Back to Authors

Kühnel, Volker

0009-0004-9059-1592

Mayo Clinic

Sonova (Switzerland)

Citations 1

How Does Deep Neural Network-Based Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids Impact Cochlear Implant Candidacy?
Saoji, Aniket A. , Bertsch, Natasha J., Goulson, Kayla R., Graham, Madison K., McDonald, Elizabeth , Bross, Abigail E., Vaisberg, Jonathan M. , Kühnel, Volker, Voss, Solveig C., Qian, Jinyu, Hogan, Cynthia A. , DeJong, Melissa D., McDonald, Elizabeth A, Kühnel, Volker , Hogan, Cynthia H , Sheikh, Bilal A, McDonald, Elizabeth A

Audiology Research | December 13, 2024 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1114-1125

10.3390/audiolres14060092 Get It

Background/Objectives: Adult hearing-impaired patients qualifying for cochlear implants typically exhibit less than 60% sentence recognition under the best hearing aid conditions, either in quiet or noisy environments, with speech and noise presented through a single speaker. This study examines the influence of deep neural network-based (DNN-based) noise reduction on cochlear implant evaluation. Methods: Speech perception was assessed using AzBio sentences in both quiet and noisy conditions (multi-talker babble) at 5 and 10 dB signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) through one loudspeaker. Sentence recognition scores were measured for 10 hearing-impaired patients using three hearing aid programs: calm situation, speech in noise, and spheric speech in loud noise (DNN-based noise reduction). Speech perception results were compared to bench analyses comprising the phase inversion technique, employed to predict SNR improvement, and the Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI v2), utilized to predict speech intelligibility. Results: The spheric speech in loud noise program improved speech perception by 20 to 32% points as compared to the calm situation program. Thus, DNN-based noise reduction can improve speech perception in noisy environments, potentially reducing the need for cochlear implants in some cases. The phase inversion method showed a 4–5 dB SNR improvement for the DNN-based noise reduction program compared to the other two programs. HASPI v2 predicted slightly better speech intelligibility than was measured in this study. Conclusions: DNN-based noise reduction might make it difficult for some patients with significant residual hearing to qualify for cochlear implantation, potentially delaying its adoption or eliminating the need for it entirely.