Back to Authors

Shapiro, Anna

0009-0007-9239-3022

Mayo Clinic

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.

Citations 2

Empowering Early Recovery: The Role of Impella 5.5 in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Desai, Aarti , Ruiz, Jose , Shapiro, Anna Bovill , Klingbeil, R. , Goswami, Rohan , Shapiro, Anna , Klingbeil, Rebecca , Goswami, Rohan M , Desai, Aarti , Martin, Archer Kilbourne

Journal of Clinical Medicine | September 5, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 17 | Pages: 6278

10.3390/jcm14176278 Get It

Introduction: Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM), also known as stress cardiomyopathy or Broken Heart Syndrome, is a reversible, transient state of myocardial dyskinesis and apical ballooning. Infrequently, TCM may progress to severe life-threatening complications such as cardiogenic shock. Early mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is crucial to myocardial recovery in these cases. We present one of the first cases of TCM successfully treated with the advanced micro-axial minimally invasive Impella 5.5 with SmartAssist MCS device. Case Presentation: A female in her late 70s with a history of hypothyroidism, atrial fibrillation post-ablation, and cholelithiasis was referred to our facility for an elective cholecystectomy. Post-anesthesia induction with propofol 2.1 mg/kg (140 mg bolus), she became bradycardic and hypotensive, eventually leading to asystole, requiring CPR and termination of the procedure. Echocardiography revealed a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 24% with mid-ventricular akinesis and apical ballooning with mild mitral regurgitation, suggesting the diagnosis of TCM. Cardiac catheterization showed RA 20 and mean PA 42 mmHg. Lactate was 18.7 mmol/L and LDH 1776 U/L, suggesting progressive shock. Continuous epinephrine 0.1 mcg/kg/min and norepinephrine 0.06 mcg/kg/min were titrated for BP 97/58, and she was initially supported with the Impella CP device. Despite aggressive efforts, rising LDH levels and increased vasopressor needs indicated inadequate organ perfusion, requiring an upgrade to Impella 5.5. Impella 5.5 support for 11 days led to impressive myocardial recovery, leading to reductions, and eventual discontinuation, of inotropes and vasopressors. Post-Impella 5.5 explantation, her LVEF was 59–65% and she was discharged with Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry (MCOT) monitoring for her arrhythmias and reinitiation of guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs) for her comorbidities. Her 2-month follow-up shows sustained LVEF greater than 45% with functional improvements. Conclusions: Early escalation within 24 h of Impella CP to Impella 5.5 provided stabilization of cardiometabolic shock, preventing end-organ damage, allowing recovery of native heart function while maintaining ambulatory status, and allowing for optimizing medical therapy. It presents a safe, minimally invasive, and cost-effective intervention in TCM cases refractory to GDMT or when additional time is needed for decision-making in cases presenting with CS.
Recognizing Post-Cardiac Injury Syndrome After Impella 5.5 Insertion in Cardiogenic Shock: A Case-Based Discussion
Desai, Aarti , Sharma, Shriya , Ruiz, Jose , Leoni, Juan , Shapiro, Anna Bovill , Landolfo, Kevin , Goswami, Rohan , Shapiro, Anna , Leoni, Juan Carlos , Goswami, Rohan M , Desai, Aarti

Biomedicines | July 16, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1737

10.3390/biomedicines13071737 Get It

The use of temporary mechanical circulatory support in refractory heart failure cardiogenic shock (HFCS) has risen, leading to potential complications. Post-Cardiac Injury Syndrome (PCIS) from Impella insertion is rare but may result from subclavian artery manipulation and aortic irritation. We report the first case of pericarditis (PCIS) caused by Impella 5.5 insertion in an HFCS patient awaiting heart transplantation. The patient developed chest pain, tachycardia, and hypotension post-Impella insertion. Laboratory results and electrocardiograms confirmed PCIS. Treatment with Ibuprofen and Colchicine was successful. He received a heart transplant 14 days later. This case emphasizes recognizing iatrogenic pericarditis after Impella insertion and the need to avoid additional myocardial strain.