictor of endoscopic disease activity. A prespecified threshold of acceptability for false-negative (FN) and false-positive (FP) test results was set at 5%. RESULTS: For patients with UC achieving RBS 0 + SFS 0/1, FC ≤ 50 μg/g may avoid endoscopy in 50% patients with a FN rate <5%. Similarly, for patients with RBS 2/3 + SFS 2/3, FC ≥ 250 μg/g potentially avoids endoscopy in approximately 50% patients with an FP rate <5%. The greatest uncertainty in the diagnostic performance for FC was observed in patients with UC achieving RBS 0 but having SFS 2/3, where FN and FP rates were consistently >10%, and endoscopic evaluation may be warranted. DISCUSSION: Two clinical scenarios were identified where FC can be used with confidence for monitoring treatment response to biologics or tofacitinib in patients with UC without the requirement for endoscopy.

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective, humanised, monoclonal α 4β 7 integrin antibody for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD). VDZ is currently an intravenous (IV) therapy; a subcutaneous (SC) formulation is under development to provide patients with an alternative route of administration for maintenance treatment for UC and CD. Here we present the first data from the phase 3 study of VDZ SC maintenance treatment in CD. Methods VISIBLE 2 (NCT02611817; EudraCT 2015-000481-58) was a randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 trial of VDZ SC as maintenance treatment in adults with moderately to severely active CD. Patients (n = 644) received open-label VDZ 300mg IV induction therapy at Weeks 0 and 2. At Week 6, clinical responders (defined as patients with a ≥70-point decrease in CD Activity Index [CDAI] from baseline) were randomly assigned to receive vedolizumab SC (108 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W]), or placebo (Q2W) for up to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical remission at Week 52 (defined as CDAI score ≤150). Rank-ordered secondary endpoints were enhanced clinical response at Week 52 (a drop of ≥100 in CDAI score), corticosteroid (CS)-free clinical remission at Week 52, and clinical remission at Week 52 in anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-naïve patients. Finally, VDZ immunogenicity and predefined adverse events of special interest were assessed. Results Patients who responded to VDZ IV induction at Week 6 (n = 409) were randomised to VDZ SC (n = 275) or PBO (n = 134) maintenance and received at least 1 dose of study drug; 61% and 53%, respectively, were previously exposed to anti-TNF therapy. At Week 52, 48.0% of patients on VDZ SC vs. 34.3% on PBO were in clinical remission (p = 0.008, Figure). Enhanced clinical response at Week 52 was reached by 52.0% vs. 44.8% of patients on VDZ SC vs. PBO, respectively (p = 0.167). Among patients on concomitant CS at baseline (VDZ SC, n = 95; PBO, n = 44), 45.3% receiving VDZ SC vs. 18.2% receiving PBO achieved CS-free clinical remission at Week 52. Of anti-TNF-naïve patients (VDZ SC, n = 107; PBO, n = 63), 48.6% vs. 42.9% were in clinical remission at Week 52 in the VDZ SC and PBO arms, respectively. Injection-site reactions were reported for &lt;3% of patients treated with VDZ SC. Serious infections, malignancy, and liver injury were ≤5% for both arms. Anti-VDZ antibodies were detected in 7 (2.5%) patients treated with VDZ SC arm; 4 of 7 patients developed neutralising antibodies. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion Among VDZ IV induction responders, significantly more patients on maintenance VDZ SC than PBO achieved clinical remission at Week 52. The safety findings with VDZ SC remain in line with the known safety profile of VDZ IV in patients with CD.

Abstract Background Adalimumab (ADA) is efficacious and well tolerated in adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).1,2 SERENE-UC (NCT02065622) is a study evaluating higher ADA dosing regimens from which induction study results have previously been reported3; here, we report data from the maintenance study. Methods This Phase 3, double-blind, randomised, multicentre study evaluated higher vs. standard ADA dosing regimens for induction and maintenance therapy in adult patients with moderately to severely active UC. Following completion of the induction study at Week 8, all patients were re-randomised 2:2:1 to ADA 40 mg every week (40 EW), ADA 40 mg every other week (40 EOW), or exploratory ADA 40 mg with therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) regimens, stratified by induction treatment regimen, clinical response status at Week 8, and clinical remission (CRem) status at Week 8 among Week 8 responders. Efficacy endpoints were evaluated in Week 8 responders (ITT-RP) unless indicated differently. The primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients achieving CRem (full Mayo Score ≤2 with no subscore &gt;1) at Week 52. The endoscopic component of the Mayo Score was scored via central reading. Non-responder imputation was used for missing values. Comparisons between 40 EW and 40 EOW dosing regimens used the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test adjusted for stratification. Safety assessment included a collection of adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and laboratory data. Results Of 852 patients in the Global (ex-Japan) induction study, 757 were re-randomised at Week 8 and 371 were included in the ITT-RP. In the ITT-RP, induction baseline demographics and disease characteristics were generally balanced across the 3 treatment arms; range across arms for mean UC disease duration was 6.2–7.8 years, 6.8–11.7% had prior infliximab use, and 62.5–63.5% were receiving corticosteroids. The overall mean ADA exposure was 252.2 days. The table displays results for efficacy endpoints. The observed safety profile was similar between maintenance treatment arms, including AEs of special interest (generally &lt;1% across arms). Conclusion In the Global (ex-Japan) study of SERENE-UC, CRem at Week 52 was numerically higher among Week 8 responders in patients receiving ADA 40 EW compared with 40 EOW maintenance regimens (∆ = 10.5%), but not statistically significant. Higher maintenance treatment with 40 EW was generally safe and well tolerated with a similar safety profile to 40 EOW. No new long-term safety concerns were observed. References

