Back to Authors

Murugadoss, Karthik

0000-0002-4247-6168

Mayo Clinic

nference Inc, Cambridge, MA.

Citations 2

Use of Machine‐Learning Models to Identify Clinical Features Associated With A Future Clinical Worsening Event in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
DuBrock, Hilary M. , Tang, Xiaoqin , Doad, Gurinderpal , Lam, Jenny , Cho, Michelle , Murugadoss, Karthik , Doddahonnaiah, Deeksha , Wagner, Tyler E. , DuBrock, Hilary M , Murugadoss, Karthik , Doad, Gurinderpal , Cho, Michelle , Wagner, Tyler E

Pulmonary Circulation | May 6, 2026 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/pul2.70294 Get It

ABSTRACT Clinical worsening events are increasingly recognized as a meaningful outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We applied machine‐learning models to real‐world data to identify clinical features that may predict clinical worsening events in PAH. Data were obtained retrospectively from the electronic health records of adults diagnosed with PAH at Mayo Clinic locations (January 2015–December 2019). Machine‐learning LASSO regularized logistic regression models were developed to analyze the association between 100 clinical features and occurrence of clinical worsening events. In total, 455 patients were included (mean age 62.1 years; 59.3% female). Of these, 232 (51.0%) experienced a clinical worsening event after a median (quartile 1, quartile 3) of 10.9 (4.1, 21.4) months. The best‐performing model had an area under the curve of 0.78, sensitivity of 78%, and specificity of 59%. The model identified 11 clinical features associated with clinical worsening events in PAH with a non‐zero coefficient: baseline age, body mass index (BMI), creatinine level, red cell (erythrocyte) distribution width (RDW), mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, sodium concentration, and QT interval, along with dyspnea, number of clinic visits, and other forms of heart disease within a 1‐month window before a clinical worsening event. Baseline RDW and BMI, and number of clinic visits within the 1‐month window were statistically significantly associated with clinical worsening events. Our study used machine‐learning models to identify clinical features associated with risk of clinical worsening events in PAH. Automation of risk prediction could lead to earlier therapeutic intervention to optimize patient outcomes.
Real-World Safety and Health Care Resource Utilization of Teclistamab Under an Outpatient Model for Step-Up Dosing Administration
Sandahl, Tyler B. , Soefje, Scott A. , Ailawadhi, Sikander , Parrondo, Ricardo , Lin, Dee , Wu, Bingcao , Calay, Ediz S. , Silvert, Eli , Carpenter, Corinne , Wagner, Tyler E. , Fowler, Jessica , Hester, Laura , Rangarajan, Nivedita , Marshall, Alexander Mclean, Stoy, Patrick, Gifkins, Dina , Kumar, Shaji , Ailawadhi, Sikander , Parrondo, Ricardo D , Lin, Dee , Wu, Bingcao , Calay, Ediz S , Wagner, Tyler E , Hester, Laura , Murugadoss, Karthik , Gifkins, Dina , Lin, Yi , Kumar, Shaji K , Soefje, Scott A , Sandahl, Tyler B , Fonseca, Rafaël , Kim, Nina , Fowler, Jessica, Murugadoss, Karthik , Marshall, Alexander, Lin, Yi

JCO Oncology Practice | December 20, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 702-709

10.1200/op-24-00489 Get It

PURPOSE Teclistamab is initiated with a step-up dosing (SUD) schedule to mitigate the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Early teclistamab users commonly received SUD in a hospital setting. This study aimed to evaluate safety and health care resource utilization (HRU) in real-world patients with multiple myeloma who initiated teclistamab SUD in an outpatient setting. METHODS This was a retrospective study using Mayo Clinic's electronic medical records from October 26, 2022, to October 31, 2023. Patient characteristics were summarized for all patients treated with teclistamab and separately for patients who started SUD outpatient. SUD pattern, safety, HRU, and post-SUD dosing schedule were described in patients with complete SUD. RESULTS At data cutoff, 65 patients received ≥1 teclistamab dose, including 58 patients who initiated SUD outpatient (median age, 69.2 years; male, 63.8%; White, 89.7%). Among 57 patients who completed SUD in an outpatient setting, all received premedications on the days of teclistamab administrations per label recommendation; 18 (31.6%) developed CRS (13 grade 1, four grade 2, and one grade 4) and two developed ICANS (one each with grade 2 and 4). All CRS and ICANS resolved with supportive care and all patients continued treatment. Eighteen patients were admitted to the hospital for CRS treatment, with a median CRS-related hospital stay of 2 days per admission. Most (60%) doses during SUD required <1 hour clinic time between administration and checkout. Post-SUD, clinic time for treatment doses decreased to <30 minutes for most doses (82%). CONCLUSION Outcomes of this study support outpatient administration as a safe and feasible option for teclistamab SUD to potentially reduce HRU and improve patient experiences.