Kase, Adam M

Background: Longitudinal genomic profiling through serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing offers a noninvasive method to monitor clonal evolution in advanced prostate cancer. This study evaluated the frequency and nature of newly emergent and potentially actionable genomic alterations detected through serial testing in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of advanced prostate cancer patients who underwent multiple Guardant360 ctDNA tests between October 2020 and March 2023. The study focused on identifying new genomic alterations absent in the initial test, with particular attention to alterations relevant for on-label therapies, therapies approved in other oncologic indications (i.e., off-label), or a clinical trial. Results: Among 479 patients with at least two ctDNA tests, the median interval between the first and second evaluable tests was 207 days. New and potentially actionable alterations emerged in 57.8% of patients, including potential targets for on-label therapies (16.7%), off-label therapies (16.5%), and clinical trials (55.7%). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) increased from “low” to “high” in 11% of patients, although none had microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiency. In a Mayo Clinic subset, ten patients received olaparib based on treatment-emergent alterations, but none achieved a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Two patients who transitioned from low to high TMB received pembrolizumab, both with progressive disease as best response. Conclusions: In a large real-world cohort, serial ctDNA testing frequently identified new alterations that were not detected at baseline and are potentially actionable therapeutic targets, highlighting the value of serial genomic profiling for capturing clonal dynamics. Additional research is needed to better establish a framework for retesting and to clarify how these results should influence subsequent treatment decisions.

356 Background: Approval of multiple therapeutic agents for castrate resistant prostate cancer (CPRPC) has improved survival and also quality of life. However, how to optimize sequencing is still an ongoing challenge for most clinicians. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients treated with FDA approved regimens for castrate resistant prostate cancer from 2002 to 2017 at Mayo Clinical Florida was completed. Data on progression free survival of the various treatment sequences including abiraterone, docetaxel, and enzalutamide were reviewed. Results: One hundred patients were included in the study. Those on clinical trial were excluded. All patients were on LHRH agonist /antagonist and were continued while on the subsequent treatments. The first line therapy progression free survival (PFS) was 245 days with abiraterone acetate (AA), 307 days with enzalutamide (E) and docetaxel 285 days, respectively. The second line therapy PFS was 201 days with AA and 166 days with E. When AA was given after E PFS was 97 days and when E was given after AA the PFS was 68 days. E given after docetaxel resulted in a PFS of 390 days for one patient. Conclusions: In this chart review, enzalutamide had the longest PFS when used as the first line therapy and the PFS was improved when used as a second line after docetaxel. This retrospective review suggests therapy sequencing may be optimized to increase progressive free survival in patients with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer.