Background Inadequate preventive dental care may contribute to inflammatory conditions such as periodontitis, increasing cardiovascular disease risk. Artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiography (AI‐ECG) algorithms accurately estimate cardiovascular disease risk. We investigated the association between inadequate preventive dental care and the AI‐ECG–estimated risk of atrial fibrillation, aortic stenosis, low ejection fraction, cardiac amyloid, cardiovascular aging, and all‐cause mortality. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 266 637 Mayo Clinic patients (2018–2024) who completed a Social Determinants of Health Survey and had an ECG performed within 1 year of survey completion. AI‐ECG algorithms generated continuous risk scores (0 or 1) for atrial fibrillation, aortic stenosis, low ejection fraction, and amyloid. Cardiac aging was assessed by delta age, calculated as AI‐ECG–estimated physiological age minus the chronological age. Associations with preventive dental care were analyzed using logistic regression. Cox regression evaluated dental care predictiveness on all‐cause mortality. Results Among 266 637 individuals (mean age, 59.5±16.4 years; 51.1% women), 49 918 (18.7%) reported inadequate preventive dental care. These individuals had higher delta age and increased AI‐ECG–predicted risks of atrial fibrillation, aortic stenosis, amyloid, and reduced ejection fraction (all P <0.001). In multivariable logistic regression models including all AI‐ECG scores, inadequate preventive dental care was associated with higher probabilities of low ejection fraction (odds ratio [OR], 1.80 [95% CI, 1.69–1.91]), atrial fibrillation (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.04–1.17]), aortic stenosis (OR, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.64–2.20]), amyloid (OR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12–1.25]), and higher delta age (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.02–1.03]) (all P <0.001). Inadequate preventive dental care predicted all‐cause mortality after adjusting for demographics, risk factors, and AI‐ECG algorithms (HR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.38–1.53], P <0.001). Conclusions Inadequate preventive dental care is associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease. AI‐ECG algorithms may facilitate cardiovascular risk stratification among individuals with limited preventive dental care access.
Prognostic Implications of Resistive Reserve Ratio in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease With Myocardial Bridging
Background Myocardial bridging (MB) is accompanied by the dynamic extravascular compression of epicardial coronary arteries, leading to intracoronary hemodynamic disturbance with abnormal coronary flow profiles. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic implications of resistive reserve ratio (RRR), a composite measure of flow and pressure parameters that represents the vasodilatory capacity of the coronary arteries, in patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) and MB, in comparison with coronary flow reserve (CFR). Methods and Results In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with ANOCA who underwent coronary reactivity testing, where MB was identified by transient constriction in coronary artery segments between systole and diastole. Abnormal CFR and RRR were defined as <2.5 and <2.62, respectively. Major adverse cardiac events, including cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and late revascularization, served as outcomes. Among 1251 patients with ANOCA, 191 (15.3%) had MB. The prevalence of abnormal CFR or RRR was not significantly different between patients with and without MB ( P =0.144 and P =0.398, respectively). Over a median follow‐up time of 6.9 years, abnormal RRR predicted major adverse cardiac events in patients with MB (hazard ratio [HR], 4.38 [95% CI, 1.71–11.21]; P =0.002) and without MB (HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.38–2.64]; P <0.001). Abnormal CFR predicted major adverse cardiac events in patients without MB (HR, 2.15 [95% CI, 1.54–3.00]; P <0.001), whereas it was not predictive of major adverse cardiac events in patients with MB (HR, 2.29 [95% CI, 0.93–5.65]; P =0.073). Conclusions In patients with ANOCA and MB, impaired RRR was superior to impaired CFR in distinguishing patients at a higher risk of future adverse events, suggesting that RRR may serve as a risk stratification tool in patients with MB and ANOCA.