Verbeek, Jef

Background & Aims: Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only cure for severe polycystic liver disease (PLD). However, LT indications and strategies vary across Europe, resulting in (unwanted) practice variation and unequal access to care for patients with PLD. This study aimed to (1) identify existing PLD-specific LT criteria across European countries, (2) assess which criteria are considered relevant by specialist, and (3) map the variation in liver-kidney transplant strategies among patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Methods: National PLD-specific LT criteria were collected, and if unavailable ERN RARE-Liver representatives from that country were asked to provide information. An online survey was conducted amongst hepatologists, LT surgeons, and nephrologists managing patients with PLD. The survey assessed relevant LT indications/listing requirements, clinical case evaluations, and explored preferences for liver-kidney transplantation in patients with ADPKD. Results: Defined LT criteria for patients with PLD were available in only 8 of the 17 assessed countries and showed substantial variation. Sixty-nine clinicians (43 hepatologists, 15 surgeons, 11 nephrologists), predominantly from LT centers (75.4%), completed the survey. Key LT indications were recurrent liver cyst infections (78.3%), significant impaired quality of life (75.4%), and severe malnutrition (75.4%). In ADPKD simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK) was preferred by 40.4% of respondents, primarily due the favorable immunological profile (47.6%) and prevention of renal failure (33.3%). In contrast, those favoring a liver-first approach (30.8%), followed by sequential kidney transplant, highlighted the potential harm to the kidney graft during SLK (62.5%). Conclusions: Uniform PLD-specific LT criteria in Europe are lacking. While recurrent liver cyst infections, decreased quality of life, and malnutrition are widely recognized as crucial LT indications, they are insufficiently reflected in existing criteria, contributing to unequal access to LT. Moreover, considerable variation exists in liver-kidney transplantation for ADPKD patients, with a current lack of evidence to support one approach over another.

Background and Aims: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a complication of cirrhosis characterized by multiple organ failure and high short-term mortality. The pathophysiology of ACLF involves elevated systemic inflammation leading to organ failure, along with immune dysfunction that heightens susceptibility to bacterial infections. However, it is unclear how these aspects are associated with recovery and nonrecovery in ACLF. Approach and Results: Here, we mapped the single-cell transcriptome of circulating immune cells from patients with ACLF and acute decompensated (AD) cirrhosis and healthy individuals. We further interrogate how these findings, as well as immunometabolic and functional profiles, associate with ACLF-recovery (ACLF-R) or nonrecovery (ACLF-NR). Our analysis unveiled 2 distinct states of classical monocytes (cMons). Hereto, ACLF-R cMons were characterized by transcripts associated with immune and stress tolerance, including anti-inflammatory genes such as RETN and LGALS1. Additional metabolomic and functional validation experiments implicated an elevated oxidative phosphorylation metabolic program as well as an impaired ACLF-R cMon functionality. Interestingly, we observed a common stress-induced tolerant state, oxidative phosphorylation program, and blunted activation among lymphoid populations in patients with ACLF-R. Conversely, ACLF-NR cMon featured elevated expression of inflammatory and stress response genes such as VIM, LGALS2, and TREM1, along with blunted metabolic activity and increased functionality. Conclusions: This study identifies distinct immunometabolic cellular states that contribute to disease outcomes in patients with ACLF. Our findings provide valuable insights into the pathogenesis of ACLF, shedding light on factors driving either recovery or nonrecovery phenotypes, which may be harnessed as potential therapeutic targets in the future.