Back to Authors

Keefe, Sarah

0000-0002-5943-0940

Mayo Clinic

Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Citations 1

Cross‐Sectional FDG in Down Syndrome and Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer's Disease
Abdelmoity, Omar , Wisch, Julie K. , Kennedy, James T. , Vlassenko, Andrei G. , Handen, Benjamin L. , Head, Elizabeth , Lai, Florence , Rosas, H. Diana , Hartley, Sigan L. , Tudorascu, Dana , Keefe, Sarah , Ikeuchi, Takeshi, Morris, John C., Roh, Jee Hoon , Day, Gregory S. , Xiong, Chengjie , Head, Elizabeth , Lao, Patrick , Keefe, Sarah , Roh, Jee Hoon , Day, Gregory S , Gordon, Brian A , Xiong, Chengjie , Wisch, Julie K , Goyal, Manu S. , Flores, Shaney , Keator, David B. , Rafii, Michael S. , Zaman, Shahid H. , Brickman, Adam M. , Lee, Joseph H. , Allegri, Ricardo , Fougère, Christian la , Llibre‐Guerra, Jorge J. , Ikeuchi, Takeshi , Morris, John C. , Schofield, Peter R. , Gordon, Brian A. , Benzinger, Tammie L.S. , Ances, Beau M.

Annals of Neurology | September 22, 2025 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1237-1248

10.1002/ana.78002 Get It

Objectives Directly compare the brain glucose patterns seen with [F‐18] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) between 2 genetically determined forms of Alzheimer's disease: Down syndrome (DS) and autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD). Methods Cross‐sectional analyses of FDG were performed in individuals with DS (n = 76) from the Alzheimer Biomarker Consortium‐Down Syndrome (ABC‐DS), ADAD (n = 297), and neurotypical familial controls (n = 188) from the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network (DIAN). Within‐group linear regression models and generalized additive models were performed for select regional FDG uptake measures (isthmus cingulate and inferior parietal, precuneus, middle temporal gyrus, and precentral gyrus). Age, sex, apolipoprotein (APOE) ε4 carrier status, and cortical amyloid burden were included within these analyses. Results Even 20 years before expected onset of clinical symptoms, FDG uptake was lower for DS compared to neurotypical familial controls ( p < 0.01). ADAD baseline FDG was similar to neurotypical familial controls until 7 years before expected symptom onset. Both symptomatic individuals with DS and ADAD had lower FDG compared to neurotypical familial controls ( p < 0.01). A higher amyloid burden was associated with lower FDG for both genetic forms, with similar rates of decline in FDG uptake for DS and ADAD who were amyloid positive. Interpretation Brain glucose metabolism is substantially lower for people with DS, even in individuals who are cognitively stable. The patterns of FDG decline are distinct in these 2 genetically determined forms of AD. The diagnostic utility of FDG‐PET is specific to the genetic form of AD. ANN NEUROL 2025;98:1237–1248