Platelet calcium appears to be essential in platelet activation. Accordingly, Verapamil (a channel calcium blocker) was tested “in vivo” as a possible platelet inhibitor agent. Fifteen dogs underwent bilateral femoral artery grafting with one polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) and one autologous vein graft. Peroperatively, five dogs were infused continuously with Verapamil (6 μgs/kg/min) and 9 dogs were left untreated and the arterial prostheses were surgically implanted. Using autologous Indium-111-labeled platelets injected 24 hours prior to surgery as a platelet marker, grafts were removed 1 hour following resumption of blood flow. Radioactivity per unit weight of Gore-Tex, vein and blood were determined with a gamma counter and the relative radioactivity with respect to the internal reference standard of blood is tabulated belowVerapamil-treated dogs showed a significant reduction in the “in vivo” platelet deposition on Gore-Tex and autologous venous grafts. Preliminary data indicates that “in vitro” platelet aggregation with soluble calf skin collagen (515 μg/ml) and ADP (2-100 μm) is not different between control and drug-treated dogs.Calcium channel blockers may be promising “in vivo” platelet inhibitor agents; in addition, they may provide further understanding of the different processes involved in “in vivo” and “in vitro” platelet activation.
Hemodynamic and Symptomatic Consequences of Ventricular Pacing*
NISHIMURA, R.A. et al.: Hemodynamic and symptomatic consequences of ventricular pacing. After implantation of a ventricular demand pacemaker (VVI), occasional patients continue to have dizziness, syncope, or near syncope (“pacemaker syndrome”). To identify patients in whom VVI pacing may have deleterious effects, we compared cuff blood pressure responses to VVI pacing with blood pressure responses to atrioventricsler sequential pacing (DVI) or sinus rhythm in 50 consecutive patients. Patients with intact ventriculoatrial conduction had a much greater decrease in systolic blood pressure with VVI pacing (24 ± 11 mm Hg) than those with ventriculoatrial dissociation (−4 ± 15 mm Hg) (P<0.005). Patients who were in heart failure had a lesser decrease in blood pressure with VVI pacing than did those without failure (P<0.05); 13 of the 14 heart failure patients lacked ventriculoatrial conduction. Ten patients had symptomatic dizziness after VVI pacing; the incidence of symptoms was higher in patients with ventriculoatrial conduction (9 of 23) than in those without ventriculoatrial conduction (1 of 27) (P<0.003). We conclude that the presence of intact ventriculoatrial conduction appears to be a crucial determinent of the hemodynamic response to VVI pacing, and its presence may identify patients who are at risk for “pacemaker syndrome.”
Thyroxine Therapy in Hypothyroid Patients Undergoing Coronary Revascularization: A Retrospective Analysis