Chari, Aswin

Background: Major depressive disorder remains a leading cause of disability. While subgenual cingulate cortex (sgCC) deep brain stimulation (DBS) shows promise for medically refractory depression, clinical outcomes have been heterogeneous, suggesting that individual differences in neural circuitry engagement may critically influence therapeutic efficacy. We aimed to define the electrophysiological signatures of sgCC efferent connectivity using single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) with intracranial stereo-EEG (sEEG) to inform rational targeting and physiological biomarkers for sgCC-DBS. Methods: In four patients undergoing clinically indicated sEEG for seizure mapping, SPES was delivered through sgCC pairs, while distributed brain stimulation-evoked potentials (BSEPs) were recorded across cortical and subcortical sites. Responses were characterized using Canonical Response Parameterization to extract reproducible waveforms and per-trial reliability. Results: sgCC stimulation elicited reproducible, spatially organized BSEPs across frontal, limbic, and paralimbic networks, aligning with known anatomical pathways. Frontal recruitment featured robust, lateralized orbitofrontal activation favoring the ipsilateral central, medial OFC and bilateral ventromedial prefrontal responses. Limbic effects demonstrated bilateral cingulate activation with stronger ipsilateral recruitment and lateralized amygdala and hippocampal responses. Paralimbic engagement included insular responses with subject-specific anterior predominance and bi-hemispheric temporal-polar slow-wave deflections. Conclusion: These findings provide direct electrophysiological evidence of distributed, lateralized sgCC divergent network connectivity in the human brain, offering physiologic confirmation of its role in affective circuitry. The observed topography and laterality have direct applications for sgCC-DBS targeting and implicate BSEP signatures as candidate biomarkers to guide patient-specific therapy.

Abstract Cortico‐cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) are an active electrophysiological technique used during intracranial electroencephalography to evaluate the effective connectivity and influence of therapeutic stimulation between distinct cortical regions and pinpoint epileptogenic zones (EZs) in patients with epilepsy. Various methodologies have been implemented to analyze CCEPs and characterize the epileptogenic networks for EZ localization. Despite its promise, their interpretation remains challenging due to the large volumes of spatially and temporally complex data generated. Early studies focused largely on qualitative descriptors and predefined, semi‐quantitative features such as waveform morphology and peak latencies. However, these methods are limited by the significant heterogeneity in CCEP waveform conformations across patients and cortical regions. The specific technique used for extraction of features, such as the spectral band power and root mean squared values, remains open to empirical refinement, as does choice of appropriate latency windows, with no consensus reached regarding the optimal approach. Graph theoretical metrics such as degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and clustering coefficients can provide a rich representation of epileptogenic network connectivity. However, these metrics are often abstract and difficult to interpret in a clinical setting or to the non‐expert, and their neuroscientific substrates remains poorly understood. The lack of standardization in stimulation protocol and data‐processing pipelines has further contributed to inconsistency in reported findings. Emerging machine learning approaches have been increasingly applied to CCEP data, offering a more data‐driven and potentially generalizable way to identify electrophysiological biomarkers of the epileptogenic effective connectivity. In this article, we discuss qualitative, quantitative, and spectral features; network‐analytical metrics; and more recently, data driven methodologies aimed at improving the interpretability and clinical utility of CCEP data.