Zaidat, Osama O.

Background: Low wall shear stress (LSS) is an established cause of pro-atherogenic endothelial pathophysiology, yet it has never been demonstrated in the cerebral circulation affected by intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Noninvasive CT angiography (CTA) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) enables high-resolution investigation of detailed post-stenotic phenomena. We used all available CTA data in the SAMMPRIS trial of ICAD to detect and quantify post-stenotic LSS. Methods: CTA source images from SAMMPRIS were reconstructed in 3D followed by geometry refinements to generate a mesh of the diseased arterial lesion and adjacent segments. CFD was performed with Ansys (ICEM, Fluent), applying reference boundary conditions with k-omega turbulence and non-Newtonian modeling of the traversing blood viscosity. 3D CFD parameter maps illustrated velocity, velocity swirling and corresponding wall shear stress. Results: 144 subjects enrolled in SAMMPRIS had CTA at baseline, including 140 with CTA source images enabling CFD. Post-stenotic velocity profiles revealed vortices in all cases, quantified by swirling and turbulent kinetic energy. These luminal flow changes were adjacent to focal regions of LSS in the post-stenotic region (Figure). Conclusions: Low wall shear stress is associated with vortices of fluid flow in CTA CFD modeling of ICAD from SAMMPRIS. CTA source images may be used to noninvasively quantify LSS and model this pro-atherogenic factor in ICAD across a wide variety of lesions. Future studies should examine the related endothelial biology and potential link with plaque evolution.

Background and Purpose— Angiographic revascularization grading after intra-arterial stroke therapy is limited by poor standardization, making it unclear which scale is optimal for predicting outcome. Using recently standardized criteria, we sought to compare the prognostic performance of 2 commonly used reperfusion scales. Methods— Inclusion criteria for this multicenter retrospective study were acute ischemic stroke attributable to middle cerebral artery M1 occlusion, intra-arterial therapy, and 90-day modified Rankin scale score. Post–intra-arterial therapy reperfusion was graded using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) and Modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scales. The scales were compared for prediction of clinical outcome using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Results— Of 308 patients, mean age was 65 years, and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 17. The mean time from stroke onset to groin puncture was 305 minutes. There was no difference in the time to treatment between patients grouped by final TIMI (ie, 0 versus 1 versus 2 versus 3) or mTICI grades (ie, 0 versus 1 versus 2a versus 2b versus 3). Good outcome (modified Rankin scale, 0–2) was achieved in 32.5% of patients, and mortality rate was 25.3% at 90 days. There was a 6.3% rate of parenchymal hematoma type 2. In receiver-operating characteristic analysis, mTICI was superior to TIMI for predicting 90-day modified Rankin scale 0 to 2 (c-statistic: 0.74 versus 0.68; P <0.0001). The optimal threshold for identifying a good outcome was mTICI 2b to 3 (sensitivity 78.0%; specificity 66.1%). Conclusions— mTICI is superior to TIMI for predicting clinical outcome after intra-arterial therapy. mTICI 2b to 3 is the optimal biomarker for procedural success.

Objective There are few data regarding the effect of the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial results on the management of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). We sought to understand the impact of the SAMMPRIS trial on current ICAD clinical practices and future trial design. Methods During the ICAD symposium at the 2012 International Stroke Conference, electronic data were collected regarding attendees’ clinical management of ICAD and opinions on the feasibility of future trials post-SAMMPRIS. Results 217 attendees from different specialties, including neurologists (57%), neurointerventionalists (9%) and neurosurgeons (5%), participated in the session. The majority of respondents (77%) indicated that the results of SAMMPRIS have impacted their consideration for intracranial stenting. Post-SAMMPRIS, 84% selected ‘SAMMPRIS-style’ medical management for the treatment of ICAD. For patients with ICAD who failed aggressive medical therapy, 82% would consider an alternative approach to continuing medical therapy (30% considered clinical trial enrollment, 28% suggested angioplasty and stenting and 24% angioplasty). The majority of participants (85%) were willing to randomize patients with symptomatic ICAD in future trials. For the next ICAD trial, 29% indicated that angioplasty alone should be compared with aggressive medical therapy. Conclusions Our polling results suggest that the SAMMPRIS trial has had an impact on the current treatment of ICAD. Treatment of patients who failed medical therapy varied widely from aggressive medical therapy to balloon angioplasty, stenting or enrollment in future clinical trials. The willingness to continue clinical trials and randomize patients supports the need for future ICAD studies.