Abstract Background Anaemia is a frequent complication in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC), and patients who respond to treatment generally show improvement in anaemia. Decrease in haemoglobin (Hgb) levels and anaemia may be associated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK1 selective inhibitor, has demonstrated favourable dose-dependent efficacy in patients with moderately to severely active UC.1 This analysis of data from the U-ACHIEVE study addressed effects of UPA treatment on Hgb levels in patients with UC. Methods U-ACHIEVE (NCT02819635) was a randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 2b clinical trial. Adults with moderately to severely active UC were randomised to receive 7.5, 15, 30, or 45 mg UPA or PBO once daily (QD) for 8 weeks. Hgb levels were measured for all groups at baseline (BL) and weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. Mean change from BL was calculated for each group. p-values for comparison between UPA and PBO groups were calculated using one-way ANOVA; no multiplicity adjustment was applied. Percentage of patients with Hgb values grade 2 (15–20 g/l Hgb decrease from BL), grade 3 (&lt;80 g/l Hgb level or 21–29 g/l Hgb decrease from BL), and grade 4 (&lt;70 g/l Hgb level or &gt;29 g/l Hgb decrease BL) anaemia were determined for all treatment groups using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5. Adverse events (AE) were reported by investigators. Results Included in the analysis were 250 patients (mean age ± SD, 42.3 ± 14.2 years; disease duration, 8.2 ± 2.5 years). At BL, most treatment groups had similar mean Hgb levels, except for the 15 mg UPA group, which had significantly lower Hgb levels vs. PBO group (Table). Increased or stable mean levels of Hgb at week 8 vs. BL were observed in most UPA treatment groups. The PBO group had the greatest decrease in Hgb vs. BL at week 8 compared with UPA treatment groups (Figure). Grade ≥2 anaemia was reported in 17.4% of patients receiving PBO and 14.4% of all patients receiving UPA (14.9%, 12.2%, 12.0%, and 17.9% of patients receiving 7.5, 15, 30, and 45 mg UPA, respectively). Grade ≥3 anaemia was reported in 8.7% of patients receiving PBO and 5% of all patients receiving UPA (6.4%, 6.1%, 6.0%, and 1.8% of patients receiving 7.5, 15, 30, and 45 mg UPA, respectively). One subject receiving 7.5 mg QD UPA had grade 4 anaemia. AE of anaemia was reported in 6.5% of patients receiving PBO and in 2.1%, 8.2%, and 3.8% of patients receiving 7.5, 15, and 30 mg UPA, respectively, but not in the 45 mg UPA group. Conclusion Decreased Hgb levels over time were observed more frequently in the PBO group. The maintenance of Hgb levels in patients receiving UPA was likely because of improvement of underlying UC. Reference

INTRODUCTION: An unmet need exists to find effective therapy in more severe ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, especially those who have failed multiple therapies. The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib, a selective Janus Kinase 1 inhibitor, has been assessed in an 8-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 2b induction study in adult patients with moderately-to-severely active UC (U-ACHIEVE). 1,2 METHODS: In U-ACHIEVE, adult patients with moderately-to-severely active UC as determined by the Adapted Mayo Score (5-9 points and centrally-read endoscopy subscore 2-3) were randomized to receive extended-release upadacitinib 7.5, 15, 30, 45 mg once daily (QD) or placebo for 8 weeks. In the current sub-analysis, the efficacy of upadacitinib in more severe and/or more refractory patient populations was assessed. Patients who at baseline had failed ≥2 prior biologic agents, had pancolitis, and/or an Adapted Mayo score >7, were included. Pairwise comparisons between upadacitinib doses and placebo for the primary endpoint, clinical remission per Adapted Mayo Score at Week 8 (defined as stool frequency subscore ≤1, rectal bleeding subscore = 0, and endoscopic subscore ≤1) and secondary endpoints were conducted using the Fisher's Exact test and no multiplicity adjustments were applied. Non-responder imputation was utilized for missing values. RESULTS: At baseline, 142 (56.8% of the total study population) patients had failed ≥2 prior biologics, 135 (54.0%) patients had pancolitis, and 90 (36.0%) patients had an Adapted Mayo score >7. The proportions of patients achieving endoscopic improvement, clinical response per Adapted Mayo score, and clinical response per Partial Mayo score were significantly higher (nominal P -value < 0.05) with upadacitinib doses ≥30 mg QD versus the placebo group in patients who failed ≥2 biologics or had pancolitis at baseline (Table 1). Trends of higher proportions of patients achieving clinical remission per Adapted Mayo score, endoscopic improvement, clinical response per Adapted Mayo score, and clinical response per Partial Mayo score were observed with all upadacitinib groups versus placebo in all the sub-analyses. CONCLUSION: In this dose-ranging induction study, upadacitinib demonstrated greater efficacy compared to placebo with dose response in the more severe and refractory population; significantly greater efficacy was demonstrated with upadacitinib at doses ≥30 mg QD for most of the endpoints evaluated.