Służewska‐Niedźwiedź, Monika

Abstract Objective The upper frequency limit of human brain activity remains unknown. Using ultrahigh sampling rate (≥20 kHz) intracranial microelectroencephalography, this study aimed to systematically explore and quantitatively characterize brain field oscillations beyond the established high‐frequency oscillation range (>2 kHz), and to determine their relationship to epileptogenic tissue. Methods We analyzed intracranial electroencephalographic recordings from 15 patients with drug‐resistant epilepsy, comprising 466 microcontacts and 434 macrocontacts implanted in mesiotemporal structures across four international epilepsy centers. A custom spectrogram‐based detector optimized for ultrahigh frequencies was developed to identify ultrafast oscillations (UFOs; >2 kHz). UFO rates were assessed in epileptic (successfully resected) and nonepileptic hippocampi and compared with established electrophysiological biomarkers, including interictal epileptiform discharges, ripples, and fast ripples. Statistical comparisons were performed using mixed‐effects models to account for intersubject and interelectrode variability. Results We identified a previously undescribed class of short‐duration oscillatory events spanning 2–8 kHz. UFOs occurred at significantly higher rates in epileptic compared with nonepileptic mesiotemporal regions, with the strongest differentiation observed in the 2–3‐kHz band. Two distinct UFO phenotypes were consistently observed: (1) spindlelike, narrow‐band oscillations and (2) sharp‐onset, rapidly decaying bursts. Both forms were prevalent within epileptic hippocampi but were exceedingly rare in nonepileptic structures. UFOs exhibited pronounced temporal intermittency and spatial focality and frequently arose independently of ripples, fast ripples, and very high‐frequency oscillations, indicating that they represent a distinct electrophysiological phenomenon. Macrocontacts detected UFOs only exceptionally, highlighting the necessity of microelectrode recordings to capture activity in this ultrahigh‐frequency regime. Significance These findings substantially extend the known frequency range of human brain field activity and identify ultrafast oscillations as a novel biomarker of neuronal hyperexcitability. UFOs likely reflect pathological microcircuit dynamics inaccessible to conventional clinical recordings and provide new insights into the organization and pathophysiology of epileptogenic networks.

Abstract Oscillations in the high gamma and ripple frequency ranges are known to coordinate local hippocampal and neocortical neuronal assemblies during memory encoding and recall. Here, we explored spatiotemporal dynamics and the role of global coordination of these fast oscillatory discharges across the sensory and associational cortical areas in distinct phases of memory processing. Individual bursts of high frequency oscillations were detected in intracranial recordings from epilepsy patients remembering word lists for immediate free recall. We found constant coincident bursting across visual and higher order processing areas, peaking before recall and elevated during encoding of words. This global co-bursting was modulated by memory processing, engaged approximately half of the recorded electrode sites, and clustered into a sequence of multiple consecutive bursting discharges. Our results suggest a general role of global coincident high frequency oscillations in organizing large-scale information processing across the brain necessary especially, but not exclusively, for memory functions.

The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between lambda waves (LWs) and other occipital waveforms, in a retrospective analysis of electroencephalograms (EEGs) of clinic and hospitalized patients at a single center. The LWs were correlated with α rhythm, photic driving, and positive occipital sharp transients of sleep (POSTS). A computer-generated cursor quantified amplitude and duration of POSTS and LWs (3 waveforms and both hemispheres). Fisher exact test was used for significance ( P ≤ .05). A total of 116 patients were evaluated. Of 111 patients, with interpretable results, 74 (66.67%) had visual scanning during EEG, with 37 (50.0%) having LWs. The LWs (17.69 µV) were consistently smaller than POSTS (31.40 µV) despite similar morphology. Patients with an α rhythm of >8.5 Hz were strongly correlated with the presence of LWs ( P < .0001), and those with LWs were strongly predictive of normal EEG ( P = .001). Of the 37 patients, 27 (73.0%) with LWs had photic driving ( P = .0496). No correlation was found between LWs and POSTS ( P = .45). The presence of LWs and a low normal posterior dominant rhythm (PDR) suggests intact electrocerebral health. LWs and the photic driving response suggest similar generators but stimulus-specific networks. POSTS differ from LWs despite similar morphology, suggesting different network activation of occipital generators. LWs have clinical significance in excluding encephalopathy. Occipital generators are differentiated by state and stimulus-dependent network activation and not by location and morphology.